Zastosowanie diamentowego modelu przewagi konkurencyjnej Portera w identyfikacji potencjału innowacyjnego regionów

• Autorzy: Sascha Kraus , Michael Clarkson , Małgorzata A. Wdowiak , Matthias Fink

Warianty tytułu

Application of Porter's diamond model Of competitive advantage in identifying innovative potential of regions

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

Celem niniejszego artykułu jest identyfikacja potencjału innowacyjnego firm poprzez wykorzystanie diamentowego modelu przewagi konkurencyjnej Portera. Przedmiotem analizy są małe i średnie przedsiębiorstwa funkcjonujące w obrębie klastrów przemysłowych w dwu sąsiadujących ze sobą regionach: Branderburgii w Niemczech Wschodnich i województwie lubuskim w Polsce. Intencją autorów jest w szczególności wskazanie przedsiębiorcom i twórcom polityki regionalnej korzyści wynikających z wzajemnych interakcji.(abstrakt oryginalny)

EN

Using Porter's diamond model of competitive advantage, the paper aims to identify innovative potential of small and medium sized enterprises located in two regions of structural change: Brandenburg in Eastern Germany and Lubusz Province in Poland. A crucial intention of the authors is to demonstrate a catalyst effect of industrial cluster formation on firm innovation propensity and sustained regional development as well as to make entrepreneurs and local policy makers more conscious about advantages of reciprocal interactions.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Innowacyjność regionu; Klastry; Małe i średnie przedsiębiorstwa; Konkurencyjność regionów

EN

Regional innovation; Business cluster; Small business; Regions competitiveness

• Czasopismo: Organizacja i Kierowanie
• Rocznik: 2008
• Numer: nr 2
• Strony: 21--35

Twórcy

autor

Sascha Kraus

autor

Michael Clarkson

autor

Małgorzata A. Wdowiak

autor

Matthias Fink

Bibliografia

• [1] Aggestam M. (2004), Corporate Governance and Capital Groups in Poland, "Journal for East European Management Studies", 9, 4, s. 367-390.
• [2] Audretsch D.B., Stephan P.E. (1996), Company-Scientist Locational Links: The Case of Biotechnology, "American Economic Review", 86, 3, s. 641-652.
• [3] European Commission (ed.) (2005a), European Trend Chart on Innovation: Annual Innovation Policy Trends and Appraisal Report Poland 2004-2005, Enterprises Directorate of the European Commission, Brussels.
• [4] European Commission (ed.) (2005b), European Trend Chart on Innovation: Annual Innovation Policy Trends and Appraisal Report Germany 2004-2005, Enterprises Directorate of the European Commission, Brussels.
• [5] Eurostat (ed.) (2005), Eurostat News Release 13/2005, January 25th, 2005, Statistical Office of the European Communities, Luxemburg.
• [6] Hanson P., Pavitt K. (1987), The comparative Economics of Research Development and Innovation in East and West: A Survey. Chur: Harwood Academic Publishers.
• [7] Ionescu D. (2003), Cluster development in transition countries. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
• [8] Kewell B. (2002), Hidden drivers of organisational transformation in Poland: Survival networks amongst state owned and privatised firms in the early 1990s, "Journal for East European Management Studies", 7, 4, s. 373-393.
• [9] Koistinen D. (2002), The causes of deindustrialization: The migration of the cotton textile industry from New England to the South, w: Enterprise & Society, 3, 3, s. 482-519.
• [10] Kuratko D.F., Hodgetts R.M. (2004), Innovation and the entrepreneur, w: Kuratko, D.F./Hodgetts, R.M. (eds.) (2004), Entrepreneurship, 6. Mason, OH: Thomson, s. 138-50.
• [11] Lungwitz, R.-E., Preusche E. (2000), Pragmatische Organisationsgestaltung im Kontext von Branche und Land: Manager in Polen, Ostdeutschland und Tschechien im betrieblichen Transformationsprozeß, „Journal for East European Management Studies", 5, 3, s. 231-258.
• [12] Marshall A. (1890), Principles of Economics, 8. (1930), London: Macmillan
• [13] OECD (ed.) (2005), Compendium of Patent Statistics 2005. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
• [14] Porter M.E. (1990), The competitive Advantage of Nations, New York: Free Press.
• [15] Porter M.E. (1998a), Clusters and the New Economics of Competition, "Harvard Business Review", November-December, s. 77-90.
• [16] Porter M.E. (1998b), Clusters and Competition: New Agendas for Companies, Governments, and Institutions, w: Porter, M.E. (1990), On Competition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Review Books.
• [17] Porter M.E. (2000), Location, Competition, and Economic Development: Local Clusters in a Global Economy, "Economics Development Quarterly", 14, 1, s. 15-34.
• [18] Robinson I. (1999), The Dynamics of Change in a Privatised Polish State Owned Enterprise: An Analysis of the Human Resource Management Implications, "Journal for East European Management Studies", 4, 1, s. 28-44.
• [19] Robinson R., Tomczak-Stepien, B. (2000), Cultural Transformation at Enterprise Level: Case Study Evidence from Poland, "Journal for East European Management Studies", 5, 2, s. 130-151.
• [20] Schumpeter J.A. (1934), The Theory of Economic Development. New Brunswick, London: Transaction Publishers.