Neoliberalizm nieograniczający i ekonomia społeczna

• Autorzy: Peter Graefe
• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

Niniejszy artykuł stanowi głos w debacie na temat nowych kierunków polityki społecznej i próbę powiązania ich z wcześniejszym okresem. W szczególności, wykorzystując rozróżnienie między neoliberalizmem ograniczającym i nieograniczającym, nawiązuje do szerszego, nierównomiernego procesu neoliberalizacji, który obejmuje budowanie nowych instytucji i rozwiązania w dziedzinie rządomyślności, mające na celu likwidację niedomagań oraz defektów wcześniejszych faz neoliberalizmu. Uznając zasadność krytyki kierowanej pod adresem zbyt wysokiego poziomu abstrakcji dotychczasowych rozważań opartych na tym podejściu, jak i niedostatecznego zastosowania go w badaniach empirycznych, podjąłem próbę analizy jednego obszaru polityki, a mianowicie ekonomii społecznej na jednym obszarze jurysdykcji politycznej, czyli w kanadyjskiej prowincji Québec. (fragment tekstu)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Polityka społeczna państwa; Neoliberalizm; Ekonomia społeczna; Rozwój przedsiębiorczości; Opieka nad dzieckiem

EN

State social policy; Neoliberalism; Social economy; Entrepreneurship development; Childcare

• Czasopismo: Ekonomia Społeczna
• Rocznik: 2012
• Numer: nr 1
• Strony: 101--115

