Innovations in Management Accounting at the Turn of the 20th and 21st Century

• Autorzy: Tomasz Wnuk-Pel
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Diffusion of innovative management accounting methods constitutes an incredibly interesting and a widely presented subject in literature all over the world. In the context of significance of innovative management accounting methods diffusion, the following objective of the article has been formulated - the article aims to analyze the concept of innovations in management accounting and analyze their significance and diffusion at the turn of the 20th and 21st century. In order to reach the aim, an analysis of the concept of management accounting innovations has been attempted; attention has been paid to the fact that the innovations are delayed when compared to technical innovations, the results of the delay have also been presented. Analysis of findings of the research on the use of innovative methods such as ABC/M, BSC, TQM and analysis of methods of company and individual employees' performance evaluation has been made. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Total Quality Management (TQM); Management accounting; Activity Based Costing (ABC); Innovations in management

PL

Zarządzanie przez jakość; Rachunkowość zarządcza; Rachunek kosztów działań; Innowacje w zarządzaniu

• Czasopismo: Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica
• Rocznik: 2011
• Tom: 257 Current Trends in Management, Finance and Accounting Sciences. Vol. 1
• Strony: 133--145

Twórcy

autor

Tomasz Wnuk-Pel

• University of Lodz, Poland

Bibliografia

• Abrahamson E. (1991), Managerial fads and fashions: the diffusion and rejections of innovations, "Academy of Management Review", No. 16 (3), p. 586-612.
• Baird K. (2007), Adoption of activity management practices in public sector organizations, "Accounting & Finance", No. 47 (4), p. 551-569.
• Banker R. D., Potter G., Srinivasan D. (2000), An empirical investigation of an incentive plan that includes nonfinancial performance measures, "The Accounting Review", No. 75 (1), p. 65-92.
• Bjornenak T., Olson O. (1999), Unbundling management accounting innovations. "Management Accounting Research", No. 10, p. 325-338.
• Bouwens J., van Lent L. (2006), Performance measure properties and the effect of incentive contracts, "Journal of Management Accounting Research", No. 18 (1), p. 21-54.
• Bromwich M., Bhimani A. (1994), Management accounting: pathways to progress, London: Chartered Institute of Management Accountants.
• Brown D. A., Booth P., Giacobbe F. (2004), Technological and organizational influences on the adoption of activity-based costing in Australia, "Accounting and Finance", No. 44, p. 329-356.
• Burney L., Widener S. (2007), Strategic performance measurement systems, job-relevant information, and managerial behavioral responses - role stress and performance, "Behavioral Research in Accounting", No. 19, p. 1-21.
• Chenhall R. (2008), Accounting for the horizontal organization: a review essay, "Accounting, Organizations and Society", No. 33, p. 517-550.
• Chenhall R., Langfield-Smith K. (1998), Adoption and benefits of management accounting practices: an Australian study, "Management Accounting Research", No. 9 (1), p. 1-19.
• Cinquini L., Collini P., Marelli A., Tenucci A. (2008), An exploration of the factors affecting the diffusion of advanced costing techniques: a comparative analysis of two surveys (1996- 2005), Paper presented at the European Accounting Association Conference, Rotterdam.
• Clarke P. J., Hill N. T., Stevens K. (1999), Activity-based costing in Ireland: barriers to, and opportunities for, change, "Critical Perspectives in Accounting", No. 10, p. 443-468.
• Damanpour F., Evan W. M. (1984), Organizational innovation and performance: the problem of 'Organizational Lag', "Administrative Science Quarterly", No. 29 (3), p. 1-19.
• Datar S., Kulp S. C, Lambert R. A. (2001), Balancing performance measures, "Journal of Accounting Research", No. 39 (1), p. 75-92.
• Davis S., Albright T. (2004), An investigation of the effect of balanced scorecard implementation on financial performance, "Management Accounting Research", No. 15, p. 135-153.
