Czeskie parki narodowe - ich funkcjonowanie a ochrona przyrody

• Autorzy: Andrzej Ginalski

Warianty tytułu

Czech National Parks - Their Functioning and Nature Conservation

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

Parki narodowe są najbardziej znaną formą ochrony przyrody. W artykule zaprezentowano wyniki ankiety przeprowadzonej wśród dyrekcji parków narodowych w Republice Czeskiej, dotyczącej funkcjonowania parków narodowych i jego wpływu na ochronę przyrody. Pytania ankiety dotyczyły: planu ochrony, zatrudnienia w dyrekcji parków, finansów, roli parków narodowych w sieci Natura 2000, zagrożeń walorów przyrodniczych, przeszkód w sprawnym funkcjonowaniu parków oraz współpracy z różnymi grupami społecznymi.

EN

The paper presents the results of a survey carried out at three out of four National Park (NP) Authorities in the Czech Republic in March 2007. National parks have legal protection under the Nature Conservation and Landscape Protection Act of 1992 (Zákon č. 114/1992). The weakest point seems to be the low level of communication between NP Authorities and local communities which may result in serious conflicts. The parks' need to employ people with good communication skills is very important, as revealed in the survey. Additional employees with specialized skills in management, law, tourism or town and country planning would be also very helpful. Almost 2/3 of the parks' income comes from the state budget. All of the parks discussed herein have been designated as both Special Protection Areas and Special Areas of Conservation within the "Nature 2000" protection framework. Park authorities are responsible for protecting Nature 2000 sites within their parks' boundaries. The biggest threats to the parks' natural environment are excessive tourist activity and the related pressure to invest in tourist infrastructure in the NPs and their vicinity. Other threats include uncontrolled residential development as well is air, water, and soil pollution. The first two threats, along with changing and use (intensifying agriculture, neglect of some areas, etc.), seem to pose the biggest problem for parks in the next five years. Social misconceptions about the real purpose of NPs and related tourist expectations tend to contradict the need for nature conservation. Such misconceptions were identified as the biggest obstacles о the effective functioning of NPs. Out of the various social groups that an be designated as stakeholders, it is the media and scientists that NP Authorities cooperate most closely with. Unfortunately, there is poor cooperation with зсаі communities. Some volunteer work geared towards the protection of the NPs' natural environment is performed by school children, college students, and special brigades but the magnitude of the effort is relatively modest in comparison with what s found in Western Europe. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Ochrona środowiska; Finansowanie ochrony środowiska; Rola państwa w ochronie środowiska; Parki narodowe; Program Natura 2000; Ochrona przyrody

EN

Environmental protection; Environmental protection financing; Role of the state in environmental protection; National parks; Natura 2000 Networking Programme; Nature protection

• Czasopismo: Prace Geograficzne / Instytut Geografii i Gospodarki Przestrzennej Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
• Rocznik: 2009
• Numer: z. 121
• Strony: 135--145

Twórcy

autor

Andrzej Ginalski

Bibliografia

• Adams A.B. (red.), 1962, First world conference on national parks. Proceedings of a conference organized by IUCN- Seattle, Washington, June 30- July 7, 1962, National Park Service, United States Department of the Interior, Washington D.C., XXXIV, 471.
• Bishop K., Green M., Phillips A., 1998, Models of: National Parks. Scottish Natural Heritage Review No. 105, Scottish Natural Heritage, Battleby, Redgorton, Perth, 154.
• Drozd J., Kočka P., Votápek A. (red.), 2007, Ročenka Správy Národního parku České Švýcarsko, Správa Národního parku České Švýcarsko, Krásná Lípa, 96.
• IUCN, 1994a, Guidelines for Protected Areas Management Categories, Cambridge (UK) and Gland (Switzerland), 261.
• IUCN, 1994b, Parks for life. Action for Protected Areas in Europe, Gland (Switzerland) and Cambridge (UK), 154.
• IUCN, 1998,1997 United Nations List of Protected Areas, Prepared by WCMC and WCPA.
• IUCN, Gland Switzerland and Cambridge, UK, LXII, 412.
• Ministerstvo životního prostředí a Český statistický úřad, 2007, Statistickd ročenka íivotního prostředí České' republiky 2006, Praha, 640.
• Peterová P, Roth P., 2007, Statistika Natury 2000 v České'republice a EU, [w:] Ochrana Přírody 62, č. 2, Agentura ochrany přírody a krajiny České republiky, Praha, II-IV.
• PlesníkJ., Staňková J. (ed.), 2001, Status od Biological Resources and Implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity in the Czech Republic. First Report, Ministry of the Environment of the Czech Republic, Prague, 72.
• United Nations Environment Program - World Conservation Monitoring Centre, 2007, Guidelines for Protected Areas Management Categories (document online http://www.unep-wcmc.org/protected_areas/categories/index.html, 17.07.2007)
• Zákon č. 114/1992 Sb., o ochraně přírody a krajiny (treść według stanu na dzień 20.11.2006)