PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2014 | 15(XV) | nr 2 | 84--93
Tytuł artykułu

Modifications of the Maximin Joy Criterion for Decision Making under Uncertainty

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Decision making under uncertainty (DMU) occurs when the decision maker (DM) has to choose an appropriate alternative on the basis of a set of decisions and a set of scenarios (with an unknown probability distribution). The author suggests two modifications of the maximin joy criterion (MJC) - one of the classical decision rules used in DMU by pessimists searching for an optimal pure strategy. The goal of the alterations for MJC is to accentuate more effectively the position of particular outcomes in comparison with other outcomes connected with a given scenario. (original abstract)
Twórcy
  • Poznań University of Economics, Poland
Bibliografia
  • Basili M., Chateauneuf A., Fontini F. (2008) Precautionary principle as a rule of choice with optimism on windfall gains and pessimism on catastrophic losses, Ecological Economics, 67, pp. 485-491.
  • Basili M., Chateauneuf A. (2011) Extreme events and entropy: A multiple quantile utility model, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 52, pp. 1095-1102.
  • Cannon C.M., Kmietowicz Z.W. (1974) Decision theory and incomplete knowledge, Journal of Management Studies 11(3), pp. 224-232.
  • Chateauneuf A., Cohen M., Jaffray J.-Y. (2008) Decision under uncertainty: the classical models, Documents de Travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne, Maison des Sciences Economiques, Paris.
  • de Finetti B. (1974) Theory of Probability, Wiley, New York.
  • Domurat J., Tyszka T. (2004) Historic and contemporary controversies on the concept of utility, Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 7(20), pp. 85-107.
  • Ellsberg D. (2001) Risk, ambiguity and decision, Garland Publishing, New York.
  • Etner J., Jeleva M., Tallon J.-M. (2012) Decision theory under ambiguity. Journal of Economic Surveys, 26(2), pp. 234-270.
  • Frank R.H. (1997) The frame of reference as a public good. The Economic Journal 107, pp. 1832-1847.
  • Gaspars H. (2007) Alokacja zasobu w warunkach niepewności: modele decyzyjne i procedury obliczeniowe. Badania operacyjne i decyzje 2007(1), pp. 5-27.
  • Gaspars-Wieloch H. (2012) Ograniczona skuteczność metod optymalizacyjnych w rozwiązywaniu ekonomicznych problemów decyzyjnych, Ekonomista 2012/3, pp. 303-324.
  • Gaspars-Wieloch H. (2013) On a decision rule supported by a forecasting stage based on the decision maker's risk aversion, In: SOR'13 Proceedings, The 12th International Symposium on Operational Research in Slovenia, September 25-27, 2013, ed. L. Zadnik Stirn, J. Zerovnik, J. Povh, S. Drobne and A. Lisec, Slovenian Society INFORMATIKA, Section for Operational Research, pp. 53-59.
  • Gaspars-Wieloch H. (2014a) Modifications of the Hurwicz's decision rules, Central European Journal of Operations Research 22(4), pp. 779-794, doi: 10.1007/s10100-013-0302-y.
  • Gaspars-Wieloch H. (2014b) On a decision for mixed strategy searching under uncertainty on the basis of the coefficient of optimism, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 110(2014), pp. 923-931.
  • Gaspars-Wieloch H. (2014c) On a decision rule supported by a forecasting stage based on the decision maker's coefficient of optimism, Central European Journal of Operations Research, doi: 10.1007/s10100-014-0364-5.
  • Gaspars-Wieloch H. (2014d) Propozycja hybrydy reguł Hurwicza i Bayesa w podejmowaniu decyzji w warunkach niepewności, In: Modelowanie preferencji a ryzyko'14, ed. T. Trzaskalik, Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, 178, pp. 74-92.
  • Gaspars-Wieloch H. (2015) The impact of the structure of the payoff matrix on the final decision made under uncertainty, Asia Pacific Journal of Operational Research (in print).
  • Ghirardato P., Maccheroni F., Marinacci M. (2004) Differentiating ambiguity and ambiguity attitude, Journal of Economic Theory 118, pp. 133-173.
  • Gilboa I. (2009) Theory of decision under uncertainty, Cambridge University Press.
  • Gilboa I., Schmeidler D. (1989) Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior, Journal of Mathematical Economics 18, pp. 141-153.
  • Groenewald M.E., Pretorius P.D. (2011) Comparison of decision making under uncertainty investment strategies with the money market, Journal of Financial Studies and Research, doi: 10.5171/2011.373376.
  • Guo P. (2011) One-shot decision theory, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A 41(5): pp. 917-926.
  • Hayashi T. (2008) Regret aversion and opportunity dependence. Journal of Economic Theory 139(1), pp. 242-268.
  • Hurwicz L. (1952) A criterion for decision making under uncertainty, Technical Report 355, Cowles Commission.
  • Kahneman D., Tversky A. (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47, pp. 263-291.
  • Knight F.H. (1921) Risk, uncertainty, profit, Hart. Schaffner & Marx, Houghton Mifflin Co, Boston MA.
  • Marinacci M. (2002) Probabilistic sophistication and multiple priors, Econometrica 70, pp. 755-764.
  • Piasecki K. (1990) Decyzje i wiarygodne prognozy, Akademia Ekonomiczna w Poznaniu.
  • Puppe C., Schlag K. (2009) Choice under complete uncertainty when outcome spaces are state dependent, Theory and Decision 66, pp. 1-16.
  • Savage L. (1961) The foundations of statistics reconsidered, In Studies in Subjective Probability, Wiley, New York, pp. 173-188.
  • Schmeidler D. (1986) Integral representation without additivity, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 97, pp. 255-261.
  • Sikora W. (2008) Badania operacyjne, Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne, Warszawa.
  • Tversky A., Kahneman D. (1992) Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5, pp. 297-323.
  • von Neumann J., Morgenstern O. (1944) Theory of games and economic behavior, Princeton University Press.
  • Wald A. (1950) Statistical decision functions, Wiley, New York.
  • Weber M. (1987) Decision making with incomplete information, European Journal of Operational Research 28, pp. 44-57.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171326365

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.