Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2013 | nr 37 | 169--189
Tytuł artykułu

CSR strategies in Greater China: Global, East Asian, American, European Style?

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
The concept of Corporate Social Responsibility emerged in the United States and spread to Europe and Asia while being adapted to national/local characteristics. Since borders between markets and societies are blurring and globalization is promoting MNCs which find themselves acting in hybrid societies, international institutions put efforts into the development and moral acceptance of global CSR standards. The scientific interest in CSR focused on the conflicts between company returns and benefits for society. The resulting concepts of performance-oriented, awareness-oriented and welfare-oriented CSR should facilitate the evaluation of CSR strategies implemented by MNCs. In research on the cultural dimensions of economies, it might be possible to allocate geographically the three concepts. Regarding the newly emerging Chinese MNCs, the paper aims to shed light on which concept they follow. On the one hand, CSR concepts of American and/or European MNCs that are present in China might serve as a role model; on the other hand, by learning from Taiwanese/ Hong Kong MNCs, a "greater China CSR approach" might emerge. Empirical studies and own field research suggest that compared to American and European companies, CSR is less deeply rooted in Chinese companies. Furthermore, significant differences between Mainland China, Hong Kong and Taiwanese companies indicate that a Greater Chinese CSR approach does not yet exist. Therefore, it cannot be assumed that American and European CSR concepts will experience a Chinese influence in the near future. (original abstract)
Opis fizyczny
  • East Asian Center
  • Warsaw School of Economics, Poland
  • Abbott, W.F. Monsen, R.J. (1979), On the Measurement of Corporate Social Responsibility: Self-reported Disclosures as a Method of Measuring Corporate Social Involvement. "Academy of Management Involvement", 22, 501-515.
  • Aupperle, K.E., Carroll, A.B., Hatfield, J.D. (1985), An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability. "Academy of Management Journal", 28, 446-463.
  • Bowen, H.R. (1953), Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. New York Harper & Row.
  • Broomhill, R. (2007), Corporate Social Responsibility: Key Issues and Debates. Dunstan Paper, No.1.
  • Carroll, A.B. (1999), Corporate Social Responsibility - Evolution of Definitional Construct. "Business and Society", No. 38/3, 268-295.
  • Chang, C.P. (2009), The relationships among corporate social responsibility, corporate image and economic performance of high-tech industries in Taiwan. "Quality & Quantity", Vol. 43, No. 3,417-429.
  • Czarniawska, B. Joerges, B. (1996), Travels of ideas, in: B. Czarniawska, G. Sevon (eds), Translating organizational change, Berlin, de Gruyter, pp. 13-48.
  • China Ministry of Commerce (2012); (accessed on 27.08.2012).
  • Crane, A. et al (eds) (2008), The Oxford Handbook on Corporate Social Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Eells, R. (1956), Corporate Giving in a Free Society. New York: Harper.
  • Eilbert, H. Parket, I.R. (1973), The Current Status of Corporate Social Responsibility. "Business Horizon", No. 16, 5-14.
  • Epstein, E.M. (1987), The Corporate Social Policy Process: Beyond Business Ethics, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Corporate Social Responsiveness. "California Management Review", No. 29,99-114.
  • Frederick, W.C. (1960), The Growing Concern over Business Responsibility. "California Management Review", No. 2, 54-61.
  • Freeman, R.E. et al (1984), Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gao, Y. (2011), CSR in an emerging country: a content analysis of CSR reports of listed companies. "Baltic Journal of Management", Vol. 6, No. 2,263-291.
  • Habisch, A. et al (eds) (2005), Corporate Social Responsibility across Europe. Berlin: Springer.
  • Heald, M. (1957), Management's Responsibility to Society - The Growth of an Idea. "The Business History Review", No. 31/4, 375-384.
  • Hofstede, G. (2006), What Did GLOBE Really Measure? Researches' Minds versus Respondents' Minds. "Journal of International Business Studies", No. 37, 882-896.
  • Hofstede, G. (1980), Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Berverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Hongkong Industrialist (2007), Corporate Social Responsibility - Ethical Business. May, 12-19.
