Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2013 | nr 38 | 84--101
Tytuł artykułu

The Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives and Price Premiums on Polish Consumers' Responses: an Experimental Study

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
This article explores whether, how and which forms of corporate social responsibility(CSR) initiatives influence consumer perceptions of the value of and intention to buy responsibly manufactured yogurt, and identifies the impact of the price rise effect on consumer responses. An experimental study was conducted using scenarios with a sample of 421 university students. The results indicate that information about positive corporate behavior evokes higher perceived value and buying intention than information about negative corporate behavior; that responses differ significantly depending on whether or not the CSR initiative relates to the firm's core business; and that there is a level of consumer sensitivity to the price premium for a responsibly made yogurt. This study expands existing knowledge beyond previous areas of focus by demonstrating that a CSR initiative related to a firm's core business generates higher perceived value and buying intention than a non-related initiative, and by showing that there exists a trade-off between functional and social attributes. The findings of this study may be of interest to companies by showing the level of premium price acceptance and by demonstrating that CSR initiatives detached from basic business activity may bring negative consequences in terms of sales volume. (original abstract)
Opis fizyczny
  • Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie
  • Ajzen I., 1985, From Intentions to Actions: A theory of planned behavior, in: J. Kuhl and J. Beckmann (eds.),Action Control. From Cognition to Behavior, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
  • Ajzen I., 1991, The theory of planned behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, pp. 179-211.
  • Antczak Z., 2011, CSR w perspektywie menedżerów oraz konsumentów (wyniki badań), Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, Vol. 220, pp. 367-376.
  • Auger P., Devinney T., 2007, Do What consumers say matter? The misalignment of preferences with unconstrained ethical intentions, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 76, pp. 361-383.
  • Auger P., Burke P., Deviney, T., Louviere J., 2003,What will consumers pay for social product features?, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 42, pp. 281-304.
  • Bhattacharya C.B., Sen S., 2004, Doing Better at Doing Good: when, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives, California Management Review, Vol. 47 No. 1, pp. 9-24.
  • Boulstridge E., Carrigan M., 2000, Do consumers really care about corporate responsibility? Highlighting the attitude-behaviour gap, Journal of Communication Management, Vol. 4, pp. 355-368.
  • Brislin R., 1970, Back-translation for cross-cultural research, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 1, pp. 185-216.
  • Brown T.J., Dacin P.A., 1997, The company and the product: corporate associations and consumer product responses, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 61, pp. 68-84.
  • Brown D., Dillard J., Marshall R.S., 2006, Triple bottom line: a business metaphor for a social construct, working paper, Faculty of Economics and Enterprise, Department of Economics of Enterprise, Autonomous University of Barcelona.
  • Calder B.J., Phillips L.W., Tybout A.M., 1981, Designing research for application, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 8, pp. 197-207
  • Carrete L., Castano R., Felix R., Centeno E., González E., 2012, Green consumer behavior in an emerging economy: confusion, credibility, and compatibility, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 29, No. 7, pp. 470-481.
  • Carroll A.B., 1979, A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 4, pp. 497-505.
  • Carroll A., 1991, The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders, Business Horizons, Vol. 34, pp. 39-48.
  • Carroll A.B., 1999, Corporate social responsibility: evolution of a definitional construct, Business and Society, Vol. 38 No. 3, pp. 268-295.
  • Carrigan M., Attalla A., 2001, The myth of the ethical consumer - do ethics matter in purchase behavior?, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 18 No. 7, pp. 560-578.
  • Carrigan M., Szmigin I., Wright J., 2004, Shopping for a better world? an interpretive study of the potential for ethical consumption within the older market, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 21, No.6, pp. 401-417.
  • Creyer E.H., Ross W.T., 1996, The impact of corporate behavior on perceived product value, Marketing Letters,7(2), pp. 173-185.
  • Cronbach L. J., 1951, Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests, Psychometrika, 16, pp. 297-334.
  • Dodds W.B., Monroe K.B., Grewal D., 1991. Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers' product evaluations, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 307-319.
  • Du S., Bhattacharya C.B., Sen S., 2007, Reaping relational rewards from corporate social responsibility: the role of competitive positioning, International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 24, pp. 224-241.
  • Elkington J., 1999, Cannibals with Forks: Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business (2nd ed.), Mankato, MI: Capstone.
  • Elliott K.A., Freeman R.B., 2001, White hats or Don Quixotes? human rights vigilantes in the global economy, National Bureau of Economic Research working paper.
  • Ettenson R., Smith C. N., Klein J.G., Andrew J., 2006, Rethinking consumer boycotts, Sloan Management Review, 47, pp. 6-7.
  • Ferreira D.A., Avila M.G., de Faria M.D., 2010, Corporate social responsibility and consumers' perception of price, Social Responsibility Journal, Vol. 6, No. 2, 208-221.
  • Friedman M., 1970, The social responsibility of business is to increase its Profits, The New York Times, Vol.32-33, pp. 122-124.
  • Garriga E., Mele D., 2004, Corporate social responsibility theories: mapping the territory, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 53, pp. 51-71.
