Instruments of Government Support for Innovative Companies in Russia : Beneficiaries and Issues

• Autorzy: Yuri Simachev , Mikhail Kuzyk , Denis Ivanov

Warianty tytułu

Rządowe instrumenty wsparcia innowacyjnych przedsiębiorstw w Rosji - beneficjenci i problemy

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In recent years the Russian innovation policy has made a significant progress that manifests itself in discussing the ways of fostering innovation, developing its methodological, institutional and resource base as well as a higher perceptiveness of innovation fostering tools by decision-makers. However, the policy has not yet succeeded in improving business innovation activities that remain local, thus not giving prerequisites to transform the general macroeconomic context. Basing on a questionnaire survey of the top managers of more than 600 Russian industrial enterprises carried out in autumn 2011, the authors analyze how fostering mechanisms (tax incentives, direct financial support for projects, development institutes, etc.) affect business innovation performance, and identify the business demand for public policies. (original abstract)

W ostatnich latach dokonano znacznego postępu w zakresie polityki innowacyjnej w Rosji, co uwidacznia się między innymi w trwającej pogłębionej dyskusji nad sposobami stymulowania innowacyjności, w rozwoju zaplecza metodologicznego, instytucjonalnego oraz zasobowego, jak również w coraz silniejszej świadomości istnienia instrumentów pro-innowacyjnych wśród decydentów. Mimo to jednak skuteczność polityki innowacyjnej na poziomie makroekonomicznym pozostaje wciąż niska. Celem artykułu, prezentującego wyniki badania ankietowego ponad 600 rosyjskich menedżerów jest wskazanie najbardziej pożądanych mechanizmów wspierania innowacyjności z perspektywy przedsiębiorców. (abstrakt oryginalny)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Innovation policy; Innovative character; Enterprise innovation; Questionnaire survey

PL

Polityka innowacyjna; Innowacyjność; Innowacyjność przedsiębiorstw; Badania ankietowe

• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe / Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu
• Rocznik: 2012
• Numer: nr 246
• Strony: 183--201

