Zasady zarządzania Internetem. Wzrost gospodarczy i innowacje w Azji

• Autorzy: Marcin Menkes

Warianty tytułu

Principles of Internet Governance. Economic Growth and Innovation in Asia

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The spread of the Internet tremendously increased importance of knowledge in economic activity. Originally the Internet was largely self-regulated, which did not please certain Asian states, sceptical towards the civil society concept. Certain technical elements of the original Internet set-up are close to exhaustion, which requires a global consensus in terms of Internet governance. The process will remain decentralised and economically too significant to voluntarily self-exclude oneself from decision-making. Asia either acknowledges that the only credible Internet community may participate in the dialogue, and thus indirectly influence talks, or will be compelled to accept solutions reached in states whose importance in the global economy has diminished over recent years.(original abstract)

Upowszechnienie się Internetu przyczyniło się do istotnego wzrostu znaczenia wiedzy w procesie gospodarowania. Od początku Internetem zarządzano zgodnie z liberalnymi założeniami, bazującymi na auto-regulacji, co nie odpowiadało części państw azjatyckich, niechętnych koncepcji społeczeństwa obywatelskiego. Pewne elementy oryginalnej architektury internetowej z przyczyn technicznych niebawem ulegną wyczerpaniu, co czyni koniecznym osiągnięcie globalnego porozumienia w sprawie jego dalszych losów. Zarządzanie siecią pozostanie zdecentralizowane, a gospodarcza jej doniosłość jest zbyt wielka, aby dobrowolnie zdecydować się na samowykluczenie z procesów decyzyjnych. Albo zatem państwa azjatyckie zrozumieją, że jedynym sposobem uczestniczenia w zarządzaniu Internetem jest zezwolenie na swobodę internetową, co umożliwi pośrednie oddziaływanie na zakres prowadzonych rozmów, albo też zostaną zmuszone do akceptacji rozwiązań wypracowanych w państwach, których gospodarcze znaczenie pod innymi względami istotnie w ostatnich latach zmalało.(abstrakt oryginalny)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Management of the economy; Internet

PL

Zarządzanie gospodarką; Internet

• Czasopismo: Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu
• Rocznik: 2012
• Numer: nr 257 Innovation as a Factor of the Development of the Asia-Pacific Region
• Strony: 141--156

