Awangarda feministyczna w naukach o zarządzaniu - refleksje maskulinistyczne

• Autorzy: Łukasz Sułkowski

Warianty tytułu

Feminist Avant-garde in Management Sciences - a Masculin Approach

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

Celem artykułu jest przeprowadzenie analizy użyteczności poznawczej i zastosowań praktycznych nurtu radykalnego feminizmu w naukach o zarządzaniu, w których perspektywa radykalnego feminizmu splata się z nurtem krytycznym oraz podejściem postmodernistycznym. Krytykę prowadzoną w ramach tych podejść charakteryzuje radykalizm, ale zarazem oryginalne i prowokacyjne ujęcie podstawowych problemów zarządzania, które skłaniają do podjęcia refleksji i polemiki. (abstrakt oryginalny)

EN

The purpose of the paper is to conduct the analysis of cognitive usefulness and practical applications of the radical trend of feminism in management sciences. In accordance with the assumptions of epistemology of radical feminism we are not able in our considerations to set free from cultural and biological conditioning. The reflections, although based mainly on American literature, are confronted with Polish organizational practice. Of course, in no way am I able to get rid of the biased thinking about feminism related to my gender. Not ironically, however, I will try to take on a little distance and in spite of being aware of cultural relativism and determinism of sexes, I will try to carry out a balanced assessment of the significance of the idea of radical feminism for management sciences. The considerations refer to the epistemology of radical feminism, where the theoretical consequences of mat orientation for management are derived from and their practical impact on the methodology or organizational research. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Zarządzanie; Teorie zarządzania; Rozwój nauki; Równouprawnienie kobiet i mężczyzn

EN

Management; Management theories; Development of science; Equal rights for women and men

• Czasopismo: Współczesne Zarządzanie
• Rocznik: 2007
• Numer: nr 3
• Strony: 13--21

Twórcy

autor

Łukasz Sułkowski

Bibliografia

• 1. Alston M., (2003), Breaking Through the Glass Ceiling, Routledge, London.
• 2. Ardener E., (1975), Belief and the Problem of Women, [w:] Ardener S. (red.), Perceiving Women, Malaby, London.
• 3. Brewis J., Linsted S., (2000), Sex, Work and Sex Work: Eroticizing Organization, Routledge, London.
• 4. Burrell G., (1984), Sex and Organisational Analysis, "Organization Studies" nr 5 (2).
• 5. Butler J., (2004), Undoing Gender, Routledge, London.
• 6. Calás M., Smircich L., (1991), Voicing Seduction to Silence Leadership, "Organization Studies" nr 12 (4).
• 7. Czarniawska B., Höpfl H. (red.), (2002), Casting the Other: the Production and Maintenance of Inequalities in Work Organizations, Routledge, London.
• 8. Fuller S., (2002), Social Epistemology, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
• 9. Haraway D., (1990), Primate Visions: Gender Race and Nature in the Word of Modern Science, Routledge, London.
• 10. Glennon L.M., (1983), Synthesism. A Case of Feminist Methodology, [w:] Morgan G. (red.), Beyond Method. Strategies for Social Research, Sage, Beverly Hills, London, New Delhi.
• 11. Harding S., (1986), The Science Question in Feminism, Open University Press, Buckingham.
• 12. Harding S., (1991), Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women's Experience, Open University Press, Buckingham.
• 13. Keller E.F., (1993), Secrets of Life, Secrets of Heath. Essays on Gender, Language and Science, Routledge, London.
• 14. Kramarae Ch., (1981), Women and Men Speaking, Newbury House, Rowley.
• 15. Kramarae Ch., Treichler P., (1992), Amazons, Bluestockings, and Crones: A Feminist Dictionary, Pandora, London.
• 16. Lennon K., (2004), Feminist Epistemology, [w:] Morgan G. (red.), Handbook of Epistemology, Sage, Beverly Hills, London, New Delhi.
• 17. Longino H., (1997), In Search of Feminist Epistemology, "PASS", vol. LXXI.
• 18. Lukács G., (1971), History and Class Consciousness, Merlin, London, (reprint z 1919).
• 19. Lyotard J.F., (1997), Kondycja ponowoczesna. Raport o stanie wiedzy, Fundacja Altheia, Warszawa.
• 20. Mintzberg H., (1991), A Letter to Maria Calás and Linda Smircich, "Organization Studies" nr 12 (4).
• 21. Monin N., (2004), Management Theory. A Critical and Reflective Reading, Routledge, London - New York.
• 22. Oakley A., (2000), Experiments in Knowing. Gender and Method in the Social Sciences, The New Press, New York.
• 23. Pringle R., (2005), Sexuality at Work, [w:] Grey Ch., Willmot H. (red.), Critical Management Studies. A Reader, Oxford University Press, New York.
• 24. Rose H., Rose S., (1976), The Political Economy and the Natural Sciences, Macmillan, London.
• 25. Sokal A., Bricmont J., (1998), Modne bzdury. O nadużywaniu pojęć z zakresu nauk ścisłych przez postmodernistycznych intelektualistów, Prószyński i s-ka, Warszawa.
• 26. Spivak G.C., (2003), Heath of a Discipline, Columbia University Press, New York.
• 27. Stringer E.T., (1999), Action Research, Sage, London.
• 28. Szałkowski A., (2002), Problem mobbingu w stosunkach pracy, PiZS nr 9.
• 29. Warylewski J., (1999), Molestowanie seksualne w miejscu pracy, Sopot, Internet: www.panda.bg.univ.gda.pl
• 30. Wood J.T., (1997), Communication Theories in Action, Wadsworth, Belmont.