Twórcy

autor

Yuri Simachev

• Interdepartmental Analytical Center, Moscow

autor

Mikhail Kuzyk

• Interdepartmental Analytical Center, Moscow

autor

Denis Ivanov

• Interdepartmental Analytical Center, Moscow

Bibliografia

• Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., Zilibotti, F., 2006, Distance to Frontier, Selection and Economic Growth, Journal of the European Economic Association, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 37-74.
• Almeida, R., Fernandes, A., 2008, Openness and Technological Innovations in Developing Countries: Evidence from From-Level Analysis, Journal of Development Studies, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 701-727.
• Antonelli, C., Crespi, F., Matthew, 2011, Effects and R&D Subsidies: Knowledge Cumulability in High-Tech and Low-Tech Industries, Department of Economics"S. Cognetti de Martiis" Working Paper Series, no. 11.
• Aschhoff, B., 2010, Who Gets the Money? The Dynamics of R&D Project Subsidies in Germany, Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbücher fur Nationalökonomie und Statistik), vol. 230, no. 5, pp. 522-546.
• Busom, I., 2000, An Empirical Evaluation of the Effects of R&D Subsidies, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 111-148.
• Cantner, U., Kösters, S., 2009, Picking the Winner? - Empirical Evidence on the Targeting of R&D Subsidies to Start-Ups, Jena Economic Research Papers, no. 2009-093.
• Cohen, W., Levinthal, D., 1990, Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 128-152.
• Fier, A., Heneric, O., 2005, Public R&D Policy: The Right Turns of the Wrong Screw? The Case of the German Biotechnology Industry, ZEW Discussion Papers, no. 05-60.
• Freeman, C., 1982, Economics of Industrial Innovation, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
• Golikova, V., Gonchar, V., Kuznetsov, B., 2012, Vliyanie Globalizatsii na Povedenie Rossiyskikih Promyshlennykh Predpriyatiy (Globalization's Impact on Behavior of Russian Industrial Enterprises), XII International Scientific on Social and Economic Development Problems, vol. 4, pp. 21-30.
• Gokhberg, L., Kuznetsova, I., 2009, Innovatsiiv Rossiyskoy Ekonomike: Stagnatsiya v Predddverii Krizisa? (Innovation in Russian Economy: Stagnation in Anticipation of Crisis?), Forsayt, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 28-46.
• Gokhberg, L., Kuznetsova, T., Rud', V., 2010, Analiz Innovatsionnykh Rezhimov v Rossiyskoy Ekonomike, Forsayt, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 3-18.
• Goldberg, I., Goddard, J., Kuriakose, S., Racine, J.-L., 2011, Igniting Innovation: Rethinking the Role of Government in Emerging Europe and Central Asia, World Bank, Washington, DC.
• Hall, B., van Reenen, J., 2000, How Effective Are Fiscal Incentives for R&D? A Review for the Evidence, Research Policy, vol. 29, no. 4-5, pp. 449-469.
• Klette, T., Moen, J., Grilliches, Z., 2000, Do Subsidies to Commercial R&D Reduce Market Failures?, Research Policy, vol. 29, no. 4-5, pp. 471-495.
• Kozlov, K., Sokolov, D., Yudaeva, K., 2004, Innovatsionnya Aktivnost' Rossiyskikh Firm, Ekonomicheskiy Zhurnal VShE, no. 3, pp. 399-419.
• Lach, S., 2002, Do R&D Subsidies Stimulate Or Displace Private R&D? Evidence from Israel, Journal of Industrial Economics, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 369-390.
• Loury, G., 1979, Market Structure and Innovation, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 395-410.
• Martin, S., Scott, J., 2000, The Nature of Innovation Market Failure and The Design of Public Support for Private Innovation, Research Policy, vol. 29, no. 4-5, pp. 437-447.
• Ortega-Argilles, R., Piva, M.-C., Potters, L., Vivarelli, M., 2009, Is Corporate R&D Investment in High-Tech Sectors more Efficient? Some Guidelinnes for European Research Policy, Institute for Prospective and technologival Studies Working Paper, no. 2009-09.
• Pack, H., Saggi, K., 1997, Inflows of Foreign Technology and Indigenous Technological Development, Review of Development Economics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 81-98.
• Polterovich, V., 2009, Problema Formirovaniya Natsional'noy Innovatsionnoy Sistemy (Problem of Shaping National Innovation System), Ekonomika i Matematicheskie Metody, no. 2, pp. 3-18.
• Polterovich, V., Popov, V., 2006, Evolyutsionnaya Teoriya Ekonomicheskoy Politiki. Chast'II. Neobkhodimost' Svoevremennogo Pereklyucheniya (Evolutionary Theory of Economic Policy, Part II. Necessity for Well-Timed Switching), Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 8, pp. 46-64.
• Pottelsberghe, B., Van, Nysten, S., Megally, E., 2003, Evaluation of Current Fiscal Incentives for Business R&D in Belgium, Solvay Business School, Brussels, 62 p.
• Roper, S., Love, J., 2002, Innovation and Export Performance: Evidence from the UK and German Manufacturing Firms, Research Policy, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 1087-1102.
• Salomon, R., Shaver, J., 2005, Learning by Exporting: New Insights from Examining Firm Innovation, Journal of Economic & Management Strategy, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 431-460.
• Simachev, Yu., Kuzyk, M., 2010, Instituty v Razvitii (Institutes in Developments), Pryamye Investitsii, no. 4, pp. 16-21.
• Simachev, Yu., Kuzyk, M., 2012, Priuchit'Biznes k Innovatsiyam (Training Business to Innovate), Moskovskie Novosti, no. 61 (253).
• Simachev, Yu., Yakovlev, A., Kuznetsov, B., Gorst, M., Daniltsev, A., Kuzyk, M., Smirnov, S., 2009, An Assessment of Policy Measures to Support Russia's Real Economy, Forschungstelle Osteuropa Bremen Arbeitspapiere und Materialien, no. 102.
• Shane, S., 2009, Why Encouraging More People to Become Entrepreneurs Is Bad Public Policy, Small Business Economics, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 141-149.
• Upravlenie Issledovaniyami i Razrabotkami v Rossiyskikh Kompaniyakh: Natsional'nyy Doklad (Research & Development Management in Russian Companies: National Report), 2011, Assotsiatsiya Menedzherov, Moscow.
• Yasin, Ye., 2005, Prizhivyotsya li Demokratiya v Rossii? ( Will Democracy Survive in Russia?), Novoe Izdatel'stvo, Moscow, 384 p.
• Zasimova, L., Kuznetsov, B., Kuzyk, M., Simachev, Yu., Chulok, A., 2008, Problemy Perekhoda Promyshlennosti na Put' Innovatsionnogo Razvitiya (Problems of Switching Industry to Innovation-Driven Path), "Scientific Reports: Independent Economic Analysis" Series, Paper, No. 201, Moskovskiy Obshchestvennyy Nauchnyy Fond, Moscow, 264 p.