Przechylanie szal : autopoieza i rządzenie

• Autorzy: Andrew Dunsire

Warianty tytułu

Tipping the Balance : Autopoiesis and Governance

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

Społeczeństwo nowoczesne składa się z systemów, które charakteryzuje zamknięcie organizacyjne oraz samoodniesienie, co częściowo wyjaśnia powszechnie obserwowane niepowodzenia polityk regulacyjnych. W artykule omówiono cztery mechanizmy rządzenia lub sterowania systemami społecznymi, kompatybilne z ich własną autopoiezą: dotacje, partnerstwo z organizacjami pośredniczącymi, prawo refleksyjne oraz technikę interwencji publicznej (w artykule została ona określona mianem kolibracji). (fragment oryginalnego streszczenia)

EN

A modern society, according to autopoietic and other analyses, comprises social systems that show organizational closure and self-referentiality, partly explaining widely perceived regulatory failure. This article compares four possible mechanisms for governance or steering of such systems, compatible with their autopoiesis: the use of subsidy, partnership with intermediary bodies, reflexive law, and a technique of government intervention that is ancient and common but not recognized, here named collibration. Some social actors exist mainly to check and balance other actors (e.g., employers' organizations and trade unions, or buyers and sellers in a market) and are self-referential only as a pair system. This pair system is then self-policing but can be steered, within limits, by tipping the balance that is being maintained - as exemplified by price-loading taxes, cooling-off periods, and sport handicapping. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

System społeczny; Konflikty społeczne; Rynek; Dotacje; Przegląd literatury

EN

Social system; Social conflicts; Market; Grants; Literature review

• Czasopismo: Zarządzanie Publiczne / Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie
• Rocznik: 2007
• Numer: nr 2 (2)
• Strony: 39--65

