Koncepcje wiedzy i zarządzania wiedzą w organizacji - dyfuzja wiedzy w Microsoft

• Autorzy: Izabela Sztangret

Warianty tytułu

Knowledge and Knowledge Management Concept in the Organization - Knowledge Diffusion in Microsoft

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

Artykuł stanowi identyfikację i charakterystykę pojęć oraz koncepcji wiedzy i zarządzania wiedzą. Kategorie te, przedstawiono w ujęciu szkoły japońskiej, w podejściu procesowym i zasobowym. Zgodnie z modelem SECI, autorstwa I. Nonaka, zarządzanie wiedzą zdefiniowano przez pryzmat powtarzającego się cyklu czterech procesów: socjalizacji, eksternalizacji, kombinacji i internalizacji. Przytoczono definicje zarządzania wiedzą, ukazujące etapy procesu i jego cele. Szczególną uwagę zwrócono na generowanie innowacyjnej wiedzy przez jej kombinację. Wiedzę scharakteryzowano przez pryzmat jej unikatowości, jako zasobu i wagi dla osiągania pozycji konkurencyjnej, przede wszystkim dzięki efektom synergii, uzyskiwanym przez przedsiębiorstwa sieciowe. Ostatnia część artykułu, dotyczy dyfuzji wiedzy w subsieci tworzenia produktów komputerowych, na przykładzie wspólnoty wiedzy Microsoft. (abstrakt oryginalny)

EN

The article is the identification and characterization of the terms and concepts of knowledge and knowledge management. These categories are presented in terms of the Japanese school, the process and assets treatment. According to the SECI model, by I. Nonaka, knowledge management is defined through the prism of a repeating cycle of four processes: socialization, externalization, combination and internalization. Quoted knowledge management definition has been showing the stages of the process and its goals. Particular attention was paid to the generation of innovative knowledge through its combination. Knowledge is characterized by the prism of its uniqueness and importance as a resource for achieving competitive position, primarily due to synergy effects, obtained by the network companies. The last part of the article relates to the diffusion of knowledge in the net-creation of computer products, in the case of Microsoft Knowledge Communities. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Wiedza; Zarządzanie wiedzą; Dyfuzja wiedzy; Technologia informacyjna

EN

Knowledge; Knowledge management; Knowledge diffussion; Information Technology (IT)

• Czasopismo: Zarządzanie i Finanse
• Rocznik: 2013
• Numer: R. 11, nr 1, cz. 4
• Strony: 509--525

