PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2009 | nr 1 (22) | 5--54
Tytuł artykułu

Income Distribution, Growth and Wellbeing : Evidence of a Quantitative Approach for Selected OECD Countries

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
In this paper we provide evidence on the cross-country and intertemporal dynamics of aggregate welfare. Firstly, we apply and compare alternative inequality indexes to have an insight on the actual within-country income distribution. The same measures, combined with information on average incomes, are then used to quantify the impact of inequality on social welfare and to obtain a comparative assessment of well-being levels, determined according to Bernoulli’s hypothesis, across space and time. The empirical application has been carried out on 10 selected OECD countries for the period 1970-2000, using a dataset that combines comparable data on per capita incomes from Penn World Tables with income distribution information drawn from the World Income Inequality Database. The results obtained highlight how inequality-accounting welfare measures significantly modify the perception of well-being, affecting both the within-country evolution of aggregate welfare and inter-countries well-being levels. Finally, for selected sub-periods, the issue of progressivity of income growth process has been considered to evaluate whether or not income growth leads to lower inequality over time. (original abstract)
Rocznik
Numer
Strony
5--54
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • University of Perugia, Italy
  • University of Perugia, Italy
  • University of Perugia, Italy
Bibliografia
  • Ackland, R., Dowrick, S., Freyens, B., Measuring Global Poverty: Why PPP Methods Matter, Paper presented at the Conference of the International Association for Research in Income and Wealth (August 26), Cork, Ireland, 2004.
  • Ahluwalia, M., Chenery, H., The economic framework, in Redistribution with Growth, ed. by H. Chenery, et al. Oxford University Press, London, 1974.
  • Araar, A., Duclos, J.-Y., An Atkinson-Gini family of social evaluation functions, “Economics Bulletin”, 3, pp. 1-16, 2003.
  • Araar, A., Duclos, J.-Y., An Atkinson-Gini Family of Social Evaluation Functions: Theory and Illustration using Data from the Luxembourg Income Study, LIS Working Paper 416, 2005.
  • Arrow, K. J., Social Choice and Individual Values. Yale University Press, New Haven, 1951.
  • Atkinson, A. B., On The Measurement of Inequality, “Journal of Economic Theory”, 2, pp. 244–263, 1970.
  • Atkinson, A. B., Brandolini, A., Promise and pitfalls in the use of ‘secondary’ datasets: income inequality in OECD countries as a case study, “Journal of Economic Literature”, 39, pp. 771–99, 2001.
  • Becker, G. S., Murphy, K. M., Werning, I.,The equilibrium distribution of income and the market for status, “Journal of Political Economy”, 113, pp. 282–310, 2005.
  • Bergson, A., A Reformulation of Certain Aspects of Welfare Economics, “Quarterly Journal of Economics”, 52, pp. 310–334, 1938.
  • Bernoulli, D. (1738) Specimen theoriae novae de mensura sortis [published in English as: Exposition of a New Theory on the Measurement of Risk, 1954, Econometrica, 22, pp. 23-36].
  • Bhalla, S., Imagine There’s No Country: Poverty, Inequality, and Growth in the Era of Globalization, Institute for International Economics, Washington DC, 2002.
  • Boulding, K. E., Economics as a Science. McGraw-Hill, New York 1970.
  • Champernowne, D. G., A comparison of measures of inequality of income distribution, “The Economic Journal”, pp. 787-816, 1974.
  • Champernowne, D. G., The Graduation of lncome Distributions, “Econometrica”, 1952.
  • Chen, S., Ravallion, M., How Did the World’s Poorest Fare in the 1990s?, “Review of Income and Wealth”, 47(3), pp. 283-300, 2001.
  • Chen, S., Datt, G., Ravallion, M., PØVCAL, A program for calculating poverty measures for grouped data, Poverty and Human Resource Division, World Bank, 2001.
  • Crosara, A. A., La distribuzione dei redditi familiari nel pregiudizio e nel fatto contrapposti mediante modelli plastici, Studium, Roma 1959.
  • Dagum, C., On the relationship between income inequality measures and social welfare functions, “Journal of Econometrics”, 43, pp. 91–102, 1990.
  • Dalton, H., The Measurement of Inequality of Incomes, “Economic Journal”, 30, pp. 348-361, 1920.
  • d'Aspremont, C., Axioms for social welfare orderings, in Hurwicz, L., Schmeidler, D., Sonnenschein, H. (eds.): Social Goals and Social Organization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 19-76, 1985.
  • Datt, G., Computational Tools for Poverty Measurement and Analysis, International Food Policy Research Institute, Food Consumption and Nutrition Division Discussion Paper No. 50. 1998.
  • De Sismondi, C. S., Political economy and the philosophy of government. 1847.
  • Deininger, K., Squire, L., A new data set measuring income inequality, “The World Bank Economic Review”, 10(3), pp. 565-591, 1996.
  • Deininger, K., Squire, L., New ways of looking at old issues: inequality and growth, “Journal of Development Economics”, 57, 259–87, 1998.
  • Dhongde, S., On the Bias of Estimating Lorenz Curve Parameters, mimeo, Department of Economics, University of California, Riverside, 2004.
