Ustrukturalizowany wywiad behawioralny - alternatywa dla tradycyjnego wywiadu kwalifikacyjnego

• Autorzy: Beata Chorągwicka

Warianty tytułu

The Structured Behavioral Interview: An Alternative to the Conventional Interview

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

Artykuł ten stanowi podsumowanie kluczowych badań naukowych na temat wywiadu kwalifikacyjnego. W szczególności skupia się on na rozróżnieniu Tradycyjnego Wywiadu (Conventional Interview) od Ustrukturalizowanego Wywiadu Behawioralnego (Structured Behaviour Interview oraz na przedstawieniu silnych i słabych punktów każdej z tych metod selekcji personelu. Punktem centralnym opracowania są właściwości psychometryczne obu typów wywiadu: są one porównane pod względem trafności i rzetelności. Na koniec przedstawione są wniosku, jakie wynikają z tego przeglądu literatury dla stosowania wywiadu w procesach selekcji personelu. (abstrakt oryginalny)

EN

This article is a summary of key scientific research into qualifying interviews. It particularly focuses on differentiating between the "conventional interview" and the structured behavioral interview as well as on presenting the strengths and weaknesses of each of these methods of personnel selection. The core of the article looks at the psychometric properties of both interview types and compares them in terms of accuracy and reliability. The final part presents conclusions derived from a review of literature involving the application of interviews in recruitment processes. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Pracownicy w przedsiębiorstwie; Rozmowa kwalifikacyjna; Kryteria rekrutacji pracowników; Rekrutacja pracowników

EN

Employees in enterprise; Job interview; Recruitment criteria; Employee recruitment

• Czasopismo: Zarządzanie Zasobami Ludzkimi
• Rocznik: 2007
• Numer: nr 5
• Strony: 137--160

