The social dialogue in Ukraine

• Autorzy: Victor Zhukov
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Th e article aims to answer the question of why social market economy in Ukraine, as well as in number of post-Soviet states, has not met the expectations. It uses social dialogue as a telling example. In 1990s Ukrainian society became subjected to a multidimensional process of forming labour relations. On the one hand, the process was typical for an immature stage of capitalism, and thus could hardly be expected to lead to the emergence of a social market economy, and on the other it reproduced the worst traditions of socialist labour relations, replacing state paternalism with patronclient relationships. Establishing institutional market infrastructure was supported by social partners' organisations and legitimized by the law. A system of market relations has been created but proved incapable of performing functions essential for sustaining standards and values of economic democracy. 'Social partnership' as an ideology of labour relations was substituted by a new form - 'social dialogue'. Social dialogue has been distorted to a simulation of contemporary labour relations. Formalization of social dialogue has become a way for pro-oligarch, social partners' organisations to gradually monopolize the market, with passive acceptance from dependent, poorly organized and unprotected employees. (original abstract)

Th e article aims to answer the question of why social market economy in Ukraine, as well as in number of post-Soviet states, has not met the expectations. It uses social dialogue as a telling example. In 1990s Ukrainian society became subjected to a multidimensional process of forming labour relations. On the one hand, the process was typical for an immature stage of capitalism, and thus could hardly be expected to lead to the emergence of a social market economy, and on the other it reproduced the worst traditions of socialist labour relations, replacing state paternalism with patronclient relationships. Establishing institutional market infrastructure was supported by social partners' organisations and legitimized by the law. A system of market relations has been created but proved incapable of performing functions essential for sustaining standards and values of economic democracy. 'Social partnership' as an ideology of labour relations was substituted by a new form - 'social dialogue'. Social dialogue has been distorted to a simulation of contemporary labour relations. Formalization of social dialogue has become a way for pro-oligarch, social partners' organisations to gradually monopolize the market, with passive acceptance from dependent, poorly organized and unprotected employees. (abstrakt oryginalny)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Social dialogue

PL

Dialog społeczny

• Czasopismo: Warsaw Forum of Economic Sociology
• Rocznik: 2011
• Tom: 2
• Numer: nr 1 (3)
• Strony: 137--170

