Nadzór korporacyjny nad firmami notowanymi na giełdzie na Litwie

• Autorzy: Asta Aleliūnaitė , Christauskas Ceslovas

Warianty tytułu

Corporate Governance of Lithuanian Listed Companies

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The main problem examined in the article is the problem of reliability and accessibility of information about corporate governance of Lithuanian listed companies to stakeholders and the shortage of scientific research and practical solutions on this issue in Lithuania. The data officially published in annual financial statements of Lithuanian corporations does not present the full situation of corporate governance quality or risk areas related to corporate governance, and, therefore, does not enable defining reliably if the corporations are able to achieve their goals and strategies in the future. (fragment of text)

Niniejszy artykuł analizuje kwestię wiarygodności informacyjnej i dostępu akcjonariuszy do informacji dotyczących nadzoru korporacyjnego nad litewskimi spółkami akcyjnymi, uwzględniając również dostępność popularnych teorii ładu korporacyjnego (teoria agencji, dobrego gospodarza i zależności zasobowych). Autorzy przedstawiają obowiązujące uregulowania prawne w zakresie nadzoru korporacyjnego oraz zwracają uwagę na deficyt badań naukowych w tym obszarze i brak funkcjonalnych modeli dostosowanych do realiów kraju. W artykule przedstawione są wyniki badań empirycznych, opartych na analizie porównawczej dominujących modeli nadzoru korporacyjnego litewskich spółek akcyjnych w latach 2006 i 2010. Ocenie poddano cechy charakterystyczne spółek i zmiany, jakie zaszły w przedziale czterech lat w jedynym z obszarów systemu ładu korporacyjnego jakim jest zarząd. (abstrakt oryginalny)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Stock exchange; Stock market companies; Corporate governance

PL

Giełda; Spółki giełdowe; Ład korporacyjny

• Czasopismo: Folia Pomeranae Universitatis Technologiae Stetinensis. Oeconomica
• Rocznik: 2013
• Numer: nr 73
• Strony: 7--30