Twórcy

autor

Beata Chorągwicka

Bibliografia

• American Psychological Association, American Educational Research Association, y National Council on Measurement in Education (1999), Standards for educational and psychological test y manuals, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
• Anderson N.R. (1992), Eight decades of employment interview research: a retrospective meta-review and prospective commentary, „European Work and Organizational Psychologist", Vol. 2(1), pp. 1-32.
• Arvey R.D., Campion J.E. (1982), The employment interview: a Summary and review of recent research, „Personnel Psychology", 35, pp. 281-322.
• Campion M.A., Campion J.E., Hudson J.P. Jr. (1994), Structured interviewing: a note on incremental validity and alternative question types, „Journal of Applied Psychology", Vol. 79(6), pp. 98-102.
• Campion M.A., Pursell E.D., Brown B.K. (1988), Structured interviewing: Raising the psychometric properties of employment interview, „Personnel Psychology", Vol. 41, pp. 25-42.
• Carrier M.R., Dalessio A.T., Brown S.H. (1990), Correspondence between estimates of content and criterion-related validity values, „Personnel Psychology", Vol. 43, pp. 85-100.
• Chorągwicka B., Moscoso S. (2007), Validacion de Contenido de una Entrevista Conductual Estructurada, Revista de Psicologia del Trabajo y de las Organizations, Vol. 23(1), pp. 75-92.
• Conway J.M, Jako R.A., Goodman D.F. (1995), A meta-analysis ofinterrater and internal consistency reliability of selection interviews, „Journal of Applied Psychology", Vol. 80(5), pp. 565-579.
• Conway J.M, Peneno G.M. (1999), Comparing structured interview question types: construct validity and applicant reactions, „Journal of Business and Psychology" Vol. 13(4), pp. 485- 506.
• Crocker L., Algina J. (1986), Introduction to classical and modem test theory, CBS College Publishing, New York.
• DeleryJ.E, Wright P.M., McArthur I.C., Anderson B.C. (1994), Cognitive ability tests and the situational interview: a test of incremental validity, „International Journal of Selection and Assessment", Vol. 2(1), pp. 53-58.
• Di Milia L., Gorodecki M. (1997), Some factors explaining the reliability of a structured interview system at a worksite, „International Journal of Selection and Assesment", Vol. 4(4), pp. 193-199.
• Dipboye R.L. (1992), Selection interviewers: Process perspectives, South-Western, Cincinnati, OH.
• Dunette M.D. (1966), Personnel Selection and Placement, Wadsworth Belmont, CA.
• Flanagan J.C. (1954), The critical incidents technique, „Psychological Bulletin", Vol. 51, pp. 327-358.
• Green P.C., Hogan D.D. (1982), Behavioral Interviewing, Memphis, TN.
• Harris M.M. (1989), Reconsidering the employment interview: a review of recent literature and suggestions for future research, „Personnel Psychology", Vol. 42, pp. 691-725.
• Huffcutt A.I., Arthur W. Jr. (1994), Hunter Hunter (1984) revisited: Interview validity for entry-level jobs, „Journal of Applied Psychology", Vol. 79, pp. 184-190.
• Hunter J.E, Hirsh H.R. (1987), Applications of meta-analysis [in:] International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cooper C.L., Robertson LT. (ed.), Wiley, Londres.
• Hunter J.E., Hunter R.F. (1984), Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance, „Psychological Bulletin", Vol. 96, pp. 72-98.
• Janz T. (1977), The behaviour based patterned interview: an effective alternative to the warm smile selection interview, Kompendium z corocznej Konferencji Kanadyjskiego Stowarzyszenia Nauk Administracyjnych.
• Janz T. (1982), Initial comparisons of patterned behavior description interview versus unstructured interviews, „Journal of Applied Psychology", Vol. 67, pp. 577-580.
• Janz T. (1989), The Patterned Behavior Description Interview: The best prophet of the future is the past [w:] Eder R.W., Ferris G.R. (ed.), The employment interview: Theory, research and practise, Sage, Beverly Hills, pp. 158-168.
• Janz T., Hellervik L., Gilmore D.C. (1986), Behaviour description interviewing: new, accurate, cost-effective, Allyn and Bacon, Boston.
• Latham G.P. (1989), The reliability, validity and practicality of the situational interview, [w:] (ed.) Eder R.W., Ferris G.R., Sage, The employment interview: Theory, research and practise, Beverly Hills, pp. 169-182.
• Latham G.P., Saari IM., Purseil E.D., Campion M.A. (1980), The situational interview, „Journal of Applied Psychology", Vol. 65, pp. 422-427
• Latham G.P., Saari I. M. (1984), Do people do what they say? Further studies on the situational interview, „Journal of Applied Psychology", Vol. 69, pp. 559-573.
• Latham G.P., Skarlicki D. (1995), Criterion-related validity of the situational and patterned behaviour description interviews with organizational citizenship behaviour, „Human Performance", Vol. 8, pp. 67-80. '-
• Lawshe C.H. (1975), A quantitative approach to content validity, „Personnel Psychology", Vol. 28, pp. 563-575.
• Locke E.A. (1968), Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives, „Organizational Behavior and Human Performance", Vol. 3, pp. 157-189.
