Economic Efficiency in Indian Rubber Industry
The article tries to assess the utilization efficiency of capacity of Indian rubber industry in terms of econometric framework for the period,1979-80 to 2008-09.Capacity output has been obtained at the minimum point of short run average cost curve. The result suggests that there has been declining growth rate of capacity utilization in rubber industry of India during the post reforms period accompanied by declining output growth as well as capacity growth. There exists some excess capacity in the rubber industry which remains unutilized during our study period. The result exhibits that high correlation coefficient between actual output and capacity output for Indian rubber sector implies that major part of under utilization of capacity is intended and low correlation between capacity expansion (CE) and past utilization(CUL) seems to suggest that under utilization, if any, is mainly of the unintended nature, capacity expansions do not move in line with past utilization rates and it also indicates that abolition of restrictions on licensing due to trade liberalization do not help industry to expand capacity. On the other hand, low correlation between capacity expansion (CE) and lagged output (QL ) indicates that unintended excess capacity is varying from year to year in an unsystematic matter. (original abstract)
- 1. Berndt, E.R. and C. Morrison (1981), Capacity utilization: Underlying economic theory and an alternative approach, American Economic Review, vol. 71, no22, pp 48-52.
- 2. Berndt,E.R and Hesse, D(1986):Measuring and assessing capacity utilization of manufacturing sectors of nine OECD countries, European Economic Review, vol 30,pp961-89
- 3. Cassel, J.M. (1937), Excess capacity and monopolistic competition, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 51, pp 426-443.
- 4. Denny, M, M. Fuss and L Waver man(1981), 'Substitution possibilities for Energy: Evidence from U.S. and Canadian manufacturing Industries in E.R. Berndt and B.C. Field, Modeling and measuring national Resources Substitution (Cambridge M.A., MIT Press).
- 5. Fare. R., S. Grosskopf, and E.. Kokkelenberg. (1989). "Measuring Plant Capacity, Utilization and Technical Change: A Nonparametric Approach,' International Economic Review, 30: 655-666.
- 6. Färe, R. (1994). "The Existence of Plant Capacity," International Economic Review, 25: 209-213.
- 7. Friedman. M. (1963), 'More on Archibald versus Chicago', Review of economic studies, vol. 30, pp 65-67.
- 8. Griliches, Z and Y. Ringstad (1971), Economics of scale and the form of the production function, North Holland, Amsterdam.
- 9. Hickman, B.G. (1964), 'On a new method of capacity estimation', Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol.59, pp 529-549.
- 10. Jha, R, Murty, M.N and Satya Paul(1991), Technological change, factor substitution and economies of scale in selected manufacturing industries in India, Journal of Quantitative Economics,vol.7,No.1,pp 165-178.
- 11. Jorgenson, Dale. W and Zvi Griliches (1967), The explanation of productivity change, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 34, pp 249-282.
- 12. Klein, L.R (1960), 'Some theoretical issues in the measurement of capacity', Econometrica, vol.28, no.2, pp272-286.
- 13. Murty, M.N(1986), Interfuel Substitution and Derived Demands for Inputs in the manufacturing sector of India, Journal of Quantitative Economics, vol.2,No.1,pp119-135.
- 14. Nelson.R.A (1989), On the measurement of capacity utilization, The Journal of Industrial Economics, vol.XXXVII, March, 1989.
- 15. Segerson, Katherine and Dale Squires.( 1990). On the Measurement of Economic Capacity Utilization for Multi-Product Industries, Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 44:347-361.
- 16. Viswanathan, P.K. and G. P. Shivakoti (2005), "Promotion of Rubber Agro Forestry Systems in India: Socio-Economic and Institutional Constraints and Development Potential". Paper presented at the Appraisal Meeting on Improving the Productivity of Rubber Smallholdings through Agro forestry Systems, 5-8 September 2005, Songkhla Province,Thailand.