Analiza relacji między regułami i procesami biznesowymi

• Autorzy: Wojciech Fliegner

Warianty tytułu

Analysis of Relationship Between Rules and Business Processes

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

Celem artykułu jest rozpoznanie związków między regułami, modelami procesów i procesami biznesowymi. Działanie to ma poprzedzać próbę opracowania taksonomii reguł i modeli procesów biznesowych, która będzie przedmiotem kolejnego artykułu. W pierwszej części artykułu definiowane są relacje między tymi kategoriami pojęciowymi, część druga zaś jest przeglądem badań dotyczących różnych aspektów tych relacji w kontekście ich modelowania.(abstrakt oryginalny)

EN

Before we create a common taxonomy of business rules and business process models, it is necessary to understand the relationship between rules, process models, and processes. This paper contains two main parts. Section 2 defines the relationship between rules, processes, and process models (the relationship between process models and processes is clear, so we omit it). Section 3 reviews some existing research on various facets of that relationship.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Procesy biznesowe; Modelowanie procesów biznesowych

EN

Business processes; Business Process Modeling

• Czasopismo: Nauki o Zarządzaniu / Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny we Wrocławiu
• Rocznik: 2013
• Numer: nr 4 (17)
• Strony: 18--28

Twórcy

autor

Wojciech Fliegner

• Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu

Bibliografia

• Bajec M., Krisper M., A methodology and tool support for managing business rules in organizations, "Information Systems" 2005, vol. 30, 6, s. 423-443.
• Bry F. i in., Realizing Business Processes with ECA Rules: Benefits, Challenges, Limits, [w:] J. Alferes, J. Bailey, W. May, U. Schwertel (red.), "4th International Workshop on Principles and Practice of Semantic Web Reasoning (PPSWR 2006)", Budva 2006, Springer-Verlag, LNCS 4187, 2006, s. 48-62.
• Di Valentin C., Burkhart T., Vanderhaeghen D., Werth D., Loos P., Towards a Framework for Transforming Business Models into Business Processes, AMCIS 2012 Proceedings, Paper 10, 2012, http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2012/proceedings/EnterpriseSystems/10.
• Faget J. i in., Business Processes and Business Rules: Business Agility Becomes Real, Workflow Handbook 2003, Future Strategies Inc., 2003, s. 77-92.
• Feldkamp D., Hinkelmann K., Thönssen B., KISS - Knowledge-Intensive Service Support: An Approach for Agile Process Management, [w:] A. Paschke, Y. Biletskiy (red.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Advances in Rule Interchange and Applications (RuleML2007), Springer-Verlag, Orlando 2007, LNCS 4824, 2007, s. 25-38.
• Gasevic D., Guizzardi G., Taveter K., Wagner G., Vocabularies, ontologies, and rules for enterprise and business process modeling and management, "Information Systems", vol. 35, Issue 4, June 2010, s. 375-378.
• Goedertier S., Vanthienen J., Declarative process modeling with business vocabulary and business rules, "EIS 2008 Proceedings", Paper 6, 2008, http://aisel.aisnet.org/eis2008/6.
• Goedertier S., Vanthienen J., Business Rules for Compliant Business Process Models, [w:] G. Regev, P. Soffer, R. Schmidt (red.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Business Information Systems (BIS 2006), Springer-Verlag, LNI 65, 2006, s. 558-572.
• Graml T., Bracht R., Spies M., Patterns of business rules to enable agile business processes, "Enter- prise Information Systems", vol. 2, Issue 4, 2008, s. 385-402.
• Green P., Rosemann M., Integrated process modeling: an ontological valuation, "Information Systems" 2000, vol. 25, 2, s. 73-87.
• Green P. i in., Improving Representational Analysis: An Example from the Enterprise Systems Interoperability Domain, [w:] S. Spencer, A. Jenkins (red.), 17th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, December 6-8, 2006, Adelaide, Australia.
• Herbst H., Business rules in systems analysis: a meta-model and repository system, "Information Systems" 1996, vol. 21, 2, s. 147-166.
• Kappel G., Rausch-Schott S., Retschitzegger W., Coordination in Workflow Management Systems - A Rule-Based Approach, [w:] W. Conen, G. Neumann (red.), Coordination Technology for Collaborative Applications - Organizations, Processes, and Agents, Springer-Verlag, LNCS 1364, 1998, s. 99-120.
• Knolmayer G., Endl R., Pfahrer M., Modeling Processes and Workflows by Business Rules, [w:] W. van der Aalst, J. Desel, A. Oberweis (red.), Business Process Management. Models, Techniques, and Empirical Studies, Springer-Verlag, LNCS 1806, 2000, s. 16-29.
