Current Trends in the Entrepreneurial Sector in Emerging Territorial Systems

• Autorzy: Florentina-Cristina Merciu , Andreea-Loreta Cercleux , Ancuţa Muşat
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The purpose of the present paper is an analysis of the complex economic processes within emerging territorial systems. In a short time span, economic enterprises concentrated inside these urban clusters registered a spectacular evolution compared to the surrounding areas. The intensification of the relations between regional and local development hubs and the space that they polarize led to the individualization of territorial systems apart, with spectacular dynamics of the economic-social processes, which make those systems the most dynamic territorial structures. The study sets out to identify the causes determining these complex processes inside the emerging territorial systems, the manner of functional structuring of the space, as well as the causes that determine the evolution of the economic processes inside emerging systems. Research was conducted upon a relevant emerging territorial system, at the level of NACE (Classification of Activities in the National Economy) codes. For each NACE code, an analysis was conducted of the following indicators: the number of companies, the number of employees, turnover and profit. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Entrepreneurship; Economic process; Enterprise environment; Regional development; Investing attractiveness

PL

Przedsiębiorczość; Procesy gospodarcze; Otoczenie przedsiębiorstwa; Rozwój regionalny; Atrakcyjność inwestycyjna

• Czasopismo: Journal of International Studies
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: 6
• Numer: nr 1
• Strony: 38--50