  • Green T., Peloza J., 2011, How does corporate social responsibility create value for customers?. Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 48-56.
  • Grewal D., Monroe K.B., Krishnan R., 1998, The Effects of price-comparison advertising on buyers' perceptions of acquisition value, transaction value, and behavioral intentions, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 62, pp. 46-59.
  • Ha-Brookshire J.E., Norum P.S., 2011, Willingness to pay for socially responsible products: case of cotton apparel, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 28, No. 5, pp. 344-353.
  • Hair J.F., Black W.C., Rabin B.J., Anderson R.E., 2009, Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.), Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Holbrook M.B., 1994, The nature of customer value: an axiology of services in the consumption experience, in: R.T. Rust, and R.L. Oliver (eds.), Service Quality: New Directions in Theory and Practice, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Klein J., Dawar N., 2004, Corporate social responsibility and consumers' attributions and brand evaluations in a product-harm crisis, International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 21, pp. 203-217.
  • Koszewska M., 2011, Rola konsumentów w rozwoju społecznej odpowiedzialności w Polsce ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem rynku tekstylno-odzieżowego. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, Vol. 220, pp. 327-334.
  • Kukar-Kinney M., Xia L., Monroe K.B., 2007, Consumers' perceptions of the fairness of price-matching refund policies, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 83, No. 3, pp, 325-337.
  • Kytle B., Ruggie J.G., 2005, Corporate social responsibility as risk management: a model for multinationals, Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative, Harvard Kennedy School, Harvard University working paper, No.10.
  • Lee M.P., 2008, A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: its evolutionary path and the road ahead, International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 10, pp. 53-73.
  • Levitt T., 1958, The dangers of social responsibility, Harvard Business Review, 36, pp. 41-50.
  • Margolis J.D., Walsh J.P., 2003. Misery loves companies: rethinking social initiatives by business, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 268-305.
  • Marymount University Center for Ethical Concerns, 1999, The consumers and sweatshops. Retrieved from:
  • McWilliams A., Siegel D., 2001, Corporate social responsibility: a theory of the firm perspective, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 117-127.
  • McWilliams A., Siegel D., 2011. Creating and capturing value: strategic corporate social responsibility, resource-based theory, and sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Management, Vol. 37, No. 5, pp.1480-1495.
  • Mohr L.A., Webb D.J., 2005, The Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility and Price on Consumer Responses, Journal of Consumer Affairs, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 121-147.
  • Mohr L.A, Webb D.J., Harris K.E, 2001, Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? the impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior, Journal of Consumer Affairs, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 45-72.
  • MORI, 2009, Can you hear me? Retrieved from:
  • Moura-Leite R.C., Padgett R.C., 2011, Historical background of corporate social Responsibility, Social Responsibility Journal, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 528-539.
  • Nunnaly J., 1978, Psychometric Theory, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Orlitzky M., Schmidt F.L., Rynes S.L., 2003, Corporate social and financial performance: a meta analysis, Organization Studies, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 403-411.
  • Panel CSR, 2011, Raport z badania 2011. Retrieved from:
  • Porter M.E., 1996, What is strategy?, Harvard Business Review, November-December, pp. 61-78.
  • Roszkowska-Śliż M., 2011, Społeczna odpowiedzialność mediów. Studia przypadków. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, No 220, pp. 257-270.
  • Schwartz M.S., Carroll A.B., 2003, Corporate social responsibility: a three-domain approach, Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4), pp. 503-530.
  • Sen S., Bhattacharya C.B., 2001, Does doing good always lead to doing better? consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 37, 225-243.
  • Sheth J.N, Newman B.I., Gross B.L., 1991, Why we buy what we buy: a theory of consumption values, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 159-170.
  • Smith N.G., 1996, Ethics and the typology of customer value, Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 23, pp.148-153.
  • Smith N.G., 2003, Corporate social responsibility: whether or how?, California Management Review, Vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 52-76.
  • Tabachnick B. G., Fidell L.S., 2007, Using Multivariate Statistics (5th ed.), Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Tian Z., Wang R., Yang W., 2011, Consumer responses to corporate social responsibility (CSR) in China, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 101, pp. 197-212.
  • University of Maryland, Program on International Policy Attitudes, 2000, Americans on globalization: a study of public attitudes. Retrieved from:
  • Valenzuela L.M., Mulki J.P., Jaramillo J.F., 2010, Impact of customer orientation, inducements and ethics on loyalty to the firm: customers' perspective, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 93, pp. 277-291.
  • Wang A., 2011, The effects of firms' advertising disclosures as a reflection of CSR practices on consumer responses, Social Responsibility Journal, Vol. 7 No. 4, pp. 592-603.
  • Zeithaml V., 1988, Consumer perceptions of price, quality and value. A means-end model and synthesis of evidence, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 52No. 3, pp. 2-22.
Typ dokumentu
Identyfikator YADDA

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.