Twórcy

autor

Izabela Sztangret

• Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach

Bibliografia

• Alavi M., Leidner D. E. (2001), Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues, "MIS Quarterly".
• Argote L., Ingram P. (2000), Knowledge transfer: A Basis for Competitive Advantage in Firms, "Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes", 82.
• Arystoteles (1983), Metafizyka, PWN, Warszawa.
• Barney J. (1991), Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, "J. Management", 77 (1).
• Blackler F. (1995), Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organizations: An Overview and Interpretation, "Organization Studies".
• Błaszczuk A., Brdulak J. J., Guzik M., Pawluczuk A. (2004), Zarządzanie wiedzą w polskich przedsiębiorstwach, SGH, Warszawa.
• Boisot M. H. (1998), Knowledge Assets - Securing Competitive Advantage in the Knowledge Economy, Oxford University Press, New York.
• Bowonder B., Miyake T. (2000), Technology management: A knowledge ecology perspective, "Internat. J. Tech. Management", 19 (7/8).
• Brdulak J. J. (2005), Zarządzanie wiedzą a proces innowacji produktu. Budowanie przewagi konkurencyjnej produktu, SGH, Warszawa.
• Bukowitz W. R., Willson R. L. (2000), Knowledge Management Fieldbook, Pearson Education, London.
• Business Process Reengineering: BreakPoint Strategies for Market Dominance (1993), Johansson H. J. (red.), John Wiley & Sons.
• Chen A. N. K., Edgington T. M. (2005), Assessing value in organizational knowledge creation: Considerations for knowledge workers, MIS Quart, 29 (2).
• Chini T. C. (2004), Effective Knowledge Transfer in Multinational Corporations, Hampshire, Palgrave Macmillan.
• Chou S., He M. (2004), Knowledge management: The distinctive roles of knowledge assets in facilitating knowledge creation, "J. Inform. Sci.", 30 (2).
• Conner K. R., Prahalad C. K. (1996), A resource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism, "Organ. Sci.", 7 (5).
• Davenport T. (1993), Process Innovation: Reengineering work through information technology, "Harvard Business School Press", Boston.
• Domański J. (1984), Platon Witwickiego, Studia Filozoficzne.
• Encyklopedia Powszechna (1973-76), Bonecki H. (red.), PWN, Warszawa.
• Foss N. J. (1996), Knowledge-based approaches to the theory of the firm: Some critical comments, "Organ. Sci.", 7 (5).
• Foss N. J., Pedersen T. (2004), Organizing Knowledge Processes in the Multinational Corporation: An Introduction, "Journal of International Business Studies", 35.
• Goerl G. F. (1975), Cybernetics, professionalizations and knowledge management: an exercise in assumptive theory, "Public Administration Review", 35.
• Goffin K., Koners U. (2011), Tacit Knowledge, Lessons Learnt and New Product Development, "Journal Product Innovation Management".
• Grudzewski W. M., Hejduk I. K. (2004), Zarządzanie wiedzą w przedsiębiorstwie, Difin, Warszawa.
• Gupta A. K., Govindarajan V. (2000), Knowledge management's social dimension: Lessons from Nucor steel, "Sloan Management Review", 42 (1).
• Haas M. R., Hansen M. T. (2007), Different Knowledge, Different benefits: Toward a Productivity Perspective on Knowledge Sharing in Organization, "Strategic Management Journal".
• Hammer M., Champy J. (1993), Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution, Harper Business.
• Hansen M. T., Nohria N., Tierney T. (1999), What's Your Strategy for Managing Knowledge?, "Harvard Business Review".
• Hayes M., Walsham G. (2003), Knowledge sharing and ICTs: A relational perspective, w: Easterby-Smith M., Lyles M. A. (2003), The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge, Blackwell, Oxford.
• Henry N. (1975), Bureaucracy, technology, and knowledge management, "Public Administration Review", 35.
• Hildreth P. M., Kimble C. (2002), The duality of knowledge, "Information Research", 8 (1).
• Kogut B., Zander U. (1992), Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology, "Organ. Sci.", 3 (3).
• Kotabe M., Dunlap-Hinkler D., Parente R., Mishra H. A. (2007), Determinant of Cross-National Knowledge Transfer and Its Effect on Firm Innovation, "Journal of International Business Studies", 38 (2).
• Krogh G., Roos J., Slocum K. (1994), An essay on corporate epistemology, "Strategic Management J.", 15.
• McCaffery J. (1975), Knowledge management in fiscal policy formation, "Public Administration Review", 35.
• Mikuła B. (2001), W kierunku organizacji inteligentnych, Antykwa, Kraków.
• Morey D., Maybury M., Thuraisingham B. (2002), Knowledge Management: Classic and Contemporary Works, MIT Press.
• Nonaka I. (1987), Managing the firm as information creation process, Institute of Business Research, Hitotsubashi University, Hitotsubashi.