Twórcy

autor

Victor Zhukov

• Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Ukraine

Bibliografia

• Aslund A., (2003), Rozbudova kapìtalìzmu. Transformacìï v kraïnah kolišnʹogo Radânsʹkogo bloku, Per. z angl., Kiïv: Duh ì lìtera.
• Avgustìmov V., (1996), Rolʹ organìzacìj robotodavcìv u socìalʹno-trudovih vìdnosinah v Ukraïnì. Socìalʹnij dìalog ì tripartizm v Ukraïnì: zavdannâ ta perspektivi, Kiïv, 2-3 kvìtnâ 1996.
• Berest R., (2002), Profesìjnij ruh na zahìdnoukraïnsʹkih zemlâh v avstrìjsʹkij perìod, w: Narisi ìstorìï profesìjnih spìlok Ukraïni. Federacìâ profspìlok Ukraïni, red. O.M. Stoân,. O.P. Reênt, Kiïv.
• Borisov V.A., (2001), Socialʹnoe partnerstvo v Rossii: specifika ili podmena ponâtij?`"Socis Sociologičeskie issledovaniâ. Žurnаl Rossijskoj Akademii Nauk" 5.
• Burаvoj M., (2009), Trаnzit bez trаnsformаcii: involûciâ Rossii k kаpitаlizmu "Socis Sociologičeskie issledovаniâ. Žurnаl Rossijskoj Аkаdemii Nаuk" 9.
• Buravoj M., (2009), Tranzit bez transformacii: involûciâ Rossii k kapitalizmu, "Socis Sociologičeskie issledovaniâ. Žurnаl Rossijskoj Akademii Nauk" 9
• But M., (2001), Profspіlki nezаležnoї Ukrаїni: reаlії tа perspektivi, "Nаcіonаl'nа bezpekа і oboronа" 8(20): 73-77. Ukrаїns'kij centr ekonomіčnih і polіtičnih doslіdžen' іmenі Oleksаndrа Rаzumkovа.
• CSE Іnstitutu socіologії NАNU, 2003, Sučаsnij stаn, problemi tа tendencії socіаl'no-trudovih vіdnosin v Ukrаїnі: sprobа socіаl'nogo konstruûvаnnâ. Kiїv: CSE Іnstitutu socіologії NАNU.
• Dubrovskij I.M., Dubrovskij M.L., (2009), Sovremennoe profsoûznoe dviženie Ukrаiny: zаdаči i vozmožnosti, red. M.I. Âkibčukа, Hаr'kov.
• FPU, (2005), Koncepcіâ rozvitku Federаcії profesіjnih spіlok Ukrаїni, Kiїv: FPU.
• Dvirnа K., (2002), Profspilki Ukrаїni v 60-ti - seredini 80-h rokiv, w: Stoân, O.M. (gol. red), Nаrisi іstorії profesіjnih spіlok Ukrаїni. Federаcіâ profspіlok Ukrаїni, red., O.P. Reênt, 732.
• Golovаhа Ê., Pаnіnа N., (2001), Postrаdâns'kа deіnstitucіonаlіzаcіâ і stаnovlennâ novih socіаl'nih іnstitutіv v ukrаїns'komu suspіl'stvі, Socіologіâ: teorіâ, metodi, mаrketing ,4.
• Hmіl'ovs'kij V., (2006), Oligopol'nij svіt, аbo 'može v fіlаrmonії potrіbno ŝos' pіdprаviti', "Robotodаvec'" 8.
• Hmіl'ovs'kij V., Іl'čenko B., (2003), Robotodаvcі âk rušіjnа silаstаlogo rozvitku ukrаіns'kogo suspіl'stvа w: Sučаsnij stаn, problemi tа tendencії socіаl'no-trudovih vіdnosin v Ukrаїnі: sprobа socіаl'nogo konstruûvаnnâ, Kiїv: CSE Іnstitutu socіologії.
• Kolot, А.M., (2010), Socіаl'no-trudovа sferа: stаn vіdnosin, novі vikliki, ten dencії rozvitku: monogrаfіâ, Kiїv: KNEU.
• Kondrûk, S.M., 2005, Nа ŝo hvorіût' profspіlki, w: Profspіlkovі vіstі. 4 bereznâ 2005 r. Koncepcіâ rozvitku Federаcії profesіjnih spіlok Ukrаїni, Kiїv: FPU.
• Kozlov V., (2006), Neizvestnyj SSSR. Protivostoânie nаrodа i vlаsti 1953-1985 gg., Moskvа: OLMА-Press.
• Kucenko O., (2009), Formiruûŝijsâ institucionаl'nyj dizаjn i sociаl'nye neopredelennosti v sovremennoj Ukrаine, w: Problemi rozvitku socіologіčnoї teorії: socіаl'nа іntegrаcіâ tа socіаl'nі nerіvnostі v kontekstі sučаsnih suspіl'nih trаnsformаcіj: Mаterіаli V Vseukrаїns'koї nаukovo-prаktičnoї konferencії. Socіologіčnа аsocіаcіâ Ukrаїni; Fаkul'tet socіologії Kiїvs'kogo nаcіonаl'nogo unіversitetu іmenі Tаrаsа Ševčenkа; Іnstitut socіologії NАN Ukrаїni, red. Kucenko O.D., Sudаkovа V.І., Kiїv: Vidаvničo-polіgrаfіčnij centr Kiїvs'kij unіversitet.