• Dunk A. S. (2002), Product quality, environmental accounting and quality performance, "Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal", No. 15 (5), p. 719-732.
• Evan W. M. (1966), Organizational lag, "Human Organizations", No. 25 (1), p. 1-20.
• Gurd B., Smith M., Swaffer A. (2002), Factors impacting on accounting lag: an exploratory study of responding to TQM, "British Accounting Review", No. 34 (3), p. 205-221.
• Hoque Z., Alam M. (1999), TQM adoption, institutionalism and changes in management accounting systems: a case study, "Accounting and Business Research", No. 29 (3), p. 199-210.
• Hoque Z., James W. (2000), Linking balanced scorecard measures to size and market factors: impact on organizational performance, "Journal of Management Accounting Research", No. 12, p. 1-17.
• Hoque Z., Zawawi N. H. M. (2009), Research in management accounting innovations: an overview of its recent development, Paper presented at the European Accounting Association Conference, Tampere.
• Ittner C. D., Lanen W. N., Larcker D. F. (2002), The association between activity-based costing and manufacturing performance, "Journal of Accounting Research", No. 40, p. 711-726.
• Johnson H. T. (1992), Relevance Regained, New York: Free Press.
• Joseph G. (2008), A rationale for stakeholder-based management in developing nations, "Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change", No. 4 (2), p. 136-161.
• Kaplan R. S. (1984), The role of empirical research in management accounting, "Accounting, Organization and Society", No. 11 (415), p. 429-452.
• Kaplan R. S. (1986), The evolution of management accounting, "The Accounting Review", No. 7, p. 390-418.
• Kaplan R. S. (1994a), Flexible budgeting in activity based costing framework, "Accounting Horizons", No. 6, p. 104-109.
• Kaplan R. S. (1994b), Management accounting (1984-1994): development of new practice and theory, "Management Accounting Research", No. 5 (3-4), p. 247-260.
• Krumwiede K. R. (1998), The implementation stages of activity-based costing and the impact of contextual and organizational factors, "Journal of Management Accounting Research", No. 10, p. 239-277.
• Maiga A. S., Jacobs F.A. (2005), Antecedents and consequences of quality performance, "Behavioral Research in Accounting", No. 17, p. 1-17.
• Malmi T. (1999), Activity-based costing diffusion across organizations: an exploratory empirical analysis of Finnish firms, "Accounting, Organizations and Society", No. 24 (8), p. 649-672.
• McGowan A. S., Klammer T. P. (1997), Satisfaction with activity-based costing cost management implementation, "Management Accounting Research", No. 9, p. 217-237.
• Merchant K. A. (2006), Measuring general managers' performances: market, accounting and combination-of-measures systems, "Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal", No. 19 (6), p. 893-917.
• Rogers E. (2003), Diffusion of Innovation, 5lh edition, New York: Free Press.
• Rogers E. M., Shoemaker F. F. (1971), Communications of innovations: a cross-cultural approach, 2nd edition, New York: Free Press.
• Shields M. D. (1995), An empirical analysis of firms' implementation experiences with activity- -based costing, "Journal of Management Accounting Research", No. 7, p. 148-166.
• Staubus G. J. (1971), The dark ages of cost accounting, Boston: Irwin.
• Tuomela T. (2005), The interplay of different levers of control: a case study of introducing a new performance measurement system, "Management Accounting Research", No. 16 (3), p. 269-292.
• Ullrich M. J., Tuttle B. M. (2004), The effects of comprehensive information reporting systems and economic incentives on managers' time-planning decisions, "Behavioral Research in Accounting", No. 16, p. 1-17.
• Verbeteen F. H. M. (2007), Performance management practices in public sector organizations: impact on performance, "Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal", No. 21 (3), p. 427-454.
• Webb R. A. (2004), Managers' commitment to the goals contained in a strategic performance measurement system, "Contemporary Accounting Research", No. 21 (4), p. 3-23.

Identyfikatory

DOI

11089/738