Rzetelność i trafność w badaniach jakościowych : ocena jakości danych

• Autorzy: Barbara Worek

Warianty tytułu

Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research : Data Quality Evaluation.

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

Przedstawiono dyskusję nad sposobem ujmowania trafności i rzetelności z perspektywy metodologii badań jakościowych oraz omówiono strategie służące zwiększeniu wiarygodności tych badań. (fragment tekstu)

EN

All researchers should endeavor to conduct rigorous studies, regardless whether they use qualitative or quantitative techniques. However, qualitative researchers face a challenge because standards for assessing the quality of qualitative research are still much less clearly defined than standards for quantitative work. Researchers using qualitative methods do not have sufficient guidelines to help them design and implement rigorous studies. To address some of these concerns, in this article we discuss the problem of validity and reliability in qualitative research, present main factors which can influence the quality of data and, lastly, offer a number of strategies for increasing the reliability and validity of qualitative research designs. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Badanie jakościowe; Ocena jakości; Wiarygodność; Analiza danych

EN

Qualitative research; Quality assessment; Credibility; Data analysis

• Czasopismo: Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu
• Rocznik: 2009
• Numer: nr 51 Projektowanie, ocena i wykorzystanie danych rynkowych
• Strony: 136--147

Twórcy

autor

Barbara Worek

• Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

Bibliografia

• Agar M.H., Speaking of ethnography, Sage, London 1986.
• Babbie H.. Badania społeczne w praktyce, PWN, Warszawa 2003.
• Burke Johnson R., Examining the validity structure of qualitative research. Education, Winter 1997 (FindArticles.com. 22.08.2008), http://findarticles.eom/p/articles/mi_qa3673/is_199701/ai_n8754064.
• Campbell T., Technology, multimedia, and qualitative research in education, "Journal of Research on Computing in Education" 1996, no. 30 (9), s. 122-133.
• Clont J.G., The concept of reliability as it pertains to data from qualitative studies, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the South West Educational Research Association, Houston, TX, 1992.
• Creswell J.W., Research design: qualitative & quantitative approaches, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks 1994.
• Denzin N.K., The research act: theoretical introduction to sociological methods, Prentice Hall, Engle-wood Cliffs, NJ 1989.
• Eisner E.W., The enlightened eye: qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice, Macmillan Publishing Company, New York, NY 1991.
• Frankfort-Nachmias Ch., Nachmias D., Metody badawcze w naukach społecznych, Zysk i S-ka, Poznań 2001.
• Golafshani N., Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research, The Qualitative Report 2003, 8(4), 597-606, http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR8-4/golafshani.pdf (22.08.08).
• Glaser B.G., Strauss A.L., The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research, Aldine de Gruyter, New York 1967.
• Guba E.G., Lincoln Y, Effective evaluation: Improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approaches, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA 1981.
• Hammersley M., What's wrong with ethnography?, Routledge, London 1992.
• Hcaly M., Perry C, Comprehensive criteria to judge validity and reliability of qualitative research within the realism paradigm, "Qualitative Market Research" 2000, no. 3 (3), s. 118-126.
• Kirk J., Miller M.L., Reliability and validity in qualitative research, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills 1986.
• LeCompte M.D., Goetz J.P., Problems of reliability and validity in ethnographic research, "Review of Educational Research" 1982, no. 52(1), s. 31-60.
• Lincoln YS., Guba E.G., Naturalistic inquiry, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA 1985.
• Maxwell J.A., Understanding and validity in qualitative research, "Harvard Educational Review" 1992, no. 62(3), s. 279-300.
• Miles M.B., Huberman A.M., Analiza danych jakościowych, Trans Humana, Białystok 2000.
• Patton M.Q., Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 3rd ed., Sage Publications, Inc. Thousand Oaks, CA 2002.
• Seale C, Quality in qualitative research, "Qualitative Inquiry" 1999, no. 5 (4), s. 465-478.
• Stake R.E., Situational context as influence on evaluation design and use, "Studies in Educational Evaluation" 1990 16, 231-246.
• Stenbacka C, Qualitative research requires quality concepts of its own, "Management Decision" 2001, no. 39 (7), s. 551-555.
• Winter G., A comparative discussion of the notion of 'validity' in qualitative and quantitative research. The qualitative report, vol. 4, no. 3, 4, March 2000, (http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR4-3/wintcr. html).
• Yin R.K., Case study research: design and methods, Sage, Newbury Park 1994.