Twórcy

autor

Marcin Menkes

• Warsaw School of Economics, Poland

Bibliografia

• Abbott J., The Political Economy of the Internet in Asia and the Pacific: Digital Divides, Economic Competitiveness, and Security Challenges, Praeger Publishers, Westport 2004.
• Akamai, The State of the Internet. Q3 2001, http://www.akamai.com/stateoftheinternet/ (accessed: 16.04.2012).
• Ang P.-H., Loh Ch.-M., Internet Development in Asia, http://bit.ly/HM5gh9 (accessed: 15.04.2012).
• Brignall M., Consumer group warning over Internet exclusion, The Guardian, 8 May 2009.
• Caslon Analytics, Digital Divides in Asia, http://bit.ly/IPJeLU (accessed: 16.04.2012).
• Chip H., Vietnam: state of social media one year after facebook block, Global Voices, 25 January 2011.
• Clinton H., Internet Rights and Wrongs: Choices & Challenges in a Networked World, George Washington University, 15 February 2011, transcript and video-recording, http://1.usa.gov/ISTqRj (accessed: 16.04.2012).
• Cosenza V., La mappa dei social network nel mondo - dicembre 2011, http://www.vincos.it (accessed: 16.04.2012).
• Crawford S., The new digital divide, The New York Times, 3 December 2011
• Czerpak P., Znaczenie technologii informacyjnych i komunikacyjnych w stosunkach międzynarodowych a pozycja USA, [in:] K. Kłosiński (Ed.), Stany Zjednoczone. Obrona hegemonii w XXI wieku, Wydawnictwo KUL, Lublin 2009, pp. 353-372.
• Department for Communities and Local Government (UK), Understanding Digital Exclusion. Research Report, Wetherby 2008.
• Department of State (US), Media Note, 23 March 2012, http://1.usa.gov/JmED3r (accessed: 19.04.2012).
• Devraj R., Digital Divide Sharpens Rich-Poor Gap, Inter Press Services, 21 July 2000, http://bit.ly/ HM36yh (accessed: 15.04.2012).
• Faure M., Skogh G., The Economic Analysis of Environmental Policy and Law: An Introduction, Edward Elgar Publishing 2003.
• Freedom House, Freedom on the Net. A Global Assessment of Internet and Digital Media, 1 April 2009.
• Freedom House, Freedom on the Press 2009, 2009.
• Freedom House, Leaping Over the Firewall: A Review of Censorship Circumvention Tools, 2011.
• G20, Leaders' Statement, The Pittsburgh Summit, 24-25 September 2009.
• Internet World Stats, 31 December 2011, http://bit.ly/HHwVCA (accessed: 15.04.2012).
• Internet World Stats, The Digital Divide, ICT and the 50 x 15 Initiative, 2004, http://bit.ly/HM16WL (accessed: 15.04.2012).
• ITU, Statistics, http://bit.ly/HJ69W2, http://bit.ly/IMPLXK and http://bit.ly/HLJNVz (accessed: 15.04.2012).
• ITU, Tunis Agenda for the Information Society, 18 November 2005, par. 34 (ITU document no. WSIS- 05/TUNIS/DOC/6(Rev. 1)-E).
• McKellogg J., Freedom house: Internet censorship circumvention tools effective, lack security, Voice of America, 15 April 2011, http://bit.ly/HTy9pT (accessed: 19.04.2012).
• John G., Breaking the great firewall: The effectiveness of government imposed Internet censorship, Yale Law & Technology, 24 October 2011.
• Menkes M., G20 Cannes summit: Crisis governance under evolving circumstances, PISM Bulletin 2011, No. 100 (317).
• Menkes M., IMF's governance reform in the shadow of current-accounts balance debate, PISM Bulletin 2010, No. 131 (207).
• Menkes M., The G-20 Agriculture Talks Trap, "The Great Indian Dream", September 2011.
• Maurice censure le site communautaire Facebook, Mauritius Today, 13 November 2007, http://bit.ly/ HGLqlm (accessed: 16.04.2012).
• McManus L., Options for companies dealing with Internet censorship abroad, Yale Law & Technology, 23 October 2011.
• Minteh B., Internet Censorship and Economic Growth in China, The Global Vision Institute, http://bit. ly/J5MaUr (accessed: 16.04.2012).
• Mrozov E., The net delusion: The dark side of internet freedom, Public Affairs 2011.
• Obama B., International Strategy for Cyberspace. Prosperity, Security, and Openness in a Networked World, Washington, May 2011.
• OECD, Communiqué on principles for Internet Policy-making, Paris, 28-29 June 2011.
• OECD, Council Recommendation on Principles for Internet Policymaking, 13 December 2011.
• OECD, The Seoul Declaration for the Future of the Internet Economy, Seoul, 17-18 June 2008.
• Oweis Y., Syrian Users of Facebook Said on Friday the Authorities had Blocked Access to the Social Network Web Site as Part of a Crackdown on Political Activism on the Internet, Reuters, 23 November 2007.
• Press L., The State of the Internet: Growth and Gaps, 2000, http://bit.ly/IPIgPS (accessed: 16.04.2012).
• Reporters without Borders, Internet Enemies, http://en.rsf.org/ (accessed: 16.04.2012).
• Schulaman M., The State Department's shameful record on Internet freedom, The New Republic, 8 August 2011.
• The Council of Europe, Declaration on Internet Governance Principles, 21 September 2011.
• The Global Information Technology Report 2010-2011. Transformations 2.0., 10th anniversary edition, World Economic Forum, Geneva 2011.
• Thierer A., 15 years on, President Clinton's 5 principles for Internet policy remain the perfect paradigm, Forbes, 12 February 2012.
• UNESCO Doc. no. 36 C/49, 10 October 2011.
• White House, The Framework for Global Electronic Commerce, 1997, http://1.usa.gov/HNEggk (accessed: 15.04.2012).
• Wong P.-K., ICT Production and Diffusion in Asia: Digital Dividends or Digital Divide?, Centre for Management of Innovation and Technopreneurship National University of Singapore, Reference No. WP2001-02, 2001.
• World Resources Institute, Earth Trends. Access to Information: Internet Users per 1000 People, based on ITU, World Telecommunication Indicators, Geneva 2009.
• Xiaoming H., Kay Ch.-S., Factors affecting Internet development: An Asian survey, 2004, http://bit.ly/ HM3zjR (accessed: 15.04.2012).