• MayfieldE.C. (1964), The selection interview: Are-evaluation of published research, „Personnel Psychology", Vol. 17, pp. 239-260.
• McDaniel M.A., Whetzel D.L., Schmidt F.L., and Maurer S.D. (1994), The validity of employment interviews: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis, „Journal of Applied Psychology > Vol. 79 (4), pp. 599-616.
• Moscoso S., SalgadoJ.F. (2001), Psychometric properties of a structured interview to hire private security personnel, „Journal of Business and Psychology", Vol. 16(1), pp. 51-59.
• Motowidlo S.J., Carter G.W., Dunette M.D. Tippins N., Werner S., Burnett J.R, Vaughan J. (1992), Studies of structured behavioral interview, „Journal of Applied Psychology", Vol. 77, pp. 571-588.
• Quijano S. Diaz de (1992), Sistemas efectivos de evaluation rendimiento: Resultados desempeńos, PPU, Barcelona.
• ReillyR.R., Chao G.T. (1982), Validity and fairness of some alternative employee selection procedures, „Personnel Psychology", Vol. 35, pp. 1-62.
• Roth P.L., Van Iddekinge Ch.H., Huffcutt E.I., Edison C.I. Jr., Schmidt MJ. (2005), Personality Saturation in Structured Interviews, „International Journal of Selection and Assessment", Vol. 13(4), pp. 261-273.
• Rothstein H.R., Jackson D.N. (1980), Decision making in the employment interview. An experimental approach, „Journal of Applied Psychology", Vol. 65, pp. 271-283.
• Salgado J.F., Moscoso S. (2001), Entrevista Conductual Estructurada de Selection de Personal. Teoria, präctica rentabilidad, Madrid, Piramidę.
• Salgado J.F., Moscoso S. (2002), Comprehensive meta-analysis of the construct validity of the employment interview, „European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology", Vol. 11 (3), pp. 299-324.
• Salgado J.F., Moscoso S., Gorriti M. (2003), Investigations sohre la Entrevista Conductual Estructurada (ECE) en la Selection de Personal en la Administration General del Pais Vasco: Meta-andlisis de la fiabilidad, „Revista de Psicologia de Trabajo y Organizaciones", Vol. 20 (2), pp. 107-139.
• Salgado J.F., Viswesvaran C., Ones D.S. (2001), Predictors used for personnel selection, [in:] Anderson N., Ones N.S., Sinangil H.K., Viswesvaran C. (ed.), „Handbook of industrial, work, and organizational psychology", Vol 1., Sage, London, UK, pp. 165-199.
• Schmidt F.L., Hunter J.E. (1998), The Validity and Utility of Selection Methods in Personal Research, „Psychological Bulletin", Vol. 124(2), pp. 262-274.
• Schmidt F.L., Rader M. (1999), Exploring the boundary conditions for interview validity: Meta-analytic validity findings for a new interview type, „Personnel Psychology", Vol. 29, pp. 79-101.
• Schmitt N. (1976), Social and situational determinants of interviews decisions: Implications for the employment interview, „Personnel Psychology", Vol. 29, pp. 79-101.
• Schmitt N., Ostroff C. (1986), Operationalizing the «behavioralconsistency» approach: Selection test development based on a content-oriented strategy, „Personnel Psychology", Vol. 39, pp. 91-108.
• Schüler H., Funke U. (1989), The interview as a multimodal procedure, [in:] The employment interview: Theory, research and practice, Eder E.W., Ferris G.R. (ed.), Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
• Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (2003), Principles for the validation and use of personnel selection procedures (4hed.), Dokument pdf., www.siop.org
• Smith P.C., Kendall L.M. (1963), translation of expectations: An approach to the construction of unambiguous anchors for rating scales, „Journal of Applied Psychology", Vol. 47, pp. 149-155.
• Taylor P.J., Small B. (2002), Asking applicants what they would do versus what they did do: A meta-analytic comparison of situational and past behaviour employment interview questions, „Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology", Vol. 75, pp. 277-294.
• Urlich L., Trumbo D. (1965), The selection interview since 1949, „Psychological Bulletin", Vol. 63, pp. 100-116.
• Van Iddekinge Ch.H., Raymark P, Eidson C.E., Attenweiler J. (2004), What Do Structured Selection Interviews Really Measure? The Construct Validity of Behavior Description Interviews, „Human Performance", Vol. 17(1), pp, 71-93.
• Wagner R. (1949), The employment interview: A critical review, „Personnel Psychology", Vol. 2, pp. 17-46.
• Wiener Y., Schneiderman M.L. (1974), Use a job information as a criterion in employment decisions of interviewers, „Journal of Applied Psychology", Vol. 59, pp. 699-704.
• Wiesner W.H., Cronshaw S.F. (1988), The moderating impact of interview format and'degree of structure on interview validity, „Journal of Occupational Psychology", Vol. 61, pp. 275-290.
• Wright O.K. Jr. (1969), Summary of research on the selection interview since 1964, „Personnel Psychology", Vol. 22, pp. 391-413.
• Wright P.M., Lichtenfels P.A., PursellE.D (1989), The structured interview: Additional studies andmeta-analysis, „Journal of Occupational Psychology", Vol. 62(1), pp. 91-199.