• Nonaka I. (1991), The knowledge-creating company, "Harvard Business Review", 69 (6).
• Nonaka I. (1994), A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation, "Organization Science", 5 (1).
• Nonaka I., Byosiere P., Borucki C. C., Konno N. (1994), Organizational knowledge creation theory: A first comprehensive test, "International Business Review", 8.
• Nonaka I., Krogh G. (2009), Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Conversion: Controversy and Advancement in Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory, "Organization Science".
• Nonaka I., Krogh G., Voelpel S. (2006), Organizational knowledge creation theory: Evolutionary paths and future advances, "Organ. Stud.", 27 (8).
• Nonaka I., Takeuchi H. (1986), The New New Product Development Game, "Harvard Business Review".
• Nonaka I., Takeuchi H. (1995), The knowledge creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamic of innovation, Oxford University Press, New York.
• Nonaka I., Toyama R., Nagata A. (2000), A firm as a knowledge creating entity: A new perspective on the theory of the firm, "Indust. Corporate Change", 9 (1).
• Polanyi M. (1958), Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
• Polanyi M. (1966), The Tacit Dimension, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
• Reed R., DeFillippi R. J. (1990), Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation and sustainable competitive advantage, "Academy Management Re-view", 15 (1).
• Ribeiro R., Collins H. (2007), The bread-making machine: Tacit knowledge and two types of action, "Organ. Stud.", 28 (9).
• Rishe N. D., Athauda R. I., Yuan J., Shu-Ching Chen (2012), Knowledge Management for Database Interoperability, High-Performance Database Research Center, Florida International University Miami.
• Rummler G., Brache A. (1995), Improving Performance: How to manage the white space on the organizational chart, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
• Sarvary M. (1999), Knowledge Management and Competition in the Consulting Industry, California Management Review, Vol. 41 (2).
• Schmidt F. L., Hunter J. E. (1993), Tacit knowledge, practical intelligence, general mental ability, and job knowledge, "Current Directions in Psychological Science".
• Schwaber K. (2004), Agile Project Management with Scrum, "Microsoft Press".
• Skyrme D. J. (1999), Knowledge Networking. Creating the Collaborative Enterprise, Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford.
• Snowden D. (2002), Complex Acts of Knowing - Paradox and Descriptive Self Awareness, "Journal of Knowledge Management", Special Issue, 6.
• Spender J. C., Grant R. M. (1996), Knowledge and the firm: Overview, "Strategic Management J.", 17.
• Spender J. C. (1996), Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm, "Strategic Management J.", 17.
• Sunassee N. N., Sewry D. A. (2002), A Theoretical Framework for Knowledge Management Implementation, ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Port Elizabeth, South Africa.
• Sutherland J. V., Schwaber K. (1995), Business object design and implementation: OOPSLA'95 workshop proceedings, "The University of Michigan".
• Szulanski G. (1996), Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm, "Strategic Management J.", 17.
• Teece D. J. (2000), Managing Intellectual Capital - Organizational, Strategic and Policy Dimensions, Oxford University Press, New York.
• Teece D. J. (1998), Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets, "California Management Review", 40 (3).
• Teece D. J., Pisano G., Shuen A. (1997), Dynamic capabilities and strategic management, "Strategic Management J.", 18 (7).
• Tiwana A. (2003), Przewodnik po zarządzaniu wiedzą. E-biznes i zastosowania CRM, Placet, Warszawa.
• Tsoukas H. (1996), The firm as a distributed knowledge system: A constructionist approach, "Strategic Management J.", 17.
• Tsoukas H. (2003), Do we really understand tacit knowledge?, w: Easterby-Smith M., Lyles M. (2003), The Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management, Blackwell, Oxford.
• Wachowiak P. (2005), Pomiar kapitału intelektualnego przedsiębiorstwa, SGH, Warszawa.
• Winter S. (1987), Knowledge and competence as strategic assets, w: Teece D. (1987), The Competitive Challenge-Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA.
• Witwicki W. (1936), Platona Teajtet, Warszawa.
• Żabiński L. (2007), Koncepcje marketingu a praktyki zarządzania. Istota, sposoby identyfikacji, systematyka, w: Zarządzanie Marketingowe. Koncepcje marketingu a praktyki zarządzania. Aspekty teoretyczne i badawcze, Żabińska T., Żabiński L. (red.), AE, Katowice.