Labour Flows in the Biotech Sector in Poland

• Autorzy: Piotr Dawidko , Grzegorz Micek
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Based on an analysis of personnel flows (managerial and employee), the authors show that knowledge flows in the biotech sector in Poland are strongly concentrated in space. With respect to managerial intra-metropolitan flows, Warszawa has a similar position to Cracow and the Tri-City (Gdańsk - Gdynia - Sopot conurbation). Cracow is characterised by strong isolation with respect to personnel flows from the outside. On the other hand, within the scope of inter-metropolitan flows, Poland's capital is dominant, in particular in terms of flows to the Tri-city, Poznań and Łódź. In the case of employee flows, the most important features of the examined issue are: dominance of intra-metropolitan flows and strong relationship between flows and the headquarters of the largest biotechnological companies. The conducted studies have shown that in the context of the Polish biotech sector, the concept of "local buzz, global pipelines" is corroborated, in line with which local and global knowledge flows are complementary with respect to each other. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Knowledge transfer; Biotechnology; Workflow management; Knowledge flows

PL

Transfer wiedzy; Biotechnologia; Zarządzanie przepływami pracy; Przepływ wiedzy

• Czasopismo: Prace Geograficzne / Instytut Geografii i Gospodarki Przestrzennej Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
• Rocznik: 2012
• Numer: z. 130
• Strony: 73--89

Twórcy

autor

Piotr Dawidko

• Jagiellonian University in Krakow, Poland

autor

Grzegorz Micek

• Jagiellonian University in Krakow, Poland

Bibliografia

• A framework for biotechnology statistics, 2005, OE CD, Paris.
• Al-Laham A., Tzabbar D., Amburgey T.L., 2011, The Dynamics of Knowledge Stocks and Knowledge Flows: Innovation Consequences of Recruitment and Collaboration in Biotech, Industrial and Corporate Change, 20 (2), 555-583.
• Bagchi-Sen S., Scully J.L., 2004, The Canadian environment for Innovation and Business Development in the Biotechnology Industry: A Firm - Level Analysis, European Planning Studies, 12 (7), 961-983.
• Bathelt H., Malmberg A., Maskell P., 2004, Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation, Progress in Human Geography 28, 31-56.
• Boschma R.A., Ter Wal A.L.J., 2007, Knowledge Networks and Innovative Performance in an Industrial District: The Case of Footwear District in South of Italy, Industry and Innovation, 14 (2), 177-199.
• Boschma R. A., Eriksson R., Lindgren U., 2009, Labour mobility, related variety and the performance of plants. A Swedish study, Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography 8 (9), Utrecht University, Utrecht.
• Breschi S., Lissoni F., 2006, Mobility of inventors and the geography of knowledge spillovers. New evidence on US data, KITeS Working Papers 184.
• Clarysse B., Degroof J.J., Heirman A., 2003, Growth paths of technology-based companies in life sciences and IT, European Communities: Luxembourg.
• Coenen L., Moodysson J., Asheim B.T., Jonsson O., 2003, The role of proximities for knowledge dynamics in a cross-border region: biotechnology in Oresund, DRUID Summer Conference 2003, Copenhagen.
• Coenen L., Moodysson J., Asheim B.T., 2004, Nodes, Networks and Proximities: On the Knowledge Dynamics of the Medicon Valley Biotech Cluster, European Planning Studies, 12 (7), 1003-1018.
• Cooke, P., 2004, The accelerating evolution of biotech clusters, European Planning Studies, 12 (7), 915-920.
• Dietz C., Chompalov I., Bozeman B., Lane E., Park J., 2000, Using the curriculum vita to study the career paths of scientists and engineers: An exploratory assessment, Scientometrics 49 (3), 419-442.
• Dosi G., 1988, Technical Change and Economic Theory, Pinter Publishers, New York.
• Gertler J., 1995, Being There: Proximity, Organization and Culture in the Development and Adoption of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies, Economic Geography, 71 (1), 1-26.
• Gertler M.S., 2003, Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or The undefinable tacitness of being (there), Journal of Economic Geography, 3, 75-99.
• Jaffe A., Trajtenberg M., Henderson R., 1993, Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108 (3), 577-598.
• Keeble D., Nachum L., 2002, Why do business service firms cluster? Small consultancies, clustering and decentralization in London and southern England, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 27 (1), 67-90.
• Lawton-Smith H., 2004, The Biotechnology Industry in Oxfordshire: Enterprise and Innovation, European Planning Studies, 12 (7), 985-1001.
• Life Sciences and Biotechnology in Poland, 2006, Bio-Con Valley, Greifswald.
• Pinch S., Henry N., 1999, Paul Krugman's geographical economics, industrial clustering and the British motor sport industry, Regional Studies, 33 (9), 815-827.
• Tamowicz P., 2006, Przedsiębiorczość akademicka. Spółki spin-off w Polsce, Polska Agencja Rozwoju Przedsiębiorczości, Warszawa.
• Ter Wal A.L.J., 2009, The structure and dynamics of knowledge networks: a proximity approach, Utrecht University, Utrecht.
• Ter Wal A.L.J., Boschma R.A., 2007, Co-evolution of firms, industries and networks in space, Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography 7 (7), Utrecht University, Utrecht.
• The Current State and Development Directions of the Bio-eocnomy (Stan i kierunki rozwoju biogospodarki), 2007, Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego, Warszawa.
• Van Beuzekom B., Arundel A., 2009, OECD Biotechnology Statistics, OE CD, Paris.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.4467/20833113PG.12.021.0662