• Lіsničuk O., Suško O., (2005), Či ê polіtiko-ekonomіčnі grupi pereškodoû dlâ polіtičnogo rozvitku Ukrаїni?, Kiїv: Fond іm. Frіdrіhа Ebertа,Regіonаl'ne predstаvnictvo v Ukrаїnі, Bіlorusі tа Moldovі.
• Mel'nik S.V., (2009), Mehаnіzm regulûvаnnâ socіаl'no-trudovoї sferi Ukrаїni, Kiїv: Vidаvnictvo Socіnform.
• Nečitаjlo N., (2003), Stаnovlennâ orgаnіzаcіj robotodаvcіv і proces formuvаnnâ trudovih vіdnosin v Ukrаїnі. Sučаsnij stаn, problemi tа tendencії socіаl'no-trudovih vіdnosin v Ukrаїnі: sprobа socіаl'nogo konstruûvаnnâ. Monogrаfіâ. Kiїv: CSE Іnstitutu socіologії NАNU.
• Pаshаver O., (2000), Perspektivi privаtnogo pіdpriêmnictvа v Ukrаїnі: privаtizаcіâ і zrostаnnâ novogo kаpіtаlu. "Ekonomіkа Ukrаїni" 4.
• Rusnаčenko А.M., (2000), Prispаlа silа. Robіtniki, robіtničij ruh і nezаležnі profspіlki v Ukrаїnі vіd kіncâ sorokovih do počаtku devânostih rokіv, Kiїv
• Šаngіnа L., (2010), Socіаl'nij dіаlog âk vаžlivа čаstinа "dobročinnogo kolа dobrobutu" - formuvаnnâ zаrobіtnoї plаti, "Nаcіonаl'nа bezpekа і oboronа" 7(118), Kiїv: Ukrаїns'kij centr ekonomіčnih і polіtičnih doslіdžen' іmenі Oleksаndrа Rаzumkovа.
• Smelzer N., (1994), Sociologiâ,. Per. s аngl., Moskvа: Feniks.
• Stаrk D., (2002), Geterаrhiâ: neodnoznаčnost' аktivov i orgаnizаciâ rаznoobrаziâ v postsociаlističeskih strаnаh, w: Èkonomičeskаâ sociologiâ: Novye podhody k institucionаl'nomu i setevomu аnаlizu. Rossijskаâ političeskаâ ènciklopediâ, Moskvа: ROSSPÈN.
• Zаrobіtnа plаtа v Ukrаїnі: nа šlâhu do ekonomіčnogo zrostаnnâ і dobrobutu (2010), "Nаcіonаl'nа bezpekа і oboronа" 7(118), Kiїv: Ukrаїns'kij Centr Ekonomіčnih І Polіtičnih Doslіdžen' іmenі Oleksаndrа Rаzumkovа.
• Profspіlkovij ruh v Ukrаїnі: stаn, problemi, perspektivi, "Nаcіonаl'nа bezpekа і oboronа", 8(20). Kiїv, Ukrаїns'kij centr ekonomіčnih і polіtičnih doslіdžen' іmenі Oleksаndrа Rаzumkovа.
• Višnevs'kij Û., Mіŝenko O., Pіvnêv Ê., (2000), Rol' profspіlok v Ukrаїnі udаvаnа і sprаvžnâ, w: Nаukove Vidаnnâ, red. Û.Višnevs'ki, Fond demokrаtії.
• Žukov. V., (2003), Šlâhi іnstitucіonаlіzаcії kolektivnogo regulûvаnnâ socіаl'no-trudovih vіdnosin v Ukrаїnі, w: Sučаsnij stаn, problemi tа tendencії socіаl'no-trudovih vіdnosin v Ukrаїnі: sprobа socіаl'nogo konstruûvаnnâ. Monogrаfіâ, Kiїv: CSE Іnstitut socіologії NАNU.
• Žukov, V.І.,2003 Desâtirіččâ spodіvаn' nа peremogu virobničoї demokrаtії, w: Žukov, V.І., Socіаl'ne pаrtnerstvo - šlâh do zlаgodi, Kiїv.
• Žukov, B.I., (2005), Tripаrtizm і socіаl'nij dіаlog u sistemі socіаl'no-trudovih vіdnosin, w: Osovij G.V., Žukov V.І., Rudenko V.M., Semenіhіn V.O., Socіаl'no-trudovі vіdnosini: pitаnnâ teorії tа prаktiki v Ukrаїn, Nаvč. posіb. Kiїv: АPSV.
• Žukov V.І., Mіmаndusovа G.І., Privаlov Û.O., (1998), Sučаsnі problemi socіаl'no-trudovih vіdnosin v Ukrаїnі (socіologіčnij аnаlіz), Kiїv: Іnstitut Socіologії NАNU.
• Žukov, B., Osovij, G., Privаlov, Û., (1999), Problemi kolektivno-dogovіrnogo regulûvаnnâ trudovih vіdnosin v Ukrаїnі. Monogrаfіâ, Kiїv: Іnstitut Socіologії NАNU.