Pomiar efektów współpracy nauki i przemysłu

• Autorzy: Anna Kwiotkowska

Warianty tytułu

Measuring Outcomes of Cooperation between Science and Industry

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

W dobie postępującej globalizacji i nasilającej się konkurencji międzynarodowej sprawne powiązania ze sferą naukowo-badawczą warunkują innowacyjność i konkurencyjność przedsiębiorstw. Dla rozwoju systemów innowacyjnych, zapewnienia stałego i szerokiego dostępu do źródeł wiedzy oraz ciągłego rozszerzenia zakresu współpracy istotna jest systematyczna ocena i bieżący monitoring wspólnie podejmowanych inicjatyw. Celem artykułu jest przedstawienie koncepcji pomiaru współpracy pomiędzy uczelnią wyższą a przemysłem opartej na modelu tzw. mapy sukcesu. (abstrakt oryginalny)

EN

The article was formulated within the framework of a research project No. N N115 257434 entitled The conditions of enterprise innovativeness in an industry region - on the basis of the example of the Silesian Voivodeship. An increasing significance of the collaboration between the spheres of science and industry implies the development of innovativeness in enterprises by means of extended access to R&D resources on the one hand, and a growing openness of universities in search of additional financial sources on the other hand. What is more, the collaboration between science and industry facilitates as well as accelerates the introduction of innovations to the market what contributes to the increase in competitive advantage of business. While firms increasingly engage in formal alliances with universities, there is a lack of tools to assess the outcomes of such collaborations. In the paper a performance measurement system for university-industry collaborations was proposed on the basis of a model by M. Perkmann, A. Neely, and K. Walsh. The conception based on success map from existing research on university-industry relations, indicating the causal relationships underpinning successful alliances. The success map distinguishes between different process stages, including inputs, in-process activities, outputs and impacts. In the paper was discussed specific measures for each of these stages, and how they should be deployed. It provides R&D managers with a tool for assessing university-industry alliances that is prospective, reliable and multidimensional. Based on author's deliberations an attempt to verify the introduced concept will be undertaken. It will take place by means of in-depth research carried out in an economic practice. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Współpraca; Nauka; Przemysł; Innowacyjność; Badania i rozwój (B+R)

EN

Cooperation; Science; Industry; Innovative character; Research & Development (R+D)

• Czasopismo: Współczesne Zarządzanie
• Rocznik: 2010
• Numer: nr 4
• Strony: 45--54

