Reforma Paktu Stabilności i Wzrostu

• Autorzy: Bartłomiej Rokicki

Warianty tytułu

Reform of the Stability and Growth Pact

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

Artykuł omawia szczegółowe propozycje zmian w Pakcie Stabilności i Wzrostu przedstawione przez Komisję Europejską, stanowiska negocjacyjne państw członkowskich oraz ostateczny kształt reformy i jej możliwe konsekwencje zarówno dla dalszego funkcjonowania Paktu, jak i sytuacji gospodarczej Wspólnoty.

EN

The article is dedicated to a Reform of the Stability and Growth Pact endorsed by the Council of the European Union at its meeting in Brussels on March 22-23, 2005. Under reform gudelines worked out by the European Commission and consulted within the Community, any changes to the pact should enable more effective supervision over the budget deficit and public debt in EU member states. On the other hand reforms should guarantee member states sufficient flexibility in pursuing their national fiscal policies. In this context, the Council's decisions, made under the pressure of France and Germany, put a question mark over not only the implementation of the key goals of the reform, but also the continued functioning of the pact. The compromise reached within the Council may be important for new member states, both in the context of their prospective accession to the euro zone and the ongoing negotiations on the new financial perspective for 2007-2013. The author notes that by offering concessions in the area of the pact, Poland could probably count on the "gratefulness" of the key net contributors to the EU budget. (original abstarcat)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Budżet UE; Deficyt budżetowy; Polityka podatkowa; Restrukturyzacja; Dług publiczny; Wzrost gospodarczy

EN

EU budget; Budget deficit; Tax policy; Restructuring; Public debt; Economic growth

• Czasopismo: Gospodarka Narodowa
• Rocznik: 2005
• Numer: nr 10
• Strony: 3--23

Twórcy

autor

Bartłomiej Rokicki

Bibliografia

• Andres J., Hernando L, [1997], Does inflation harm economic growth?, Evidence for the OECD, NBER Working Paper No. 6062.
• Annett A., Jaeger A., [2004], Europe's quest for fiscal discipline, Finance & Development, June.
• Barysch K., [2003], A pact for stability and growth, Centre for European Reform.
• Boeri I., Tabellini G., [2004], Saving the Stability Pact from itself, Commentary, Project Syndicate.
• Bofinger P., [2003], Should the Stability and Growth Pact be changed?, Intereconomics, January/February.
• Buiter W., [2003], How to reform the Stability and Growth Pact, European Bank for Reconstrution and Development.
• Buti M., Eijffinger S., Franco D., [2003], Revisiting the Stability and Growth Pact: Grand design or internal adjustment?, CEPR Discussion Paper No. 3692.
• Collignon S., [2004], The end of the Stability and Growth Pact?, International Economics and Economic Policy Vol. 1, No. 1.
• Commission of the European Communities, [2004], Communication from the Commission to the Council an the European Parliament: Strengthening economic governance and clarifying the implementation of the Stability and Growth Pact.
• Council of the European Union, [2005], European Council Brussels 22 and 23 March 2005. Presidency Conclusions.
• de Grauwe P., [2003], The Stability and Growth Pact in need of reform.
• Economic and Financial Committee, [2004], Non-paper. Strengthening, clarifying and better implementing the Stability and Growth Pact.
• Economic and Financial Committee, [2004], Reviewing the Stability and Growth Pact: options for change.
• Eichengreen B., [2003], What to do with the Stability Pact, Intereconomics, January/February.
• Eijffinger S., [2003], How can the Stability and Growth Pact be improved to achieve both stronger discipline and higher flexibility?, Intereconomics, January/February.
• European Commission, DG ECFIN, [2004], Budgetary statistics and budgetary surveillance, Note for the Economic and Financial Committee - Alternates.
• European Commission, DG ECFIN, [2004], Economic growth forecasts and fiscal performance, Note for the Alternates of the Economic and Financial Committee.
• European Commission, DG ECFIN, [2004], Exceptional and temporary circumstances, Note for the Economic and Financial Committee.
• European Commission, DG ECFIN, [2004], Identifying sustainable targets for the medium-term objective of close-to-balance or in surplus (CTBOIS), Note for the attention of the EFC Alternates.
• European Commission, DG ECFIN, [2005], Improving governance, Note for the Economic and Financial Committee.
• European Commission, DG ECFIN, [2004], Improving the implementation of the excessive deficit procedure, Note for the Economic and Financial Committee.
• European Commission, DG ECFIN, [2004], Increasing focus on debt and sustainability: the debt criterion, Note for the Alternates of the Economic and Financial Committee.
• European Commission, DG ECFIN, [2004], Structural reforms and fiscal surveillance.
• European Commission, DG ECFIN, [2004], Structural reforms and sustainability.
• Fatas A., Mihov I., [2002], Fiscal Policy in the EMU: Challenges of the Early Years, [w:] Marco Buti and Andre Sapir (eds.), EMU and Economic Policy in Europe: The Challenge of the Early Years.
• Fischer C., [2002], Real currency appreciation in accession countries: Balassa-Samuelson effect and investment demand, Economic Research Centre of Deutsche Bundesbank, Discussion Paper 19/02.
• Hafeker C., [2003], Credible at last? Reforming the Stability Pact, Intereconomics, January/February.
• Halenberg M., [2004], How should the Stability and Growth Pact be reformed?, Finance & Development, June.
• Hughes-Hallet A,. Lewis J., von Hagen J., [2004], Fiscal policy in Europe 1991-2003: an evidence-based analysis, CEPR.
• Jazbec B., [2002], Balassa-Samuelson effect in transition economies: the case of Slovenia, William Davidson Institute, Working Paper No. 507.
• McDonald R., Ricci L., [2002], PPP and the Balassa-Samuelson effect: the role of the distribution sector, DNB Staff Reports No. 81.
• Mathieu C., Sterdyniak H., [2003], Reforming the Stability and Growth Pact: Breaking the ice, Paper for the 20th Symposium on Banking and Monetary Economics in Birmingham.
• Mortensen J., [2004], Economic policy coordination in EMU: What role for the SGP?, Centre for European Policy Studies, Working Document No. 202.
• Orłowski W., [2001], Możliwość spełnienia przez Polskę kryteriów konwergencji z Maastricht, Mimeo.
• Rother P., [2004], Fiscal policy and inflation volatility, European Central Bank, Working Paper No. 317.
• Schadler S., [2004], Charting a course towards successful Euro adoption, Finance & Development, June.
• Schuknecht L., [2004], EU fiscal rules. Issues and lessons from political economy, European Central Bank, Working Paper No. 421.
• Ubide A., [2004], Just reinforce the pact, [w:] How should the Stability and Growth Pact be reformed?, Finance & Development, June.
• Warin T., [2004], Should Europe get rid of Stability and Growth Pact?, Middlebury College, Economics Discussion Paper No. 04-15.
• Walton D., [2004], Time for radical surgery, [w:] How should the Stability and Growth Pact be reformed?, Finance & Development, June.
• Wren-Lewis S., [2000], The limits of discretionary fiscal stabilisation policy, Oxford Review of Economic Policy Vol. 16, No. 4.
• Wypłosz C., [2002], Fiscal policy in EMU: Rules or institutions?, Paper prepared for the Group of Economic Analysis of the European Commission.
• Zsolt de Sousa H., [2004], The future of the Stability and Growth Pact as a tool of economic policy co-ordination, Groupement d'etudes et recherches Notre Europe, Policy Paper No. 9.