  • Dollar, D., Kraay, A., Growth is good for the poor, “Journal of Economic Growth”, 7, pp. 195-225, 2002.
  • Duesenberry, J. S., Income, Savings and the Theory of Consumer Behavior. Harvard University Press, 1952.
  • Ebert, U., Measurement of inequality: an attempt at unification and generalization, “Social Choice and Welfare”, 5, pp. 147-169, 1988.
  • Frank, R. H., The demand for unobservable and other nonpositional goods, “American Economic Review”, 75, pp. 101–116, 1985.
  • Gini, C., Variabilità e mutabilità, Bologna, Italy, 1912.
  • Graaf, J. de V., Theoretical Welfare Economics. Cambridge University Press, London, 1957.
  • Gruen, C., Klasen, S., Growth, income distribution and well-being in transition countries, “Economics of Transition”, 9, pp. 359–94, 2001.
  • Gruen, C., Klasen, S., Growth, inequality, and well-being: intertemporal and global comparisons, CESifo Economic Studies, 49, pp. 617–59, 2003.
  • Gruen, C., Klasen, S., Growth, inequality, and welfare: comparisons across space and time, “Oxford Economic Papers”, 60, pp. 212-236, 2007.
  • Heston, A., Summers, R., Aten, B. (2002) Penn world table version 6.1, Center for International Comparisons at the University of Pennsylvania (CICUP) http://pwt.econ.upenn.edu/.
  • Hey, J. D., Lambert P. J., Relative Deprivation and the Gini Coefficient: Comment, “Quarterly Journal of Economics”, 95, pp. 567–573, 1980.
  • Hopkins, E., Inequality, happiness and relative concerns: What actually is their relationship?, “Journal of Economic Inequality”, 6, pp. 351-372, 2008.
  • Jenkins, S. P., Trends in real income in Britain: a microeconomic analysis, “Empirical Economics”, 22, pp. 483–500, 1997.
  • Klasen, S., Growth and well-being: introducing distribution-weighted growth rates to reevaluate U.S. post-war economic performance, “Review of Income and Wealth”, 40, pp. 251–72, 1994.
  • Kolm, S. C., The optimal production of social justice, in Margolis, J. and Guitton, H. (eds.),Public Economics. MacMillan, London, pp. 145–200, 1969.
  • Lambert, P., The Distribution and Redistribution of Income. Basil Blackwell, London, 1989.
  • Lorenz, M. O., Methods of measuring the concentration of wealth, “Journal of the American Statistical Association”, 70, pp. 209–219, 1905.
  • Lovell, M. C., Inequality within and among nations, “Journal of Income Distribution”, 8, pp. 5-44, 1998.
  • Lundberg, M., Squire, L., The simultaneous evolution of growth and inequality, “The Economic Journal”, 113, pp. 326-344, 2003.
  • Malthus, T. R., An Essay on the Principle of Population. 1826.
  • Mill, J. S., On social freedom, “Oxford and Cambridge Review”, 1907.
  • Minoiu, C., Reddy, S., “Kernel Density Estimation in Poverty and Inequality Analysis: Validity and Robustness”, mimeo, Department of Economics, Columbia University, 2006.
  • Minoiu, C., Reddy, S., The Assessment of Poverty and Inequality through Parametric Estimation of Lorenz Curves: An Evaluation, “Journal of Income Distribution”, forthcoming, 2007.
  • Pigou, A. C., Wealth and Welfare. Macmillan, London, 1912.
  • Pigou, A.C. (1952) Essays in economics, Macmillan, London.
  • Rablen, M. D., Relativity, Rank and the Utility of Income, “The Economic Journal”, 118, pp. 801-821, 2008.
  • Ravallion, M., Chen, S., Measuring pro-poor growth, “Economics Letters”, 78, 93-99, 2003.
  • Rawls, J. A., A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press, 1971.
  • Rignano, E., Di un socialismo in accordo con la dottrina liberale, Bocca, 1901.
  • Robbins, L., An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. Macmillan, London 1932.
  • Robbins, L., Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility: A Comment, “The Economic Journal”, 48, 635–41, 1932.
  • Robson, A. J., Status, the distribution of wealth, private and social attitudes to risk, “Econometrica”, 60, 837–857, 1992.
  • Runciman, W. G., Relative Deprivation and Social Justice: A Study of Attitudes to Social Inequality in Twentieth-Century England, Berkeley and Los Angeles, University of California Press, 1966.
  • Sala-i-Martin, X., The World Distribution of Income: Falling Poverty and Convergence, Period, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(2), 351-397, 2006.
  • Samuelson P. A., Foundations of Economic Analysis. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1947.
  • Sen, A. K., Collective Choice and Social Welfare. Holden-Day, San Francisco, 1970.
  • Sen, A. K., On Economic Inequality. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1973.
  • Sen, A.K. (1976) Real national income, “Review of Economic Studies”, 43, 19–39.
  • Sen, A. K., On weights and measures: informational constraints in social welfare analysis, “Econometrica”, 45, 1539–1572, 1977.
  • Sen, A. K., Foster, J., On Economic Inequality. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1997.
  • Shorrocks, A. F., Ranking Income Distributions, “Economica”, 50, 3–17, 1983.
  • WIID (2007) World income inequality database version 2.0b, UNU-WIDER World Income Inequality Database, http://www.wider.unu.edu/research/Database/en_GB/database/.
  • Yitzhaki, S. (1979) Relative Deprivation and the Gini Coefficient, “Quarterly Journal of Economics”, 93, 321–32, 1979.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000168772652

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.