• Kovacic A., Business renovation: business rules (still) the missing link, "Business Process Management Journal" 2004, vol. 10, 2, s. 158-170.
• Lang P., Obermair W., Schrefl M., Modeling Business Rules with Situation/Activation Diagrams, [w:] W. Gray, P.-A. Larson (red.), Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE 1997), Birmingham 1997, s. 455-464, http://www.computer.org/csdl/procee- dings/icde/1997/.
• Lee S. i in., Composition of executable business process models by combining business rules and process flows, "Expert Systems with Applications", vol. 33, Issue 1, July 2007, s. 221-229.
• Lu R., Sadiq S., A Survey of Comparative Business Process Modeling Approaches, [w:] Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Business Information Systems (BIS 2007), Springer-Verlag, LNCS 4439, 2007, s. 82-94.
• McBrien P., Seltveit A., Coupling Process Models and Business Rules, [w:] A. Sölvberg, J. Krogstie, A. Seltveit (red.), Information Systems Development for Decentralized Organizations, Proceedings of the IFIP 8.1 WG Conference, New York 1995, s. 201-217.
• Milosevic Z., Towards Integrating Business Policies with Business Processes, [w:] W. van der Aalst, B. Benatallah, F. Casati, F. Curbera (red.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Business Process Management (BPM 2005), Springer-Verlag, LNCS 3649, 2005, s. 404-409.
• Moore A., Beck M., Modeling the Business: Improving Process Models through Business Rules, [w:] B. von Halle, L. Goldberg, J. Zachman (red.), The Business Rule Revolution. Running Business the Right Way, Happy About, 2006, s. 89-105.
• OMG, Business Motivation Model (BMM), OMG, 2007a.
• OMG, Business Process Definition MetaModel (BPDM), v1.0, OMG, 2008a, http:// www.omg.org/spec/BPDM/1.0/.
• OMG, Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN), v1.1, OMG, 2007b.
• OMG, Semantics of Business Vocabulary and Business Rules (SBVR), v1.0, OMG, 2008b.
• Raj A., Prabhakar T., Hendryx S., Transformation of SBVR Business Design to UML Models, [w:] Proceedings of the 1st India Software Engineering Conference (ISEC 2008), Hyderabad 2008, s. 29-38, http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1342221.
• Recker J., BPMN modeling - who, where, how and why, "Business Process Trends", May 2008.
• Recker J., Indulska M., Green P., Extending Representational Analysis: BPMN User and Developer Perspectives, [w:] G. Alonso, P. Dadam, M. Rosemann (red.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Business Process Management (BPM 2007), Springer-Verlag, Brisbane 2007, LNCS 4714, 2007, s. 384-399.
• Reusch P.J.A., Bozguney E., Gdaniec J., Reusch P., New Perspectives for the Management of Business Rules based upon Decision Tables, [w:] IEEE International Workshop on Intelligent Data Acquisition and Advanced Computing Systems, 2007, s. 475-479, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber =04488464.
• Rosemann M. i in., A Study of the Evolution of the Representational Capabilities of Process Modeling Grammars, [w:] E. Dubois, K. Pohl (red.), Advanced Information Systems Engineering - CAiSE 2006, Springer-Verlag, LNCS 4001, 2006, s. 447-461.
• Royce G., Integration of a Business Rules Engine to Manage Frequently Changing Workflow: A Case Study of Insurance Underwriting Workflow, [w:] Proceedings of the 13th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2007), Keystone 2007, s. 1-9, http://www.sigpam.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/royce.pdf.
• Steinke G., Nikolette C., Business rules as the basis of an organization's information systems, "Industrial Management and Data Systems" 2003, no. 103/1, s. 52-63.
• Taylor J., Raden N., Smart (enough) Systems: How to Deliver Competitive Advantage by Automating Hidden Decisions, Prentice Hall, New York 2007.
• Terminology and Glossary, 3rd Edition, Document Number WFMC-TC-1011, Workflow Management Coalition, Winchester 1999.
• Von Halle B., Business Rules Applied: Building Better Systems Using the Business Rules Approach, Wiley, New York 2001.
• Wohed i in., On the Suitability of BPMN for Business Process Modelling, [w:] S. Dustdar, J. Fiadeiro, A. Sheth, Proceedings 4th International Conference on Business Process Management (BPM 2006), Springer-Verlag, Vienna 2006, LNCS 4102, s. 161-176.
• Zeng L., Flaxer D., Chang H., Jeng J., Dynamic Business Process Composition and Execution by Rule Inference, [w:] A. Buchmann, F. Casati, L. Fiege, M. Hsu, M. Shan (red.), Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Technologies for E-Services (TES 2002), Springer-Verlag, Hongkong 2002, LNCS 2444, s. 141-150.
• Zur Muehlen M., Indulska M., Modeling languages for business processes and business rules: A representational analysis, "Information Systems", vol. 35, Issue 4, June 2010, s. 379-390.