Interwencjonizm a liberalizm - między paradygmatem keynesowskim i neoklasycznym

• Autorzy: Izabela Bludnik

Warianty tytułu

Interventionism and Liberalism - between Keynesian and Neoclassical Paradigms

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

Neokeynesowski program badawczy jest niezwykle heterogeniczny. Wynika to przede wszystkim z ogromnego zróżnicowania zainteresowań badawczych, charakterystycznych dla całego paradygmatu keynesowskiego, jak i z licznych wpływów nurtu neoliberalnego. Wiele współczesnych teorii keynesowskich akceptuje wprost takie tradycyjnie klasyczne elementy, jak: dobrowolne bezrobocie, doskonała konkurencja, homogeniczne optymalizujące podmioty gospodarcze, długookresowa równowaga z neutralnym pieniądzem i zrealizowanymi oczekiwaniami, podażowa polityka gospodarcza. Stąd wniosek, że neokeynesizm powinien być postrzegany jako szkoła leżąca na pograniczu dwóch paradygmatów - keynesowskiego i neoklasycznego. To przenikanie się obydwu paradygmatów, którego wyrazem są "hybrydowe" modele neokeynesowskie, nie oznacza jednak, że udało się osiągnąć trwałe porozumienie między opozycyjnymi szkołami głównego nurtu, dowodzące faktycznego postępu naukowego. (abstrakt oryginalny)

EN

The New Keynesian research program is unusually heterogeneous. This results mainly from different scientific interests typical of the Keynesian paradigm and distinct neoliberal influences. Many modern Keynesian theories utterly accept such traditionally classical elements as: voluntary unemployment, perfect competition, homogeneous optimizing agents, long-term equilibrium with neutral money and realized expectations, supply-side economic policy. Hence, New Keynesian Economics should be viewed as a school being on the edge of the two paradigms - Keynesian and neoclassical. The amalgamate of the two paradigms manifested by "hybrid" New Keynesian models does not mean, however, that long-standing conflicts between mainstream schools have been ultimately averted. Also it does not mean that the actual scientific progress has been accomplished. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Interwencjonizm państwa; Liberalizm; Neokeynesizm; Keynesizm

EN

Government intervention; Liberalism; Neokeynesian; Keynesian theory

• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe / Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu
• Rocznik: 2012
• Numer: nr 230
• Strony: 42--56