Twórcy

autor

Anna Kwiotkowska

• Politechnika Śląska

Bibliografia

• 1. Adams R., Bessant J., Phelps R., (2006), Innovation Management Measurement: A Review, "International Journal of Management Reviews", No. 8.
• 2. Aghion P., Dewatripont M., Stein J.C., (2008), Academic Freedom, Private-Sector Focus and the Process of Innovation, "The Journal of Economics", No. 39.
• 3. Arundel A., (2001), The Relative Effectiveness of Patents and Secrecy for Appropriation, "Research Policy", No. 30.
• 4. Bercovitz J.E., Feldman M.P., (2007), Fishing Upstream: Firm Innovation Strategy and University Research Alliances, "Research Policy", No. 36.
• 5. Bercovitz J.E., Feldman M.P., (2008), Academic Entrepreneurs: Organizational Change at the Individual Level, "Organization Science", No. 19.
• 6. Bremser W.G., Barsky N.P., (2004), Utilizing the Balanced Scorecard for R&D Performance Measurement, "R&D Management", No. 34.
• 7. Brown M.G., Sevenson R.A., (1998), Measuring R&D Productivity, "Research Technology Management", No. 31.
• 8. Cohen W.M., Nelson R.R., Walsh J.P., (2002), Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial, "R&D, Management Science", No. 48.
• 9. Cukor P., (1992), How GTE Laboratories Evaluates Its University Collaborations, Research Technology Management, No. 35.
• 10. Cyert R.M., Goodman P.S., (1997), Creating Effective University - Industry Alliances: An Organizational Learning Perspective, "Organizational Dynamics", No. 25.
• 11. D'Este P., Salter A., Bruneel J., Neely A., (2008), The Search for Talent and Technology, AIM Academic Publication, Advanced Institute of Management Research, London.
• 12. Dorst K., Cross N., (2001), Creativity in the Design Process: Co-evolution of Problem - Solution, "Design Studies", No. 22.
• 13. Etzkowitz H., Klofsten M., (2005), The Innovating Region: Toward a Theory of Knowledge-based Regional Development, "R&D Management", No. 35 (3).
• 14. Feller I., (2005), A Historical Perspective on Government - University Partnerships to Enhance Entrepreneurship and Economic Development, [w:] S. Shane, Economic Development through Entrepreneurship: Government, University and Business Linkages, E. Elgar, Cheltenham.
• 15. Feller I., Ailes C.P., Roessner J.D., (2002), Impacts of Research Universities on Technological Innovation in Industry: Evidence from Engineering Research Centers, "Research Policy", No. 31.
• 16. George G., Zahra S.A., Wood D.R., (2002), The Effects of Business - University Alliances on Innovative Output and Financial Performance: A Study of Publicly Traded Biotechnology Companies, "Journal of Business Venturing", No. 17 (6).
• 17. Grimaldi R., Tunzelmann N., (2002), Assessing Collaborative, Pre-Competitive R&D Project: The Case of the UK LINK Scheme, "R&D Management", No. 32.
• 18. Hammert M., Bstieler L., (2010), Cultivating Successful University - Industry Research Collaboration: A Study of Korean Partnership, American Academy of Management Annual Meeting.
• 19. Hicks D., (1995), Published Papers, Tacit Competencies and Corporate Management of the Public/Private Character of Knowledge, "Industrial & Corporate Change", No. 4.
• 20. Kerssens-van Drongelen I., Bilderbeek J., (1999), R&D Performance Measurement: More than Choosing a Set of Metrics, "R&D Management", No. 29.
• 21. Kostoff R.N., Geisler E., (2007), The Unintended Consequences of Metrics in Technology Evaluation, "Journal of Informetrics", No. 1.
• 22. Lander L., Matheson D., Manke M., Ransley L., (1995), Improving the R&D Decision Process, "Research Technology Management", No. 38.
• 23. Leydesdorff L., Meyer M., (2006), Triple Helix Indicators of Knowledge - Based Innovation System, "Research Policy", No. 35 (10).
• 24. Louis K.S., Blumanthal D., Gluck M., Stoto M.A., (1989), Entrepreneurs in Academe: An Exploration of Behaviors among Life Scientists, "Administrative Science Quarterly", No. 34.
• 25. March J.G., (1991), Exportation and Exploitation in Organizational Learning, "Organization Science", No. 2.
• 26. Mora V., Montoro S., Guerras M., (2004), Determining Factors in the Success of R&D Cooperative Agreements between Firms and Research Organizations, "Research Policy", No. 33.
• 27. Murray F., (2002), Innovation as Co-evolution of Scientific and Technological Networks: Exploring Tissue Engineering, "Research Policy", No. 31.
• 28. Murray F., O'Mahony S., (2007), Reconceptualizing the Institutional Foundations of Cumulative Innovation, "Organization Science", No. 18.
• 29. Neely A.D., Gregory M., Platts K., (1995), Performance Measurement System Design: A Literature Review and Research Agenda, "International Journal of Operations & Production Management", No. 15.
• 30. O'Shea R.P., Allen T.J., Morse K.P., O'Gorman C., Roche F., (2007), Delineating the Anatomy of an Entrepreneurial University: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Experience, "R&D Management", No. 37.
• 31. Perkmann M., Neely A., Walsh K., (2010), How Should Firms Evaluate Success in University-Industry Alliances? A Performance Measurement System, "AIM Research Working Paper Series", No. 8.
• 32. Perkamnn M., Walsh K., (2007), University - Industry Relationships and Open Innovation: Towards a Research Agenda, "International Journal of Management Reviews", No. 9.
• 33. Perkmann M., Walsh K., (2009), The Two Faces of Collaboration: Impacts of University - Industry Relations On Public Research, "Industrial and Corporate Change", No. 18.
• 34. Plewa C., Quester P., (2006), Satisfaction with University - Industry Relationships: the Impact of Commitment, Trust and Championship, "International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialization", No. 5.
• 35. Saez C.B., Marco T.G., Arribas E.H., (2002), Collaboration in R&D with Universities and Research Centres: An Empirical Study of Spanish Firms, "R&D Management", No. 32.
• 36. Satler A.J., Martin B.R., (2001), The Economic Benefits of Publicly Funded Basic Research: A Critical Review, "Research Policy", No. 30.
• 37. Shinn T., Lamy E., (2006), Paths of Commercial Knowledge: Forms and Consequences of University - Enterprise Synergy in Scientist - Sponsored Firms, "Research Policy", No. 35.
• 38. Voytek K.P., Lellock K.L., Schmit M.A., (2004), Developing Performance Metrics for Science and Technology Programs: The Case of the Manufacturing Extension Partnership Program, "Economic Development Quarterly", No. 18.
• 39. Webster A., Swain V., (1991), The Pharmaceutical Industry: Towards a New Innovation Environment, "Technology Analysis & Strategic Management", No. 3.
• 40. Zucker L.G., Darby M.R., Brewer M.B., (1998), Intellectual Human Capital and the Birth of US Biotechnology Enterprises, "American Economic Review", No. 88.