Towards a Service-Oriented Capability-Driven Selection of Cots Business Software

• Autorzy: Rolf Kluge , Andre Ludwig , Bogdan Franczyk , Leszek Maciaszek
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This paper provides an insight to the in-progress research on a service-oriented capability-driven approach that supports the selection of COTS business software. Service-oriented means that the concepts of service-orientation (i.e. models, methods and techniques) are adopted in the selection and that COTS business software is perceived as service provider having a set of service capabilities. Capability-driven means that the selection process is driven by matching required service capabilities of service consumer with provided capacities and abilities of COTS business software. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Business Process Management (BPM); Computer software; Business services

PL

Zarządzanie procesami biznesowymi; Oprogramowanie komputerowe; Usługi biznesowe

• Czasopismo: Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu
• Rocznik: 2009
• Numer: nr 85 Advanced Information Technologies for Management - AITM 2009
• Strony: 133--145

Twórcy

autor

Rolf Kluge

• University of Leipzig, Germany; Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia

autor

Andre Ludwig

• University of Leipzig, Germany

autor

Bogdan Franczyk

• University of Leipzig, Germany

autor

Leszek Maciaszek

• Wrocław University of Economics; Macquarie University, Sydney

Bibliografia

• Akkiraju R. et al. (2005), Web Service Semantics WSDL-S, W3C Member Submission, http://www.w3.org/SubmissionAVSDL-S/.
• Alonso G., Casati F., Kuno H. (2004), Web Services: Concepts, Architectures and Applications, Vol. 1, Springer, Berlin.
• Alves C., Castro J. (2001 ), CRG: A systematic method for COTS components selection, [in:] XV Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering (SBES'), Rio de Janeiro, pp. 193-207.
• Alves C., Finkelstein A. (2002a), Challenges in COTS decision-making: A goal-driven requirements engineering perspective, [in:] Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, ACM, Ischia, ACM, New York, pp. 789-794.
• Alves C., Finkclstcin A. (2002b), Negotiating requirements for COTS-based systems, [in:] Eighth International Workshop on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (REFSQ). Essen, pp. 1-6.
• Battle S. et al. (2005), Semantic Web Services Framework (SWSF) Overview, http://www.dainl.org/ services/swsf/1.0/overview/.
• Bonati B., Regutzki J., Schroter M. (2006), Enterprise Services Architecture for Financial Services, SAP Press, Walldorf.
• Carney D. (1999), Requirements and COTS-based systems: A thorny question indeed, The COTS Spot, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 1-7
• Carney D.J., Wallnau K.C. (1998), A basis for evaluation of commercial software, Information and Software Technology, Vol. 40, pp. 851-860.
• Dobson G., Sawyer P. (2004), Revisiting Ontology-Based Requirements Engineering in the age of the Semantic Web, http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/~dobsong/papers/dre06_ontology_based_re.pdf.
• Fensel D., Bussler C., Maedche A. (2002), Semantic web enabled web Services, [in:] Proceedings of the First International Semantic Web Conference on The Semantic Web, Springer-Verlag, London.
• Fensel D. et al. (2007), Enabling Semantic Web Services: The Web Service Modeling Ontology, Vol. 1, Springer, Berlin.
• Gonzalez-Castillo J., Trastour D., Bartolini C. (2001), Description logics for matchmaking of services, [in:] KI-2001 Workshop on Applications of Description Logics, Vienna, IIP Laboratories Bristol, HPL-2001 -265, http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2001 /HPL-2001 -265.pdf, pp. 1 -13.
• Karakostas B., Zorgios Y. (2008), Engineering Service Oriented Systems: A Model Driven Approach. Idea Group Publishing.
• Keller U. et al.(2004), WSMO Web Service Discovery WSML Working Draft (D5.1v0.1), DERI, Innsbruck.
• Kontio .1.(1995), OTSO: A Systematic Process for Reusable Software Component Selection, University of Maryland, College Park.
• Lacy L.W. (2005), OWL: Representing Information Using the Web Ontology Language, Trafford Publishing, Crewe, Cheshire.
• Lamsweerde A. v. (2001), Goal-oriented requirements engineering: A guided tour, [in:] 5th IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, Toronto, pp. 1-14.
• Leung H.K.N., Leung K.R.P.H. (2003), Domain-based COTS-product selection method, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS) 2693/2003, pp. 40-63.
• Maiden N.A.M., Ncube C. (1998), Acquiring COTS software selection requirements, Software, IEEE, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 46-56.
• Martin D. et al., OWL-S: Semantic Markup for Web Services, W3C Member Submission, http://www. w3.org/Submission/OWL-S/.
• Mayank V., Kositsyna N., Austin M.A. (2004), Requirements Engineering and the Semantic Web: Part II. Representation, Management and Validation of Requirements and System-Level Architectures, University of Maryland, College Park.
• Mielnik J.-C. et al. (2003), eCots Platform: An inter-industrial initiative for COTS-related information sharing, [in:] Second International Conference on COTS-Based Software Systems, Springer- Verlag.
• Ncube C., Maiden N.A.M. (1999), PORE: Procurement-oriented requirements engineering method for the component-based systems engineering development paradigm, [in:] International Workshop on Component-Based Software Engineering, Los Angeles, pp. 1-12.
• North American Product Classification System (2009), http://www.census.gov/eos/www/napcs/napcs. htm (access date: 01-07-2009).
• Oberndorf T., Brownsword L., Sledge C.A. (2000), An Activity Framework for COTS-Based Systems, Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh.
• Papazoglou M.P., Georgakopoulos D. (2003), Service-oriented computing introduction, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 46, No. 10, pp. 24-28.
• Papazoglou M.P., Heuvcl W.-J. (2007), Service oriented architectures: Approaches, technologies and research issues, The VLDB Journal, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 389-415.
• Pathak J. et al.(2005), A framework for semantic web services discovery, [in:] Proceedings of the 7th annual ACM International Workshop on Web Information and Data Management, ACM, Bremen, pp. 45-50.
• Ramesh B., Jarkc M. (2001), Toward reference models for requirements traceability, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 58-93.
• Roman D„ Lausen H., Keller U. (2006), Web Service Modeling Ontology - WSMO Final Draft (D2vl.3), DERI, Innsbruck.
• The Open Group SOA Working Group (2007), Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) - Whitepaper, San Francisco, CA.