Twórcy

autor

Asta Aleliūnaitė

• Kaunas University of Technology, Lithuania

autor

Christauskas Ceslovas

• Kaunas University of Technology, Lithuania

Bibliografia

• A Premium for Good Governance. 2002. The McKinsey Quarterly. http://www.mckinsey-quarterly. com/Governance/Boards/A_premium_for_good_governance
• Adams R.B., Ferreira D. 2005. A Theory of Friendly Boards. Finance Working Paper. 100/2005. http://www.ecgi.org
• Bauer R., Guenster N., Otten R. 2003. Empirical Evidence on Corporate Governance in Europe. The Effect on Stock Returns, firm Value and Performance. Journal of Asset Management.
• Belickas l. 2004. Įmonių valdymas: vidaus audito įtaka. Apskaitos, audito ir mokesčių aktualijos. No. 16. www.theiia.org/chapters/index.cfm/view.download/fileid/3308/cid/303
• Ben-Haim Y. 2006. Info-Gap Theory: Robust Decisions Under Severe Uncertainty. 2nd edition, Academic Press, London. http://www.cs.utep.edu/interval-comp/infogap05.html
• Berle A., Means G. 1932. The modern corporation and private property. New York. http://www .britannica.com/eb/topic-387168/The-Modern-Corporation-and-Private-Property
• Boyd B. 1990. Corporate Linkages and Organizational Environment: A Test of the Resource Dependence model. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 1196, 419-430.
• Burton P. 2000. Corporate Governance. Vol. 8, No. 3, 194-203.
• Cheong M.P., Sheble G.B., Berleant D. 2004. Business Intelligence Using Information Gap Decision Theory and Data Mining Approach in Competitive Bidding. http://class.ee.iastate.edu /berleant/home/Research/Pdfs/MarketInteractionAndMarketPower/EPRC04.pdf
• Coase R.H. 1937. The Nature of the Firm, Economica, 4, 386-405.
• Corporate Governance for Belgium Listed Companies (The Cardon Report). 1998. Belgium Commission on Corporate Governance, Brussels Stock Echange, Banking and Finance Commission.
• Corporate Governance Principles. 2001. Japan Corporate Governance Committee and Corporate Governance Forum of Japan.
• Čerka P. 2004. Kodeksų įtaka bendrovės valdymui. // Organizacijų vadyba: sisteminiai tyrimai. No. 32, 7-17. http://www.cerka.lt/index_files/Page1193.htm
• Dičpetris L. 2003. Organizacijų valdomumas. Vilnius. http://www.theiia.org/chapters /pubdocs/303 /Organizaciju_valdomumas.pdf
• Donaldson J., Peston l. 1995. The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. Academy of Management Review, Vol 20, No. 1, 65-91.
• Eisenhardt K.M. 1989. Agency theory: an assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 1, 57-74.
• Euroshareholders Corporate Governance Guidelines (2000). The European Shareholders Group (Confederation of European Shareholders Associations). http://www.ecgi.org /codes /documents/euroshareholders_2000.pdf
• Fahy M., Roche J., Weiner A. 2004. Beyond Governance: Creating Corporate Value through Performance, Conformance and Responsibility. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. West Sussex, England. ISBN 0-470-01151-3.
• Fama E.F., Jensen M.C. 1983. Separation of Ownership and Control. Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. XXVI. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=94034
• Forbes D.F., Milliken F.J. 1999. Cognition and Corporate Governance: Understanding Boards of Directors as Strategic Decision-Making Groups. The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 24, No. 3, 489-505.
• Fiedler F.E. 1967. A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill. http://en .wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiedler_contingency_model
• Finch N. 2003. The Future of Corporate Governance in Australia. Will Australia take the Right Track? http://ssrn.com/902789
• Freeman R.E. 1984. Strategic Management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
• Friedman A.L., Miles S. 2002. Developing Stakeholder Theory. Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 39, No. 1, 1-21.
• Hahn M. 2010. Resource Dependence Perspective in Management. http://www.en .articlesgratuits .com/resource-dependence-perspective-in-management-id1621.php
• Hermanson D., Rittenberg L. 2003. Internal Audit and Organizational Governance. The Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation. http://www.theiia.org
• Hill J.G. 1994. Institutional Investors and Corporate Governance in Australia. Baums, Buxbaum and Hopt, eds., Walter de Gruyter & Co, Berlin/New York, 583-607.
• Huse M. 2005. Corporate Governance: Understanding Important Contingencies. Corporate Ownership & Control. Vol. 2, Issue 4.
• ICGN Statement on Global Corporate Governance Principles. (2005). The International Corporate Governance Network. London. http://www.ecgi.org/codes/documents/revised_principles _jul2005.pdf
• International Finance Corporation (IFC). http://www.ifc.org/ifcext/economics.nsf/Content/CGCorporateGovernanceattheWorld+ Bank
