Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2013 | 13 | nr 1 | 26--47
Tytuł artykułu

Constructing entrepreneurial orientation in a selling context : the qualitative attitude approach

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
This paper explores the construction of attitudes in argumentative talk to underscore the context-specific nature of the dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation (EO) and their interrelations. The material comprises interviews in which the directors, who form the management group of a Finnish firm, individually commented on a statement that each sales-person is an autonomous entrepreneur'. Our analysis identified two opposing evaluations of entrepreneurial autonomy, which were labeled as proactive selling and internal competitive aggressiveness. The analysis points out limitations on the realistic and positivist premises of the conventional EO measures by identifying related yet differing understandings which actors involved in everyday organizational practices display in their talk. (original abstract)
Opis fizyczny
  • University of Helsinki, Finland
  • University of Helsinki, Finland
  • Anderson, A., Starnawska, M., 2008, Research Practices in Entrepreneurship: Problems of Definition, Description and Meaning, The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, vol. 9(4), pp. 221-230.
  • Asch, S.E., 1940, Studies in the Principles of Judgments and Attitudes: II. Determination of Judgments by Group and by Ego Standards, Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 12(2), pp. 433-465.
  • Augoustinos, M., Walker, I., 1995, Social Cognition: An Integrated Introduction,London, Sage.
  • Basso, O., Fayolle, A., Bouchard, V., 2009, Entrepreneurial Orientation: The Making of a Concept, The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, vol. 10(4), pp. 313-321.
  • Billig, M., 1991, Ideology and Opinions: Studies in Rhetorical Psychology, London, Sage.
  • Billig, M., 1996, Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical View of Social Psychology, 2nd ed., Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Billig, M., 2009, Discursive Psychology, Rhetoric and the Issue of Agency, Semen, vol. 27, available at: [access: 27.10.2012].
  • Conrad, C, Malphurs, R, 2008,Are We There Yet? Are We There Yet? Management Communication Quarterly, vol. 22(1), pp. 123-146.
  • Covin, J.G., Lumpkin, G.T., 201 1, Entrepreneurial Orientation Theory and Research: Reflections on a Needed Construct, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 35(5), pp. 855-872.
  • Covin, J.G., Slevin, D.P, 1989, Strategic Management of Small Firms in Hostile and Benign Environments, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 10(1), pp. 75-87.
  • Covin, J.G., Slevin, D.P, 1991, A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship as Firm Behavior, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 16(1), pp. 7-25.
  • Covin, J.G., Wales, W.J., 2012, The Measurement of Entrepreneurial Orientation, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 36(4), pp. 677-702.
  • Dess, G.G., Lumpkin, G.T., Covin, J.G., 1997, Entrepreneurial Strategy Making and Firm Performance: Tests of Contingency and Configurational Models, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 18(9), pp. 677-695.
  • Eagly, A.H., Chaiken, S., 1993, The Psychology of Attitudes, Orlando, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
  • Engstrom, G.L., 2010, Rhetorical Criticism as a Method for Examining Cultural Pressures on Organizational Form, Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, vol. 5(3), pp. 259-279.
  • Gawel, A., 2012, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability: Do They Have Anything in Common?, Poznan University of Economics Review, vol. 12(1), pp. 5-16.
  • Grant, P., Perren, L., 2002, Small Business and Entrepreneurial Research: Meta-Theories, Paradigms and Prejudices, International Small Business Journal, vol. 20(2), pp. 185-2 1 1.
  • Green, S.E. Jr, 2004, A Rhetorical Theory of Diffusion, Academy of Management Review, vol. 29(4), pp. 653-669.
  • Green, S.E. Jr, Babb, M., Alpaslan, CM., 2008, Institutional Field Dynamics and the Competition between Institutional Logics: The Role of Rhetoric in the Evolving Control of the Modern Corporation, Management Communication Quarterly, vol. 22( 1), pp. 40-73.
  • Holt, R., Macpherson, A., 2010, Sensemaking Rhetoric and the Socially Competent Entrepreneur, International Small Business Journal, vol. 28(1), pp. 20-42.
  • Kauppinen, T., Vainio, A., Valros, A., Rita, H., Vesala K.M., 2010, Improving Animal Welfare: Qualitative and Quantitative Methodology in the Study of Farmers' Attitudes, Animal Welfare, vol. 19(4), pp. 523-536.
  • Lähdesmäki, M., Siltaoja, M., 2010, Towards a Variety of Meanings - Multiple Representations of Reputation in the Small Business Context, British Journal of Management, vol. 21(1), pp. 207-222.
  • Lalljee,M., Brown, L.B., Ginsburg, G.R, 1984, Attitudes: Disposition, Behavior or Evaluation?, British Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 23(3), pp. 233-244.
