Baldwin's "Domino Theory" of Regionalism - its Sources and Implications for East Asian States

• Autorzy: Sebastian Bobowski

Warianty tytułu

"Teoria domina" regionalizmu Baldwina - jej źródła i implikacje dla państw regionu Azji Wschodniej

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The second wave of regionalism expanded rapidly within the East Asian region in the late 90s, resulting in the proliferation of free trade agreements. A specific chain reaction of concluding more and more, especially bilateral agreements was identified by Richard E. Baldwin as the political "domino effect" that marginalized de facto economic issues and determinants of trade co-operation.(original abstract)

Druga fala regionalizmu zapoczątkowana została w regionie Azji Wschodniej pod koniec lat 90., implikując przyrost puli nowych porozumień o wolnym handlu. Specyficzna reakcja łańcuchowa sprowadzająca się do zawierania coraz to nowych, w szczególności bilateralnych umów określona została przez Richarda E. Baldwina mianem politycznego "efektu domina", marginalizującego de facto aspekty i determinanty ekonomiczne współpracy handlowej.(abstrakt oryginalny)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Regionalism; Trade; Trade relations

PL

Regionalizm; Handel; Stosunki handlowe

• Czasopismo: Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu
• Rocznik: 2011
• Numer: nr 191 Faces of Competitiveness in Asia Pacific
• Strony: 29--40

Twórcy

autor

Sebastian Bobowski

• Wrocław University of Economics, Poland

Bibliografia

• Anas T., Indonesia in World Bank Preferential Rules of Origin: Policy Research Report, World Bank, Washington 2007.
• Ando M., Impacts of Japanese FTAs/EPAs: Post Evaluation from the Initial Data, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry, Tokyo June 2007.
• ASEAN Competitiveness Study, McKinsey and Company, ASEAN Secretariat, Jakarta 2003.
• Baldwin R.E., A Domino Theory of Regionalism, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 4465, September 1993.
• Bobowski S., Efekt spaghetti - przejaw czy zagrożenie procesów integracyjnych w regionie Azji i Pacyfiku?, [in:] B. Drelich-Skulska (ed.), Studia azjatyckie, Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu Nr 28, Ekonomia i Międzynarodowe Stosunki Gospodarcze Nr 19, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, Wrocław 2008.
• Estevadeordal A., Harris J., Suominen K., Multilateralizing Preferential Rules of Origin around the World, WTO/HEI/NCCR, Geneva, 10-12 September 2007.
• Francis S., Kallummal M., The New Regionalism in Southeast Asian Trade Policy and Issues in Market Access and Industrial Development: An Analysis of the ASEAN-China Free Trade Agreement, The IDEAs Working Paper Series, No. 6/2008.
• Hertel T., How Confident Can We Be in CGE-Based Assessments of Free Trade Agreements?, National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Paper 10477, May 2004.
• Kimura F., Bilateralism in the Asia-Pacific: An economic review, [in:] Bilateral Trade Agreements in the Asia-Pacific: Origins, Evolution and Implications, Routledge, London 2006.
• Munakata N., Transforming East Asia: The Evolution of Regional Economic Integration, Brookings Institution Press, Washington 2006.
• Park S.-H., Koo M.G., Forming a cross-regional partnership: The South Korea-Chile FTA and its implications, Pacific Affairs 2007, No. 80.
• Plummer M.G., Toward Win-Win Regionalism in Asia: Issues and Challenges in Forming Efficient Trade Agreements, ADB Working Group Series on Regional Economic Integration No. 5, October 2006.
• Ravenhill J., The new bilateralism in the Asia-Pacific, Third World Quarterly 2003, Vol. 24.
• Ravenhill J., The move to preferential trade on the Western Pacific Rim: Some initial conclusions, Australian Journal of International Affairs 2008, Vol. 62.
• Ravenhill J., The New East Asian Regionalism: A Political Domino Effect?, UNU-CRID Working Papers, United Nations University, Brugge, November 2009.
• Schiff M.W., Winters L.A., Regional Integration and Development, Oxford University Press for the World Bank, New York 2003.
• Scollay R., Gilbert J., New Regional Trading Arrangements in the Asia Pacific?, Institute for International Economics, Washington, D.C., 2001.
• Taylor L., Amim R.V., Modelling the Impact of Trade Liberalisation: A Critique of Computable Ge-neral Equilibrium Models, Oxfam Publishing, Oxfam Research Report, Oxford 1 June 2007.