The Causality Relationships between Energy Variables and Sold Industrial Output in Polish Economy

• Autorzy: Rafał Kasperowicz
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Considering that energy is a very important source of industrial production, because production does not exist without energy, there are some significant relations between the use of energy and industrial production. The aim of this paper is to identify the causality relationships between the sold industrial output of Poland and variables describing energy consumption or energy sources. Another aim is to estimate a SIO (sold industrial output) equation. According to it the time-series underwent adjustment procedure Census X11 and Hodrick-Prescott's filter. In this way fluctuations of time series were obtained. The procedure of seeking for the relationships between SIO and variables describing energy use was conducted by Granger causality analysis. Series selected by the causality relationship test were used to estimate SIO equation. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Business cycles; Energy; Industrial production; Research of macroeconomic relationships

PL

Cykl koniunkturalny; Energia; Produkcja przemysłowa; Badanie zależności makroekonomicznych

• Czasopismo: Journal of International Studies
• Rocznik: 2011
• Tom: 4
• Numer: nr 1
• Strony: 69--80

Twórcy

autor

Rafał Kasperowicz

• Poznań University of Economics, Poland

Bibliografia

• Asafu-Adjaye, J., (2000), The relationship between energy consumption, energy prices, and economic growth: time series evidence from Asian developing countries, Energy Econ. 22.
• Auerbach, A. J. (1982), The Index of Leading Indicators: "Measurment without theory", Thirty-five Years Later, The Review of Economics and Statistics No. 82.
• Bennett, A. (2002), Closed-End Country Found Discounds and Systematic UK and US Market movements: Co-integration and Error Corrected Granger Causality Tests, Massey University.
• Boehm, E. A. (2001), The Contribution of Economic Indicator Analysis to Understanding and Forecasting Business Cycles, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, Working Paper No. 17/01.
• Boehm, E. A., Summers, P. M. (1999), Analyzing and Forecasting Business Cycles with the Aid of Economic Indicators, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, Working Paper No. 18/99.
• Charemza, W., Deadman, D. (1997), Nowa Ekonometria, PWE.
• Cheng, S.B., Tin, W.L. (1997), An investigation of co-integration and casuality between energy consumption and economic activity in Taiwan, Province of China. Energy Econ. 19.
• Cieślak, M., Red. Nauk. (2001), Prognozowanie gospodarcze. Metody i zastosowanie, PWN.
• Diedold, F. X., Rudebusch, G. D. (1989), Scoring the Leading Indicators, Journal of Business, Vol. 62, No. 3.
• Evans, M. K. (2003), Practical Business Forecasting, Blackwell Publishers.
• Granger, C. W. J. (2001a), Investigating Casual Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods, (Econometrica, 37, 1969), w: E. Ghysels, N. R, Swanson, M. W. Watson, Essays in Econometrics, Collected Papers of Clive W. J. Granger, Volume II: Causality, Integration and Cointegration, and Long Memory, Cambridge University Press.
• Granger, C. W. J. (2001b), Testing for Causality: A Personal Viewpoint, (Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2, 1980 ), w: E. Ghysels, N. R, Swanson, M. W. Watson, Essays in Econometrics, Collected Papers of Clive W. J. Granger, Volume II: Causality, Integration and Cointegration, and Long Memory, Cambridge University Press.
• Hendry, D. F., Mizon, G. E. (1999), The Pervasiveness of Granger Causality in Econometrics, w: R. F. Engle, H. White, Cointegration, Causality, and Forecasting. A Festschrift in Honour of Clive W. J. Granger, Oxford University Press.
• John, G., Nelson, P., Reetu V. (2007), Unit Root Tests and Structural Breaks: A Survey with Applications, REVISTA DE METODOS CUANTITATIVOS PARA LA ECONOM´IA Y LA EMPRESA (3).
• King, R.G., Rebelo, S.T. (2000), Resuscitating Real Business Cycles, NBER Working Paper.
• Kruszka, M. (2002), Wyodrębnianie wahań cyklicznych, maszynopis powielony, AE Poznań.
• Kydland, F. E., Prescott, E. C. (1990), Business Cycles: Real Facts and Monetary Myth, Federal Reserve Bank of Mineapolis Quarterly Reviev.
• Lucas, Jr. R. E. (1995), Understanding Business Cycles, in F. E. Kydland (ed), Business CycleTheory, The International Library of Critical Writings in Economics, Edward Elgar Publishing Company.
• Marcellino, M. (2004), Leading Indicators: What Have We Learned?, IEP-Bocconi University, IGIER and CEPR.
• Masih, A., Masih, R. (1996), Energy consumption and real income temporal causality, results for a multi-country study based on cointegration and error-correction techniques, Energy Econ. 18.
• McGuckin, R. H., Ozyildrim, A., Zarnowitz, V. (2001), The Composite Index of Leading Economic Indicators: How to Make It More Timely, NBER Working Paper No. 8430.
• Mills, T.C. (2003), Modeling Trends and Cycles in Economic Time Series, Loughborough University.
• Pedersen, T. M. (2002), Alternative Linear and Non-Linear Detrending Techniques: A Comparative analysis based on Euro-Zone Data, Copenhagen: Minystry of Economic and Business Affairs.
• Stern, D. (1993), Energy use and economic growth in the USA, a multivariate approach. Energy Econ. 15.
• Stern, D. (2000), A multivariate cointegration analysis of the role of energy in the US macroeconomy 22.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.14254/2071-8330.2011/4-1/7