Twórcy

autor

Andrew Dunsire

Bibliografia

• Arystoteles (1912). The politics (przeł. W. Ellis). London: Dent.
• Ashby W.R. (1956). An introduction to cybernetics. London: Chapman & Hall.
• Balch G.I. (1980). "The stick, the carrot and other strategies", w: J. Brigham, D.W. Brown (red.), Policy implementation: Penalties or incentives?. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
• Bardach E. (1977). The implementation game. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Bardach E. (1989). "Social regulation as a generic policy instrument", w: L.M. Salamon (red.), Beyond privatization: The tools of government action. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
• Bardach E., Kagan R.A. (1982). Going by the book: The problem of regulatory unreasonableness. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
• Barrett S, Fudge C. (red.) (1981). Policy and action. London: Methuen.
• Bayliss L.E. (1966). Living control systems. London: English Universities Press.
• Beavis S. (1993). "Eggar admits nuclear levy is anti-coal", Guardian z 12 listopada, s. 16.
• Beer S. (1980). "Preface", w: H.R. Maturana, EJ. Varela, Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel.
• Bercusson B. (1988). "Economic policy: State and private ordering", w: T. Daintith (red.), Law as an instrument of economic policy: Comparative and critical approaches. New York, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
• Berger S. (red.) (1986). Organizing interests in Western Europe: Pluralism, corporatism, and the transformation of politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Bernstein M.H. (1955). Regulating business by independent commission. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Breyer S. (1982). Regulation and its reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Brigham J., Brown D.W. (red.) (1980). Policy implementation: Penalties or incentives? Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
• Broekstra G. (1991). "Consistency, configuration, closure and change", w: R.J. In't Veld, L. Schaap, C.J.A.M. Termeer, M.J.W. van Twist (red.), Autopoiesis and configuration theory: New approaches to societal steering. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
• Bruijn J.A. de, Heuvelhof E.F. ten. (1991). "Policy instruments for steering autopoietic actors", w: R.J. In't Veld, L. Schaap, C.J.A.M. Termeer, M.J.W. van Twist (red.), Autopoiesis and configuration theory: New approaches to societal steering. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
• Buchanan J.M., Tullock G. (1962). The calculus of consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
• Coleman J.S. (1974). Power and the structure of society. New York: Norton.
• Coser L.A. (1956). The functions of social conflict. New York: Free Press, Boston: Routledge Kegan Paul.
• Crouch C. (1990). "United Kingdom: Tne rejection of compromise", w: G. Baglioni, C. Crouch (red.), European industrial relations: The challenge of flexibility. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
• Daintith T. (red.) (1988). Law as an instrument of economic policy: Comparative and critical approaches. New York, Berlin: de Gruyter.
• DeAngelis D.L., Post W.M., Travis C.C. (1986). Positive feedback in natural systems. New York, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
• Deutsch K. (1963). The nerves of government. New York: Free Press.
• Douglas M. (1982). In the active voice. Boston: Rout-ledge Kegan Paul.
• Dunleavy P. (1991). Democracy, bureaucracy and public choice. London, New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
• Dunsire A. (1990). "Holistic governance". Public Policy and Administration, nr 5, s. 3-18.
• Dunsire A. (1993a). "Modes of governance", w: J. Kooiman (red.), Modern governance: New government-society interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.
• Dunsire A. (1993b). Manipulating social tensions: Collibration as an alternative mode of government intervention (MPIFG Discussion Paper No. 93/7). Cologne, Germany: Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.
• Dyson K. (red.) (1992). The politics of regulation in Germany. London: Dartmouth.
• Edelman M. (1967). The symbolic uses of politici. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
• Edelman M. (1971). Politics as symbolic action. Chicago: Markham.
• Espejo R., Harnden RJ. (red.) (1989). The viable system model. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
• Fromm E. (1942). The fear of freedom. Boston: Routledge Kegan Paul.
• Galbraith J. K. (1967). The new industrial state. London: Hamish Hamilton.
• Galliher J.F., DeGregory J.L. (1985). Violence in Northern Ireland: Understanding protestant perspectives. Dublin: Gill & Macmillan.
• Gleick J. (1988). Chaos: Making a new science. London: Sphere.
• Goodin R.E. (1980). Manipulatory politics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
• Green T.H. (1895). Principles of political obligation. White Plains, NY: Longman.
• Gretschmann K. (1986). "Measuring the public sector: A contestable issue", w: F-X. Kaufmann, G. Majone, V. Ostrom, (red.), Guidance, control and evaluation in the public sector. New York, Berlin: de Gruyter.
• Habermas J. (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.
• Hanf K., Scharpf F.W. (red.). (1978). Interorganizational policy making. Beverly Hills, CA, London: Sage.
• Hayek F.A. von. (1944). The road to serfdom. Boston: Routledge Kegan Paul.
• Hood C.C. (1983). The tools of government. New York, London: Macmillan.
• Horowitz D.L. (1977). The courts and social policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
• Ingraham P.W., Kettl D.F. (red.). (1992). Agenda for excellence: Public service in America. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
• In't Veld R.J., Schaap L., Termeer C.J.A.M, Twist M.J.W. van (red.) (W^V). Autopoiesis and configuration theory: New approaches to societal steering. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