Twórcy

autor

Peter Graefe

• Uniwersytet McMaster, Kanada

Bibliografia

• Acker J. [2004], Gender, Capitalism and Globalization, "Critical Sociology", Vol. 30, No. 1.
• Albo G. [2004], Contesting the 'New Capitalism', Department of Political Science, York University (mimeo).
• Albo G., Fast T. [2003], Varieties of Neoliberalism: Trajectories of Workfare in the Advanced Capitalist Countries, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association, Halifax.
• Amin A., Cameron A., Hudson R. [1999], Welfare as Work? The Potential of the UK Social Economy, "Environment and Planning A", Vol. 31, No. 11.
• Amin A., Cameron A., Hudson R. [2002], Placing the Social Economy, Routledge, London.
• Ascoli U., Ranci C. [2002], Changes in the Welfare Mix: The European Path, [w:] U. Ascoli, C. Ranci (red.), Dilemmas of the Welfare Mix: The New Structure of Welfare in an Era of Privatization, Kluwer Academic, New York.
• Association [1998], Who Will Be Responsible for Providing Care? The Impact of the Shift to Ambulatory Care and of Social Economy Policies on Quebec Women, Status of Women Canada, Association feminine d'education et d'action sociale, Ottawa.
• Baines D. [2004], Pro-market, Non-market: The Dual Nature of Organizational Change in Social Service Delivery, "Critical Social Policy",Vol. 24, No. 1.
• Bernier N. F. [2003], How Health Care Reform Impacts Social Policy and Social Redistribution, "Canadian Review of Social Policy", No. 53.
• Borzaga C., Santuari A. [2003], New Trends in the Non-profit Sector in Europe: The Emergence of Social Entrepreneurship, [w:] The Non-profit Sector in a Changing Economy, OECD, Paris.
• Bucek J., Smith B. [2000], New Approaches to Local Democracy: Direct Democracy, Participation and the "Third Sector", "Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy", Vol. 18, No. 1.
• Carroll W. K., Carson C. [2003], Forging a New Hegemony? The Role of Transnational Policy Groups in the Network and Discourses of Global Corporate Governance, "Journal of World-Systems Research", Vol. 9, No. 1.
• Chagnon J. [2004], Portrait 2003 des enterprises en aide domestique, Ministere du Developpement economique et regional et de la Recherche, Quebec.
• Comeau Y. i in. [2003], L'economie sociale et le Sommet socioeconomique de 1996: Le bilan des acteurs sur le terrain, "Nouvelles pratiques socials", Vol. 15, No. 2.
• Comeau Y., Favreau L., Levesque B., Mendell M. [2001], Emploi, economie sociale, developpement local: Les nouvelles fi lieres, Presses de l'Universite du Quebec, Sainte-Foy.
• Craig G., Taylor M. [2002], Dangerous Liaisons: Local Government and the Voluntary and Community Sectors, [w:] C. Glendinning, M. Powell, K. Rummery (red.), Partnership, New Labour and the Governance of Welfare, Polity Press, Bristol.
• D'Amours M. [2001], Economie sociale au Quebec: Vers un clivage entre entreprise collective et action communautaire, Projet de cooperation France-Quebec en economie sociale et solidaire, May (www.unites.uqam.ca/econos/Chercheurs- D'Amours.pdf ).
• Daly M., Yeates N. [2002], Common Origins, Different Paths: Adaptation and Change in Social Security in Britain and Ireland, "Policy & Politics", Vol. 31, No. 1.
• Eisenschitz A., Gough J. [1996], The Contradictions of Neo- Keynesian Local Economic Strategy, "Review of International Political Economy", Vol. 3, No. 3.
• Esping-Andersen G. [2002], Towards the Good Society, Once Again?, [w:] Why We Need a New Welfare State, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
• European Commission [1998], The Era of Tailor-made Jobs: Second Report on Local Development and Employment Initiatives, European Commission, Brussels.
• Evers A., Laville J.-L. [2004], Social Services by Social Enterprises: On the Possible Constribution of Hybrid Organizations and a Civil Society, [w:] A. Evers, J.-L. Laville (red.) The Third Sector in Europe, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
• Gough J. [2004], Changing Scale as Changing Class Relations: Variety and Contradiction in the Politics of Scale, "Political Geography", Vol. 23, No. 2.
• Groupe [1996], Groupe de travail sur l'economie sociale, Osons la solidarite, October.
• Hudson R. [2002], New Geographies and Forms of Work and Unemployment and Public Policy Innovation in Europe, "Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografi e", Vol. 93, No. 3.
• Jenson J. [2002], Against the Current: Child Care and Family Policy in Quebec, [w:] S. Michel, R. Mahon (red.) Child Care Policy at the Crossroads: Gender and Welfare State Restructuring, Routledge, New York.
• Jenson J., Saint-Martin D. [2003], New Routes to Social Cohesion? Citizenship and the Social Investment State, "Canadian Journal of Sociology", Vol. 28, No. 1.
• Jessop B. [2002], Liberalism, Neoliberalism, and Urban Governance: A State-Theoretical Perspective, "Antipode", Vol. 34, No. 3.
• Larner W. [2000], Neo-liberalism: Policy, Ideology, Governmentality, "Studies in Political Economy", No. 63.
• Laville J.-L. [2003], A New European Socioeconomic Perspective, "Review of Social Economy", Vol. 61, No. 3.
• Levesque B., Malo M.-C., Tremblay D. [2001], Partenariat economie sociale et economie publique, "Economie et solidarities", Vol. 32, No. 1-2.
• McDonald C., Marston G. [2002], Patterns of Governance: The Curious Case of Non-profit Community Services in Australia, "Social Policy and Administration", Vol. 36, No. 4.
• Ministere [1998], Quebec objectif emploi: Vers une economie d'avant-garde: Une strategie de developpement economique creatrice d'emplois.
• Ministere des Finances [2003], Vers le plein emploi - Volet economie sociale, Ministere des Finances, Quebec.
• Ministere du Developpement [2005], Plan strategique 2005-2008, MDEIE, Quebec.
• Murphy C. N. [1999], Inequality, Turmoil and Democracy: Global Political-Economic Visions at the End of the Century, "New Political Economy", Vol. 4, No. 2.
• McMurtry J. J. [2004], Social Economy as Political Practice, "International Journal of Social Economics", Vol. 31, No. 9.
• OECD [1998], Fostering Entrepreneurship, OECD, Paris.
• OECD [1999], Social Enterprises, OECD, Paris.
• Peck J. [2002], Political Economies of Scale: Fast Policy, Interscalar Relations and Neoliberal Workfare, "Economic Geography", Vol. 78, No. 3.
• Peck J. [2004], Geography and Public Policy: Constructions of Neoliberalism, "Progress in Human Geography", Vol. 28, No. 3.
• Peck J., Tickell A. [2002], Neoliberalizing Space, "Antipode", Vol. 34, No. 3.
• Regroupement [1998], Leur equilibre, notre desequilibre, RIOCM, Regroupement intersectoriel des organismes communautaires de Montreal, Montreal.
• Rene J.-F. i in. [2001], Les organisms communautaires au Quebec: Des pratiques a la croisee des chemins, Relais-femmes, Montreal.
• Saint-Martin D. [2001], De l'etat-providence a l'etat d'investissement social: un nouveau paradigme pour enfant-er l'economie du savoir?, [w:] L. Pal (red.) How Ottawa Spends 2000-2001, Oxford University Press, Toronto.
• Shragge E. [1999], Looking Backwards to Go Forward: The Quebec Community Movement 30 Years Later, "Intervention", No. 110.
• Taylor M. [2003], Public Policy in the Community, Palgrave MacMillan, New York.
• Tickell A., Peck J. [2003], Making Global Rules: Globalization or Neoliberalization?, [w:] J. Peck, H. Wai-chung Yeung (red.) Remaking the Global Economy: Economic-Geographic Perspectives, Sage, London.
• Torfing J. [1999], Towards a Schumpeterian Workfare Postnational Regime: Path-Shaping and Path-Dependency in Danish Welfare State Reform, "Economy and Society", Vol. 28, No. 3.
• Uitermark J. [2005], The Genesis and Evolution of Urban Policy: A Confrontation of Regulationist and Governmentality Approaches, "Political Geography", Vol. 24, No. 2.
• White D. [2001], Formalizing Relations Between States and Voluntary Sectors: A Comparison of National Partnership Agreements, Paper presented at the RC19 meeting of the ISA, Oviedo, Spain, September.
• White D. [2004], The Voluntary Sector, Community Sector and Social Economy in Canada: Why One is not the Other, [w:] A. Zimmer, Ch. Stecker (red.) Strategy Mix for Nonprofit Organisations: Vehicles for Social and Labour Market Integrations, Kluwer Academic, New York.