Doktryna George'a W. Busha źródłem rozłamu w stosunkach euroatlantyckich

• Autorzy: Jolanta Bryła

Warianty tytułu

The Doctrine of George W. Bush as a Source of Split in the Euro-Atlantic Relations

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

Artykuł omawia źródła, przyczyny i sposób prowadzenia polityki przez administrację G. Busha w kontekście relacji transatlantyckich. Skupiając się na kwestii irackiej autorka opisuje prawdopodobny przebieg relacji USA-UE oraz jego konsekwencje.

EN

This article discusses the origin, contents and impact of the Bush doctrine on the relations between the United States and Europe. The Iraqi war showed a separation of standpoints on many fundamental international issues. It also exposed disagreement on the means of conducting politics. The split results not only from a disproportion in power between the U.S. and Europe but also from a different perception of threat, values, ideological differences and dynamics of internal policy on both sides of the Atlantic. However, in spite of all the difficulties, America and Europe are still strongly connected and transatlantic relations remain a driving force of world policy (also economic). Many common global threats should induce partners to combine their assets: American military power and European ties with various regions, supported by diplomatic skills which would legitimize the Bush administration policy.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Polityka; Dyplomacja; Wojna w Iraku 2003; Stosunki międzynarodowe

EN

Politics; Diplomacy; War in Iraq in 2003; International relations

• Czasopismo: Przegląd Zachodni
• Rocznik: 2005
• Numer: nr 4
• Strony: 33--60

Twórcy

autor

Jolanta Bryła

Bibliografia

• Albright M., Bridges, Bombs, Bluster? "Foreign Affairs" September/October 2003
• Alvarez A., The Monroe Doctrine: Its Importance in the International Life of the States of the New World, Oxford University Press, New York 1924
• Baker G., Dempsey J., Graham R., Peel Q., Turner M., The US has come to see the status quo as inherently dangerous. "The Financial Times" 30 May 2003
• Barber B. R., Fear's Empire. War, Terrorism, and Democracy, W. W. Norton, New York 2003
• Bemis S. F., John Quincy Adams and the Foundations of American Foreign Policy, Alfred A. Knopf, New York 1956
• Blinken J., The False Crisis Over the Atlantic. "Foreign Affairs" May/June 2001
• Bromley M., Grahame D., Kucia Ch., Bunker Busters: Washington's Drive for New Nuclear Weapons, British American Security Information Council. Basic Research Report 2002. 2 July 2002
• Brooks S.G.,. Wohlforth W.C., American Primacy in Perspective, "Foregin Affairs" (July/August) 2002
• Bryła J., Uwarunkowania i implikacje amerykańskiej interwencji zbrojnej w Panamie w grudniu 1989 roku, Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek, Toruń-Poznań 1993
• Conetta C., Knight Ch., Dueling with Uncertainty: the New Logic of American Military Planning. Project on Defense Alternatives, Commonwealth Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, February 1998
• Deutsch K. W. i in., Political Community and the North Atlantic Area: International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ 1957
• Drozdiak W., The North Atlantic Drift. "Foreign Affairs" January/February 2005
• EMKA, Warszawa 2003
• Gaddis J. L., Grand Strategy in the Second Term. "Foreign Affairs" January/February 2005
• Gazeta Wyborcza 22 XII 2004
• Haass R. N., Multilateralism for a Global Era. Washington, 14 November 2001. Źródło: www.state.gOV/s/p/rem/6134.htm
• Hagel Ch., A Republican Foreign Policy. "Foreign Affairs" July/August 2004
• Hassner P., The United States: The Empire of Force or the Force of Empire? "Chaillot Papers" nr 54, Paris, Institute for Security Studies European Union, September 2002
• Herd G. P., Variable Geometry & Dual Enlargement: From the Baltic to the Black Sea, October 2003
• Hirsh M., Bush and the World. "Foreign Affairs" September/October 2002
• http://truthout.org/
• Huntington S. P., The Lonely Superpower, "Foreign Affairs" March-April 1999
• Ikenberry J. G., America's Imperial Ambition, "Foreign Affairs" 81 (5) 2002
• Joetze G., Doctrine and Practice of Preventive War. Its Impact on European Security, Peace Research Institute, Frankfurt 2004, s. 22. Źródło: www.hsfk.de/downloads/PRIF-70.pdf
• Kagan R., Potęga i Raj. Ameryka i Europa w nowym porządku świata, Wydawnictwo Studio EMKA, Warszawa 2002
• Leffler M. P., Bush's Foreign Policy. "Foreign Policy", September 2004
• Lemann N., The Next World Order. "The New Yorker" April 1, 2002. Źródło: J. Brecher, Terminating the Bush Juggernaut, May 2003. www.fpit.org/pdf/papers/DPjuggernaut.pdf
• Lobe J., Costs of war by far outweigh benefits. "Asia Times", 21 March 2003
• Lyndley-French J., Terms of Engagement: The Paradox of American Power and the Transatlantic Dilemma Post 11 September 2001. "Chaillot Paper" 52, May 2002
• Marshall W., The Bush Doctrine: A Preemptive Path to Peace or Recipe for Perpetual War? "American Experiment Quarterly" Vol. 6, No 2, Summer 2003
• Mead W. R., Special Providence: American Foreign Policy and How It Changed the World. New York (Knopf) 2001
• Moravcsik A., Dream On, America. "Newsweek" January 2005
• Mufson S., The Way Bush Sees the World. "Washington Post" February 17, 2002
• New Pentagon Europe Policy. Źródło: http://lists.peacelink.it/armamenti/msg00381.html
• Nossel S., Smart Power. "Foreign Affairs" March/April 2004
• Nye J. S., The Decline of America's Soft Power. "Foreign Affairs" May/June 2004
• O'Hanlon M. E., Rice S. E., Steinberg J. B., The New National Security Strategy and Preemption, Policy Brief