  • Lechner, C, Gudmundsson, S.V., 2012, Entrepreneurial Orientation, Firm Strategy and Small firm performance, International Small Business Journal, Epub Ahead of Print, 10 September, DOI: 10.11777/0266242612455034.
  • Lindgren, M., Packendorff, J., 2009, Social Constructionism and Entrepreneurship: Basic Assumptions and Consequences for Theory and Research, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, vol. 15(1), pp. 25-47.
  • Lumpkin, G.T., Cogliser, C.C., Schneider, D.R., 2009, Understanding and Measuring Autonomy: An Entrepreneurial Orientation Perspective, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 33(1), pp. 47-69.
  • Lumpkin, G.T., Dess, G.G., 1996, Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking it to Performance, Academy of Management Review, vol. 21(1), pp. 135-172.
  • Lumpkin, G.T., Dess, G.G., 2001, Linking Two Dimensions of Entrepreneurial Orientation to Firm Performance: Moderating Role of Environment and Industry Life Cycle, Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 16(5), pp. 429-451.
  • Lyon, D.W., Lumpkin, G.T., Dess, G.G., 2000, Enhancing Entrepreneurial Orientation Research: Operationalizing and Measuring a Key Strategic Decision Making Process, Journal of Management, vol. 26(5), pp. 1055-1085.
  • McGuire, W, 1985, Attitudes and Attitude Change, in: Lindzey, G., Aronson, E. (eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology. Special Fields and Applications, 2nd ed., New York, Random House.
  • Miller, D., 1983, The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms, Management Science, vol. 27(7), pp. 770-791.
  • Miller, D., 201 1, Miller (1983) Revisited: A Reflection on EO Research and Some Suggestions for the Future, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 35(5), pp. 873-894.
  • Nousiainen, M., Pylkkänen, P., Saunders, E, Seppänen, L., Vesala, K.M., 2009, Are Alternative Food Systems Socially Sustainable? A Case Study from Finland, Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, vol. 33(5), pp. 566-594.
  • Peräkylä, A., 2004, Reliability and Validity in Research Based on Naturally Occurring Social Interaction, in: Silverman, D (ed.), Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice, London, Sage.
  • Potter, J., 1998, Discursive Social Psychology: From Attitudes to Evaluative Practices, European Review of Social Psychology, vol. 9(1), pp. 233-266.
  • Potter, J., Wetherell, M., 1987, Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour, London, Sage.
  • Pyysiäinen, J., 2010, Co-constructing a Virtuous Ingroup Attitude? Evaluation of New Business Activities in a Group Interview of Farmers, Text and Talk, vol. 30(6), pp. 701-721.
  • Pyysiäinen, J., Vesala, K.M., 2013, Activating Farmers: Uses ofEntrepreneurship Discourse in the Rhetoric of Policy Implemented, Discourse and Communication, vol. 7(1), pp. 55-73.
  • Rauch, ?., Wiklund, J., Lumpkin, G.T., Frese, M., 2009, Entrepreneurial Orientation and Business Performance: An Assessment of Past Research and Suggestions for the Future, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 33(3), pp. 761-87.
  • Sillince, J.A.A., Suddaby, R., 2008, Organizational Rhetoric: Bridging Management and Communication Scholarship, Management Communication Quarterly, vol. 22( 1), pp. 5-12.
  • Vesala, K.M., 2008, A Theoretical and Methodological Approach to the Study of the Assessment and Development of Entrepreneurial Skills in the Farm Context, in: Vesala, K.M., Pyysiäinen, J. (eds.), Understanding Entrepreneurial Skills in the Farm Context, Frick, CH, Research Institute of Organic Agriculture FiBL.
  • Vesala, K.M., Peura, J., 2007, Läheisten asiakassuhteiden luominen monialaisten maatilayrittäjien asenteissa [Creating Close Customer Relations in the Attitudes of Diversified Farm Entrepreneurs], in: Vesala, K.M., Rantanen, ? (eds.), Argumentaatio ja tulkinta. Laadullisen asennetutkimuksen lahestymistapa [Argumentation and Interpretation: The Qualitative Attitude Approach], Helsinki, Gaudeamus.
  • Vesala, KM., Rantanen, T, 2007, Laadullinen asennetutkxmus: lähtökohtia, periaatteita, mahdollisuuhia [Qualitative Attitude Approach: Departure Points, Principles, Possibilities], in: Vesala, K.M., Rantanen, ? (eds.), Argumentaatio ja tulkinta. Laadullisen asennetutkimuksen lahestymistapa, Helsinki, Gaudeamus.
  • Wales, W.J., Gupta, VK, Mousa, F.-T, 201 1, Empirical Research on Entrepreneurial Orientation: An Assessment and Suggestions for Future Research, International Small Business Journal, Epub ahead of print, 13 November, DOI: 10.11777/0266242611418261.
  • Wales, W, Monsen, E., McKelvie, ?., 201 1, The Organizational Pervasiveness of Entrepreneurial Orientation, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 35(5), pp. 895-923.
  • Wiklund, J., 1999, The Sustainability of the Entrepreneurial Orientation - Performance Relationship, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 24(1), pp. 37-48.
  • Wiklund, J., Shepherd, D, 2003, Knowledge-Based Resources, Entrepreneurial Orientation, and the Performance of Small and Medium-Sized Businesses, Strategic Management Review, vol. 24(1), pp. 1307-14.
Typ dokumentu
Identyfikator YADDA

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.