Twórcy

autor

Izabela Bludnik

• Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu

Bibliografia

• Akerlof, G.A., 1982, Labor Contracts as Partial Gift Exchange, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 97, no. 4.
• Akerlof, G. A., Shiller, R.J., 2009, Animal Spirits. How Human Psychology Drives the Economy, and Why It Matters for Global Capitalism, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
• Akerlof, G.A., Yellen, J.L., 1985, A Near-rational Model of the Business Cycle, with Wage and Price Inertia, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 100, no. 4, Supplement.
• Alchian, A.A., 1970, Information Costs, Pricing and Resource Unemployment, w: Phelps, E.S. i in. (eds.), Employment and Inflation Theory, W.W. Norton & Company Inc., New York.
• Alexopoulos, M., 2007, A Monetary Business Cycle Model with Unemployment, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, vol. 31, no. 12.
• Azariadis, C., 1975, Implicit Contracts and Underemployment Equilibria, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 83, no. 6.
• Baily, M.N., 1974, Wages and Employment under Uncertain Demand, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 41, no. 125.
• Benassi, C., Chirco, A., Colombo, C., 1994, The New Keynesian Economics, Blackwell, Oxford.
• Bryant, J., 1983, A Simple Rational Expectations Keynes-type Model, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 98, no. 3.
• Calvo, G.A., 1983, Staggered Prices in a Utility-Maximizing Framework, Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 12, no. 3.
• Danthine, P., Kurmann, A., 2004, Fair Wages in a New Keynesian Model of the Business Cycle, Review of Economic Dynamics, vol. 7, no. 1.
• Davidson, P., 1982/1983, Rational Expectations: A Fallacious Foundation for Studying Crucial Decision-making Processes, Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics, vol. 5, no. 2.
• Davidson, P., 1987, Sensible Expectations and the Long-run Non-neutrality of Money, Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics, vol. 10, no. 1.
• Davidson, P., 1988, A Technical Definition of Uncertainty and the Long-run Non-neutrality of Money, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 12, no. 3.
• De Grauwe, P., 2008, DSGE-Modelling When Agents Are Imperfectly Informed, Working Paper Series, no. 879/May, European Central Bank.
• Diamond, P.A., 1982, Aggregate Demand Management in Search Equilibrium, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 90, no. 5.
• Fischer, S., 1977, Long-term Contracts, Rational Expectations, and the Optimal Money Supply Rule, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 85, no. 1.
• Friedman, M., 1968, The Role of Monetary Policy, American Economic Review, vol. 58, no. 1.
• Friedman, M., 1977, Nobel Lecture: Inflation and Unemployment, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 85, no. 3.
• Gali, J., 2009, The New Keynesian Approach to Monetary Policy Analysis: Lessons and New Directions [online] http://www.crei.cat/people/gali/jg09cfs.pdf [dostep: 5.09.2012].
• Gerrard, B., 1995, Keynes, the Keynesians and the Classics: A Suggested Interpretation, Economic Journal, vol. 105, no. 429.
• Goodfriend, M., King, R.G., 1997, The New Neoclassical Synthesis and the Role of Monetary Policy, w: Bernanke, B., Rotemberg, J. (eds.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual, MIT Press, Cambridge.
• Gordon, D.F., 1974, A Neo-classical Theory of Keynesian Unemployment, Economic Inquiry, vol. 12, no. 4.
• Gordon, R.J., 1981, Output Fluctuations and Gradual Price Adjustment, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 19, no. 2.
• Gordon, R.J., 1990, What Is New-Keynesian Economics?, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 28, no. 3.
• Greenwald, B., Stiglitz, J., 1993, New and Old Keynesians, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 7, no. 1.
• Hart, O., 1982, A Model of Imperfect Competition with Keynesian Features, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 97, no. 1.
• Holt, C.C., 1970a, How Can the Phillips Curve Be Moved to Reduce Both Inflation and Unemployment?, w: Phelps, E.S. i in. (eds.), Employment and Inflation Theory, W.W. Norton & Company Inc., New York.
• Holt, C.C., 1970b, Job Search, Phillips' Wage Relation, and Union Influence: Theory and Evidence, w: Phelps, E.S. i in. (eds.), Employment and Inflation Theory, W.W. Norton & Company Inc., New York.
• Kiyotaki, N., 1988, Multiple Expectational Equilibria under Monopolistic Competition, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 103, no. 4.
• Layard, R., 1986, How to Beat Unemployment, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
• Layard, R., Nickell, S., Jackman, R., 1991, Unemployment. Macroeconomic Performance and the Labour Market, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
• Mankiw, N.G., 1985, Small Menu Costs and Large Business Cycles: A Macroeconomic Model of Monopoly, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 100, no. 2.
• Mankiw, N.G., 2006, The Macroeconomist as Scientist and Engineer, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 20, no. 4.
• Mortensen, D.T., 1970, Job Search, the Duration of Unemployment, and the Phillips Curve, American Economic Review, vol. 60, no. 5.
• Muth, J.F., 1961, Rational Expectations and the Theory of Price Movements, Econometrica, vol. 29, no. 3.
• Negishi, T., 1979, Microeconomic Foundations of Keynesian Macroeconomics, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.
• Okun, A.M., 1981, Prices and Quantities: A Macroeconomic Analysis, Blackwell, Oxford.
• Okun, A.M., 1991, Ceny i ilości. Analiza makroekonomiczna, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 1991.
• Orphanides, A., Williams, J.C., 2007, Robust Monetary Policy with Imperfect Knowledge, Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 54, no. 5.
• Phelps, E.S., 1970, Money Wage Dynamics and Labor Market Equilibrium, w: Phelps, E.S. i in. (eds.), Employment and Inflation Theory, W.W. Norton & Company Inc., New York,
• Phelps, E.S., Taylor, J.B., 1977, Stabilizing Powers of Monetary Policy under Rational Expectations, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 85, no. 1.
• Rotemberg, J.J., 1987, The New Keynesian Microfoundations, w: Fischer, S. (ed.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual, MIT Press, Cambridge.
• Shapiro, C., Stiglitz, J.E., 1984, Equilibrium Unemployment as a Worker Discipline Device, American Economic Review, vol. 74, no. 3.
• Snowdon, B., Vane, H., 1997, New-Keynesian Economics Today. The Empire Strikes Back, w: Snowdon, B., Vane, H.R. (eds.), A Macroeconomics Reader, Routledge, New York.
• Stiglitz, J.E., 1987, The Causes and Consequences of the Dependence of Quality on Price, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 25, no. 1.
• Stiglitz, J.E., Weiss, A., 1992, Asymmetric Information in Credit Markets and It s Implications for Macro-economics, Oxford Economic Papers, vol. 44, no. 4.
• Taylor, B., 1980, Aggregate Dynamics and Staggered Contracts, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 88, no. 1.
• Tobin, J., 1980, Are New Classical Models Plausible Enough to Guide Policy?, Cowles Foundation Papers, no. 518.
• Tobin, J., 1981, The Monetarist Counter-Revolution Today - An Appraisal, Cowles Foundation Paper, no. 532.
• Weitzman, M., 1982, Increasing Returns and the Foundations of Unemployment Theory, Economic Journal, vol. 92, no. 368.
• Woodford, M., 2009, Convergence in Macroeconomics: Elements of the New Synthesis, American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, vol. 1, no. 1.