• International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing. http://www.theiia.org /guidance/standards-and-practices/professional-practices-framework/standards/standards-forthe- professional-practice-of-internal-auditing/
• Jensen M.C., Meckling W.H. 1976. Theory of the firm: managerial behaviour, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3.
• Kesner I.F., Dalton D.L. 1986. Boards of Directors and the checks and (im)balancies of corporate governance. Business Horizons, Vol. 29, Issue 5, 17-23.
• Levitt A. 1999. An Essential Next Step in the Evolution of Corporate Governance. Speech to the Audit Committee Symposium. www.theiia.org
• Lietuvos Respublikos akcinių bendrovių įstatymas. 2000-07-13. No. VIII, 1835.
• Lietuvos Respublikos civilinis kodeksas. 2000-07-18 No. VIII, 1864.
• McCarthy M.A., Lindenmayer D.B. 2007. Info-gap decision theory for assessing the management of catchments for timber production and urban water supply. Environmental Management, Vol. 39, No. 4, 553-562.
• McConvill J.A. 2005. Of Stewards, Surfboards and Homo Sapiens: Reflections on the Regulation of Contemporary Corporate Governance.
• Monks R.A.G., Minow N. 2001. Corporate Governance. 2d Edition, Malden: MA, Blackwell Publishing.
• OECD Principles of Corporate Governance. 2004. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/32/18 /31557724 .pdf
• Pfeffer J. 1972. Size and composition of corporate boards of directors: The organization and its environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 17, No. 2, 218-229.
• Pfeffer J. 1982. Organizations and Organization Theory. Marshfeld, MA, Ritman. http://www .stanford.edu/~psak/pattil_files/PattyRDT.pdf - week 2
• Pfeffer J., Salancik G.R. 1978. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York, NY, Harper and Row. http://www.stanford.edu/~psak/pattil_files /PattyRDT.pdf - week 2
• Phillips R. 2003. Stakeholder Theory and Organizational Ethics. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler. http://www.bkconnection.com/static/stakeholdertheorypr.pdf
• Prendergast C. 1999. The Provision of Incentives in Firms. Journal of Economic Literature, 37, 7-63.
• Principles of Good Corporate Governance and Best Practice Recommendation. (2003) The Australian Stock Exchange Corporate Governance Council. http://www.ecgi.org/codes /all_codes.php
• Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (Cadbury Report). (1992). The Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance. http://www .ecgi.org
• Ruud F. 2003. The Internal Audit Function: An Integral Part of Organizational Governance. The Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation. http://www.theiia.org
• Ruud A.I. van Frederikslust, Ang J.S., Sudarsanam P.S. 2008. Corporate governance and corporate finance : a European perspective. New York, NY: Routledge.
• Sanchez A.V. 2004. Development of Corporate Governance Systems; Agency Theory Versus Stewardship Theory in Welsh Agrarian Cooperative Societies. http://www.uhu.es/alfonso_vargas /archivos/EURAM2004.pdf
• Scot W.R. 2003. Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems. (5th ed.), Prentice Hall.
• Sellevol T., Huse M., Hansen C. 2007. Research Report "The Value Creating Board". Norwegian School of Management.
• Stačiokas R., Rupšys R. 2005. Internal Audit Reporting Relationships: the Analysis of Reporting Lines. Engineering Economics. No. 3: 49-53.
• Stačiokas R., Rupšys R. 2005. Internal Audit and Its Role in Organizational Government. Organizacijų vadyba: Sisteminiai tyrimai. ISSNA 1392-1142, 169-179.
• Studija "Bendrovių valdymo sistema, valdymo modelio pasirinkimas ir funkcionavimo ypatumai". (2006). Advokatų kontora "Mi kinis, Kavianauskas ir partneriai". http://www.ukmin.lt/lt /strategija/doc/UM_STUDIJA_06-12-14.doc
• Study "10th Annual Corporate Board Effectiveness Study 2006-2007". Heidrich & Struggles, Center for Effective Organizations.
• Tricker R.I. 1994. Board Matters: Building Better Boards. International Corporate Governance: Text Readings and Cases. Prentice Hall. http://www.aso.qld.edu.au/zone_files /Conference_2004 _documents/elizabeth_jameson_-_governance.pdf
• Vazniokas P., Darskuviene V. 2007. Korporatyvinio valdymo sistema mikroekonominiu aspektu. // Taikomoji ekonomika: Sisteminiai tyrimai. 2, 65-85.
• Vilniaus vertybinių popierių bir˛oje listinguojamų bendrovių valdymo kodeksas su komentarais. http://www.baltic.omxnordicexchange.com/files/baltic/Bendroviu_valdymo_kodeksas.pdf
• Williamson O.E. 1981. The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach. The American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 87, 548-577.
• Zahra S.A., Pearce J.A. 1989. Boards of Directors and Corporate Financial Performance: A Review and Integrative Model. Journal of Management, Vol. 15, No. 2, 291-334.