• Jantsch E. (1981). "Autopoiesis: A central aspect of dissipative self-organization", w: M. Zeleny (red.), Autopoiesis: A theory of living organization. New York: North Holland.
• Jessop B. (1992). "The economy, the state and the law: Theories of relative autonomy and autopoietic closure", w: G. Teubner A. Febbrajo (red.), State, law and economy as autopoietic systems: Regulation and autonomy in a new perspective (European Yearbook in the Sociology of Law 1991-1992). Milan: Dott. A Giuffré Editore.
• Jones R.W. (1973). Principles of biological regulation: An introduction to feedback systems. New York, London: Academic Press.
• Keeling D. (1972). Management in government. Boston: Allen and Unwin.
• Kickert W.J.M. (1991). "Applicability of autopoiesis to administration science", w: R.J. In't Veld, L.Schaap, C.J.A.M. Termeer, M.J.W. van Twist (red.), Autopoiesis and configuration theory: New approaches to societal steering. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
• Koppen I.J. (1991). "Environmental mediation: An example of applied autopoiesis?, w: R.J. In't Veld, L. Schaap, C.J.A.M. Termeer, M.J.W. van Twist (red.), Autopoiesis and configuration theory: New approaches to societal steering. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
• Lasswell H.D. (1951). The world revolution of our time. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
• Lasswell H.D., Fox M.B. (1979). The signature of power: Buildings, communication and policy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
• Laszlo E. (1986). "Systems and societies: The basic cybernetics of social evolution", w: F. Geyer,J. van der Zouwen (red.), Sociocybernetic paradoxes: Observation, control and evolution of self-steering systems. Beverly Hills: Sage.
• Lehmbruch G. (1991). "The organization of society, administrative strategies, and policy networks", w: R. Czada, A. Windhorf-Heritier (red.), Political choice: Institutions, rules and the limits of rationality. Frankfurt, Germany: Campus Verlag and Boulder, CO: Westview.
• Lorenz K. (1966). On aggression (przeł. M. Letzke). London: Methuen.
• Luhmann N. (1966). Grundrechte als Institution. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
• Luhmann N. (1981). Politische Theorie im Wohlfahrtsstaat. München: Olzog.
• Luhmann N. (1982). The differentiation of society. New York: Columbia University Press.
• Luhmann N. (1985). Soziale Systeme: Grundriße einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.
• Luhmann N. (1986). "The autopoiesis of social systems", w: F. Geyer, J. van der Zouwen (red.), Sociocybernetic paradoxes: Observation, control and evolution of self-steering systems. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
• Luhmann N. (1988). "Closure and openness: On reality in the world of law", w: G. Teubner (red.), Autopoietic law. Berlin: de Gruyter.
• Marin B., Mayntz R. (red.) (1991). Policy networks: Empirical evidence and theoretical considerations. Frankfurt, Germany: Campus Verlag.
• Marsh D., Rhodes R.A.W. (red.) (1991). Policy networks in British government. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
• Maturana H.R., Varela F.J. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel.
• Mayntz R. (1979). "Regulative Politik in der Krise?", w: J. Matthes (red.), Sozialer Wandel in Westeuropa. Verhandlungen des 19. Deutschen Soziologentags in Berlin 1979. Frankfurt, Germany: Campus Verlag.
• Mayntz R. (1980). "Die Entwicklung des analytischen Paradigmas der Implementationsforschung", w: R. Mayntz (red.), Implementation politischer Programme I. Königstein/Ts, Germany: Anton Hain.
• Mayntz R. (1983a). "The conditions of effective public policy: A new challenge for policy analysis", Policy and Politics, nr 11, s. 123-143.
• Mayntz R. (1983b). "Implementation von regulativer Politik", w: R. Mayntz (red.), Implementation politischer Programme II: Ansätze zur Theoriebildung. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
• Mayntz R. (1993). "Governing failures and the problem of governability: Some comments on a theoretical paradigm", w: J. Kooiman (red.), Modern governance: New government-society interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
• Mazmanian D., Sabatier P. (red.) (1981). Effective policy implementation. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
• Mingers J. (1989). "An introduction to autopoiesis - implications and applications", Systems Practice, nr 2,s.l59-180.
• Mitnick B.M. (1980). The political economy of regulation: Creating, designing and removing regulatory forms. New York: Columbia University Press.
• Mohl R. (1862). Staatsrecht, Volkerrecht und Politik. Tübingen, Germany: Laupp.
• Morgan G. (1986). Images of organization. Beverly Hills: Sage.
• Noback C.R., Demarest R.J. (1982). The human nervous system: Basic principles of neurobiology (wyd. 3). New York, Tokyo: McGraw-Hill.
• Nonet P., Selznick P. (1978). Law and society in transition. New York: Harper & Row.
• Nordhaus W.D. (1975). "The political business cycle", Review of Economic Studies, nr 42,169-190.
• Offe C. (1986). "The attribution of public status to interest groups: Observations on the West German case", w: S. Berger (red.), Organizing interests in Western Europe: Pluralism, corporatism, and the transformation of politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.^ ^ Olson M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
• Osborne D., Gaebler T. (1992). Reinventing government. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley. ^ Ostrom V. (1974). The intellectual crisis in American public administration. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
• Pressman J., Wildavsky A. (1973). Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Rehn G., Viklund B. (1990). "Changes in the Swedish model", w: G. Baglioni C. Crouch (red.), European industrial relations: The challenge of flexibility. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