  • House, R. et al (eds) (2004), Culture, Leadership and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Ip, P.K. (2008), Corporate Social Responsibility and Crony Capitalism in Taiwan. "Journal of Business Ethics", No.79,167-177.
  • Javidan, M. et al (2006), Conceptualizing and Measuring Cultures and their Consequences: A Comparative Review of GLOBE's and Hofstede's Approaches. "Journal of International Business Studies", No. 37, 897-914.
  • Jenkins, R. (2005), Globalization, Corporate Social Responsibility and Poverty. "International Affairs", No. 82/3, 525-540.
  • Johnson, H. (1971), Business in Contemporary Society: Framework and Issues. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  • Kanji, G.K. Chopra, P.K. (2010), Corporate Social Responsibility in a Global Economy. "Total Quality Management", No. 21/2,119-143.
  • Kannekant, S. Viney, M. (2008), A Journey of Charity to Responsibility and Fashion to Profession. "Domaine", No. 1/1, 8-14.
  • Klein, N. (2000), No Logo: Taking Aim at the Brand Bullies. Toronto: Vintage Canada.
  • Kline, J. (1985), International Codes and Multinational Business: Setting Guidelines for International Business Operations. London: Quorum Books.
  • Maignan, I. and Ralston, D.A. (2002), Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe and the U.S. "Journal of International Business Studies", No. 33/3, 497-514.
  • OECD (2009), Overview of Selected Initiatives and Instruments Relevant to Corporate Social Responsibility. Regional Conference on Corporate Social Responsibility, 2-3 November.
  • Rigov, D. Zollo, M. (2007), Corporate Social Responsibility from a Socio-Institutional Perspective - The Impact of National Culture on Corporate Social Performance. "Corporate Governance", No. 7/4,476-485.
  • Rothlin, S. (2010), Towards a Socially Responsible China: A Preliminary Investigation of the Implementation of the Global Compact. "Journal of International Business Ethics", Vol. 3 No.l, 3-13.
  • Rowe, J.K. (2005), Corporate Social Responsibility as Business Strategy [in:] R. Lipschutz, Rowe J.K. (eds), Globalization, Governmentality and Global Politics - Regulation for the Rest of US? London: Taylor & Francis Sethi, S.P. (1975), Dimensions of Corporate Social Performance: An Analytic Framework. "California Management Review", No. 17, 58-64.
  • Sino-German Corporate Social Responsibility Project (2012); (accessed on 27.08.2012).
  • Tipton, F.B. (2009), Modeling National Identities and Cultural Change: The Western European, Japanese, and United States Experiences Compared. "International Journal of Cross Cultural Management", No. 9/2,145-168.
  • Torrence, M. (2011), Persuasive Authority Beyond the State: A Theoretical Analysis of Transnational Corporate Social Responsibility Norms as Legal Reasons Within Positive Legal Systems. Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Law, York University, Toronto. York University Library.
  • Tsoi, J. (2010), Stakeholders' Perceptions and Future Scenarios to Improve Corporate Social Responsibility in Hong Kong and Mainland China. "Journal of Business Ethics", No. 91, 391-404.
  • United Nations (1990), Code of Conduct of Transnational Corporations. A/RES/45/186. 21 December.
  • Waldman, A.D. (2006), Culture and Leadership Predictors of Corporate Social Responsibility Value of Top Management: A GLOBE Study of 15 Countries. "Journal of International Business Studies", No. 37, 823-837.
  • Walton, C.C. (1967), Corporate Social Responsibility. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  • Wang, L. and Juslin, H. (2009), The Impact of Chinese Culture on Corporate Social Responsibility: The Harmony Approach. "Journal of Business Ethics", No. 88/3 Supplement, 433-451.
  • Wartik, S.L. and Cochran P.L. (1985), The Evolution of the Corporate Social Performance Model. "Academy of Management Review", No.10, 758-769.
  • Welford, R. (2005), Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe, North America and Asia. JCC 17, http://
  • Wong, L. (2009), Corporate social responsibility in China: Between the market and the search for a sustainable growth development. "Asian Business & Management", No. 8, 129-148.
  • Zadek, S. (2001), The Civil Corporation: The New Economy of Corporate Citizenship. London: Earthscan.
Typ dokumentu
Identyfikator YADDA

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.