Twórcy

autor

Florentina-Cristina Merciu

• University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania

autor

Andreea-Loreta Cercleux

• University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania

autor

Ancuţa Muşat

• University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania

Bibliografia

• Abler, R. (1970), What Makes Cities Important, Bell Telephone Magazine.
• Ardagna, S., Lusardi, A. (2010), Heterogeneity in the eff ect of regulation on entrepreneurship and entry size, Journal of the European Economic Association, 8 (2-3), p.594-605.
• Audretsch, D.B., Keilbach, M. (2004), Entrepreneurship capital and economic performance, Regional Studies, 38 (8), p.949-959.
• Bassand, M. (2004), La métropolisation de la Suisse. Lausanne, Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes.
• Bourdeau-Lepage, L., Huriot, J.-M. (2003), Metropolises and Global Coordination. A Historical perspective, AFSE Congress 2003, Paris.
• Braghină, C., Peptenatu, D., Constantinescu, Şt., Pintilii, R.D., Drăghici, C. (2010), Th e pressure exerted on the natural environment in the open pit exploitation areas in Oltenia, Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences, 5(1), p.33-40.
• Braghină. C., Peptenatu, D., Drăghici, C., Pintilii, R.D., Schvab, A. (2011), Territorial management within the systems aff ected by mining.Case study the South-Western Development Region in Romania, Iran. J. Environ. Health. Sci. Eng., 8 (4), p. 342-352.
• Brenner, N. (2003), Metropolitan Institutional Reform and the Rescaling of State Space in Contemporary Western Europe, European Urban and Regional Studies, 10(4), p. 297-324.
• Brenner, N. (2004), Urban governance and the production of new state spaces in Western Europe, 1960-2000, Review of International Political Economy, 11, p.447-488.
• Burinskienė, M.; Rudzkienė, V. (2009), Future insights, scenarios and expert method application in sustainable territorial planning, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 15(1), p. 10-25.
• Casson, M. (1982), Th e entrepreneur, Towata, NJ: Barnes & Noble Books (translated by Pierre Jeanblanc, L'entrepreneur, Economica, 1991).
• Cepoiu, A. L., (2009), Th e role of industrial activities in developing the settlements in the Metropolitan Area of Bucharest, Bucharest: Universitara Press [in Romanian, conclusions in English].
• Chiappori, P.-A., Paiella, M. (2011), Relative risk aversion is constant: evidence from panel data, Journal of the European Economic Association, 9, p. 1021-1052.
• Djankov, S., Miguel, E., Qian, Y., Roland, G. and Zhuravskaya, E. (2005), Who are Russia's entrepreneurs?, Journal of the European Economic Association, 3, p.587-597.
• Fischer, E.M., Reuber, A.R., Dyke, L.S. (1993), A theoretical overview and extension of research on sex, gender and entrepreneurship, Journal of Business Venturing, 8 (2), p.151-168.
• Gartner, W.B. (1993), What are we talking about when we talk about entrepreneurship?, Journal of Business Venturing, 5(1), p. 15-28.
• Guiso, L. and Paiella, M. (2008), Risk aversion, wealth, and background risk, Journal of the European Economic Association, 6, p. 1109-1150.
• Guiso, L. and Schivardi, F. (2011) What determines entrepreneurial clusters?, Journal of the European Economic Association, 9, p. 61-86.
• Gümrükçüoğlu, M. (2011), Urban air pollution monitoring by using geographic information systems: a case study from Sakarya, Turkey, Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences, 6( 2), p. 73-84.
• Herman, E. (2011), Th e Impact of Economic Growth Process on Employment in European Union Countries, Th e Romanian Economic Journal, 42, p. 47-67.
• Humeau, J. B., Peptenatu, D., Pintilii, R., Drăghici, C., Schvab, A. (2010), Th e Role of Polycentric Network in the Demographic Dynamic of Human Settlements, J. of Urban and Regional Analysis, 2 (1), p. 25-37.
• Ianoş, I., Humeau, J.-B., Tălângă, C., Braghină, C., Ancuţa, C., Bogdan L. (2010), Ethics of Space and the Treatment of Most Disadvantaged Areas, Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences, 5(2), p. 211-217.
• Ilieş, A., Dehoorne, O., Ilieş D.C. (2012), Th e cross-border territorial system in Romanian Ukrainian Carpathian area. Elements, mechanisms and structures generating premises for an integrated crossborder territorial system with tourist function, Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences, 7 (1), p. 27-38.
• Koellinger, P., Minniti, M., Schade, C. (2007), I think I can, I think I can: Overconfi dence and entrepreneurial behavior, Journal of Economic Psychology, 28 (4), p. 502-527.
• Krueger, N., Brazeal, D.V. (1994), Entrepreneurial potential and potential entrepreneurs, Entrepreneurship Th eory and Practice, 18 (3), p. 91-104.
• Loo, B. P. Y.; Chow, S. Y. (2006), Sustainable urban transportation: concepts, policies, and methodologies, Journal of Urban Planning and Development-ASCE, 132(2), p. 76-79.
• Lüthje, C., Franke, N. (2003), Th e 'making' of an entrepreneur: testing a model of entrepreneurial intent among engineering students at MIT., R&D Management, 33 (2), p. 135-147.
• Marshall, A. (1890), Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan.
• Muşat A. (2012), Territorial management in disadvantaged areas of South West development management, PhD thesis, manuscript, Bucharest: University of Bucharest.
• Peptenatu, D., Pintilii, R.D., Cepoiu L., Drăghici C., (2009), Polycentric development strategy - an effi cient instrument in administrative decentralization, Romanian Review on Political Geography, 2(2), p. 99-111.
• Peptenatu, D., Pintilii, R.D., Draghici, C., Stoian, D. (2010a), Environmental pollution in functionally restructured urban areas: case study - the city of Bucharest, Iran. J. Environ, Health. Sci. Eng., 7(1), p. 87-96.
• Peptenatu, D., Pintilii R., Peptenatu, A., Draghici, C. (2010 b), Th e role of rural settlements occupying a central position in the elaboration of the strategies of territorial management. Case study the Southwestern Development Region, Romanian Review on Political Geography, 2, p. 411-427.
• Peptenatu, D., Pintilii, R.D., Draghici, C. (2011), Environmental risk management of urban growth poles regarding national importance. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 8(4), p. 737-746.
• Peptenatu, D., Merciu, C., Merciu, G., Drăghici, C., Cercleux. A.L. (2012), Specifi c Features of Environment Risk Management in Emerging Territorial Structures, Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences, 7(2), p. 135-143.
• Reynolds, P.D. (1997), Who starts new fi rms? - Preliminary explorations of fi rms-in-gestation, SmallBusiness Economics, 9 (5), p. 449-462.
• Rhodes, R.A.W. (1997), Understanding Governance. Policy Networks, Governance, Refl exivity and Accountability, Open University Press, Buckingham.
• Richard, J. A. (2004), Natural Inspiration for Self-Adaptive Systems, Database and Expert Systems Applications, 15th International Workshop on (DEXA'04), p. 732-736.
• Schumpeter, J. (1911), Th e Th eory of Economic Development, New Jersey: Harvard University Press.
• Segal, G., Borgia, D., Schoenfeld, J. (2005), Th e motivation to become an entrepreneur, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 11 (1), p. 42-56.
• Shane, S., Venkataraman S. (2000), Th e Promise of entrepreneurship as a fi eld of research, Academy of Management Review, 25 (1), p. 217-226.
• Tabellini, G. (2010), Culture and Institutions: Economic Development in the Regions of Europe, Journal of the European Economic Association, 8, p. 677-716.
• Th ornton, P.H. (1999), Th e sociology of entrepreneurship, Annu. Rev. Sociol., 25, p. 19-46.
• Trón, Z. (2009), Evaluation Methods of European Regional Policy and Reasons for Diff erent Outcomes, Th e Romanian Economic Journal, 32 (2), p.149-185.
• Uygan, D., Cetin O. (2012), Mapping boron pollution using GIS for boron-aff ected soils in Western Turkey, Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences, 7 (1), p. 89-94.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.14254/2071-8330.2013/6-1/3