• Richardson J.J. (red.). (1982). Policy styles in Western Europe. Boston: Allen &, Unwin. ^ Rosenbloom D.H. (1986). Understanding management, politics and law in the public sector. New York: Random House.
• Ross E.A. (1920). The principles of sociology. New York: Century.
• Salamon L.M. (1981). "Rethinking public management: Third-party government and the changing forms of government action", Public Policy, nr 29, s. 256.
• Salamon L.M. (red.). (1989). Beyond privatization: The tools of government action. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
• Savas E.S. (red.) (1977). Alternatives of delivering public services. Boulder, CO: Westview.
• Schmitter PC. (1986). "Interest intermediation and regime governability in contemporary Western Europe and North America", w: S. Berger (red.), Organizing interests in Western Europe: Pluralism, corporatism, and the transformation of politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Schultze C.L. (1977). The public use of private interest. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.^ ^ Schwartz M., Thompson M. (1990). Divided we stand: Redefining politics, technology, and social choice. New York and London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
• Simmel G. (1955). Conflict (przeł. K.H. Wolff). New York: Free Press.
• Simon H.A., Smithburg D.W., Thompson V.A. (1950). Public administration. New York: Knopf.
• Spinoza B. de. (1958). "Tractatus politicus", w: A.G. Wenham (red), The political works (przeł. A.G. Wenham). Oxford: Clarendon.
• Stebut D. von. (1988). "Subsidies as an instrument of economic policy", w: T. Daintith (red.), Law as an instrument of economic policy: Comparative and critical approaches. New York, Berlin: de Gruyter.
• Stewart R.B. (1988). "Regulation and the crisis of legalisation in the United States", w: T. Daintith (red.), Law as an instrument of economic policy: Comparative and critical approaches. New York, Berlin: de Gruyter.
• Stigler G.J. (1971). "The theory of economic regulation", Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, nr 2, s. 3-21.
• Stigler G.J. (1975). The citizen and the state: Essays on regulation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
• Stone D. (1975). Where the law ends: The social control of corporate behavior. New York: Harper & Row.
• Streeck W. (1984). "Co-determination: The fourth decade", w: B. Wilpert, A. Sorge (red.), International perspectives on organizational democracy. New York: John Wiley.
• Teubner G. (1986). "After legal instrumentalism? Strategic models of post-regulatory Law", w: G. Teubner (red.), Dilemmas of law in the welfare state. New York, Berlin: de Gruyter.
• Teubner G. (1987). Juridification of social spheres. Berlin: de Gruyter.
• Teubner G. (red.) (1988) Autopoietic law: A new approach to law and society. New York, Berlin: de Gruyter.
• Teubner G. (1989). Recht als autopoietisches System. Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.
• Teubner G. (1992). "Social order from legislative noise? Autopoietic closure as a problem for legal regulation", w: G. Teubner, A. Febbrajo (red.), State, law and economy as autopoietic systems: Regulation ana autonomy in a new perspective (European Yearbook in the Sociology of Law 1991-1992, s. 609-649). Milan: Dott. A. Giuffré Editore.
• Teubner G., Febbrajo A. (red.) (1992). State, law and economy as autopoietic systems: Regulation and autonomy in a new perspective (European Yearbook in the Sociology of Law 1991-1992). Milan: Dott. A Giuffré Editore.
• Teubner G., Willke H. (1984). "Kontext und Autonomie: Gesellschaftliche Selbststeuerung durch reflexives Recht", Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie, nr 5, s. 4-35.
• Thompson M., Ellis R., Wildavsky A. (1990). Cultural theory. Boulder, CO: Westview. ^ Toates F.M. (1975). Control theory in biology and experimental psychology. London: Hutchinson Educational.
• Trubek D. (red.) (1983). Reflexive law and the regulatory crisis. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.^ ^ Van Twist M.J.W., Schaap L. (1991). "Introduction to autopoiesis theory and autopoietic steering", w: R.J. In't Veld, L. Schaap, C.J.A.M. Termeer, M.J.W. van Twist (red.), Autopoiesis and configuration theory: New approaches to societal steering. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.^ ^ Van Horn C. (1979). Policy implementation in the federal system. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
• Voigt R. (red.) (1980). Verrechtlichung: Analysen zu Funktion und Wirkung von Parlamentarisierung, Büro-kratisierung und Justizialisierung sozialer, politischer und ökonomischer Prozesse. Königstein/Ts, Germany: Athenaeum.
• Voigt R. (red.) (1983). Abschied vom Recht? Frankfurt a.M, Germany: Suhrkamp.
• Weber M. (1968). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
• Weidenbaum M.L. (1969). The modern public sector; new ways of doing the government's business. New York: Basic Books.
• Wight M., Bull H., Holbraad C. (red.) (1979). Power Politics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
• Willke H. (1982). Gesellschaftliche Kriterien ökonomischer Rationalität. Praca niepublikowana, University of Cologne.
• Willke H. (1983). Entzauberung des Staates. Überlegungen zu einer sozietalen Steuerungstheorie. Königstein, Germany: Athenäum Verlag.
• Zeleny M. (red.) (1981). Autopoiesis: A theory of living organization. New York: North Holland.
• Zifcak S. (1994). New managerialism: Administrative reform in Whitehall and Canberra. Buckingham, UK, Philadelphia: Open University Press.
• Zolo D. (1992). "The epistemological status of the theory of autopoiesis and its applications to the social sciences", w: G. Teubner, A. Febbrajo (red.), State, law and economy as autopoietic systems: Regulation and autonomy in a new perspective (European Yearbook in the Sociology of Law 1991-1992, s. 67-124). Milan: Dott. A. Giuffré Editore.