PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2014 | 5 | nr 1 | 74--86
Tytuł artykułu

Validating Performance Based Critical Actions in a High Tech Start-Up

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The objective of this study is to analyze a Finnish manufacturing case company's operational competitiveness. A proposed analytical model based on analyses the corresponding angles of the strategic triangles (Prospector, Analyzer, and Defender). The model compares the angle differences between the strategy and resource triangles with opinions from different management groups of informants. It was found out that Normalized Scaled Critical Factor Index (NSCFI) model is more scientific comparing to formal ones through validation. Calculations based on the MSI questionnaire resulted in medium high values for the Prospector strategy both for past- and future orientation. S&R calculations regarding the past orientation resulted in low values for all strategy types, except P-NSCFI for Analyzer. Moreover this study covers a case, in where Balanced Critical Factor Index (BCFI) was used defining company annual strategy plan. (original abstract)
Rocznik
Tom
5
Numer
Strony
74--86
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • Vaasa University of Applied Sciences, Finland
autor
  • Vaasa University of Applied Sciences, Finland
  • Vaasa University of Applied Sciences, Finland
autor
  • Vaasa University of Applied Sciences, Finland
autor
  • Vaasa University of Applied Sciences, Finland
  • Tun Hussein Onn University of Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Vaasa University of Applied Sciences, Finland
  • Vaasa University of Applied Sciences, Finland
autor
  • Vaasa University of Applied Sciences, Finland
Bibliografia
  • [1] Liu Y., Wu Q., Zhao S., Takala J., Operations Strategy Optimization Based on Developed Sense and Respond Methodology, Kitakyushu, Japan, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Innovation & Management, 2011.
  • [2] Takala J., Liu Y., Feng B., Yang W.S., Analytical Evaluation of Sustainable Competitive Advantage, Moscow, Russia, IFAC Conference on Manufacturing Modelling, Management and Control Methodology, Vaasa, University of Vaasa, 2013.
  • [3] Johnson G., Scholes K., Whittington R., Exploring Corporate Strategy, Prentice Hall, Harlow, UK, 2005.
  • [4] Mintzberg H., Ahlstrand B.W., Lampel J., "Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management", http://cws.cengage.co.uk/barnes/students/sample ch/ch2.pdf (accessed 10 January 2013), 1998.
  • [5] Slack N., Lewis M., Operations Strategy, Prentice-Hall, Edinburgh, 2002.
  • [6] Skinner W., The productivity paradox, Harvard Business Review, 64, 4, 55-59, 1986.
  • [7] Miles R., Snow C., Organizational strategy, structure, and process, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1978.
  • [8] Haeckel S.H., Adaptive enterprise: creating and leading sense-and-respond organizations, Boston, Harvard Business School Press, 1999.
  • [9] Golovko Ivan, Directions of a Company's Preferable Strategy Type by Sense & Respond Methodology, Vaasa, University of Vaasa, 2012.
  • [10] Ranta J.M., Takala J., A Holistic Method for Finding out Critical Feature of Industry Maintenance Services [J], International Journal of Services and Standards, 3 (3), 312-325, 2007.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171325391

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.