PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2014 | R. 12, nr 3, cz. 2 | 275--286
Tytuł artykułu

Applications of Implementation Diagrams in System Infrastructure Modeling

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Software architecture of systems under development as well as specification of ICT equipment on which systems' execution will be based upon are nowadays inherent elements of complete information system documentation. These aspects are in particular addressed by Unified Modeling Language (UML) by implementation-oriented diagrams. Two kinds of such diagrams could be singled out -component diagrams and deployment diagrams. The diagrams are used respectively for specifying and interconnecting software and hardware resources. The goal of the paper is to assess as well as to verify challenges and opportunities related to the applications of implementation diagrams within the development process of modern digital economy-oriented systems. After introduction to the article, the significance of the diagrams for infrastructure modeling is discussed in section 1. Section 2 is aimed at depicting functional capabilities of the diagrams. In the last section, the assessment and exemplification of the specific diagrams is introduced as a series of mini-cases. The case studies included in the paper cover the issues of intelligent metropolitan traffic management, IS-assisted store service as well as mobile devices-based electronic ticket purchasing. (original abstract)
Rocznik
Strony
275--286
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • Uniwersytet Gdański
  • Uniwersytet Gdański
  • Uniwersytet Gdański
Bibliografia
  • 1. Ahmed K.Z., Umrysh C.E. (2002), Developing Enterprise Java Applications with J2EE and UML, Addison-Wesley.
  • 2. Al-Fedaghi S., Abdullah A. (2013), A New Approach to Component-based Development of Software Architecture, "International Review on Computers & Software", Vol. 8.
  • 3. Bianco V., Lavazza L., Mauri M., Occorso G. (2003), Towards UML-based Formal Specifications of Component-based Real-time Software, in: Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering, 6th International Conference, Springer-Verlag.
  • 4. Booch G., Rumbaugh J., Jacobson I. (2004), The UML Reference Manual. 2nd Edition, Addison-Wesley.
  • 5. Erickson J., Siau K. (2007), Theoretical and Practical Complexity of Modeling Methods, "Communications of the ACM", Vol. 50.
  • 6. Holt J. (2007), UML for Systems Engineering: Watching the Wheels. 2nd Edition, The Institution of Engineering and Technology.
  • 7. Hommes B. J., van Reijswoud V. (2000), Assessing the Quality of Business Process Modeling Techniques, in: Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
  • 8. Jamroz K., Krystek R., Kustra W. (2007), The Concept for Integrated Traffic Management System within Gdañsk/Sopot/Gdynia Area. Part I: General Concept for TRISTAR Integrated Traffic Management System (in Polish), Gdansk City Hall.
  • 9. Kruchten P.B. (1995), The 4+1 View Model of Architecture, "IEEE Software", Vol. 12.
  • 10. Larman C. (2012), Applying UML and Patterns: An Introduction to Object-Oriented Analysis and Design and Iterative Development, 3/e, Pearson Education India.
  • 11. Lujan-Mora S., Trujillo J., Song I. (2006), A UML Profile for Multidimensional Modeling in Data Warehouses, "Data & Knowledge Engineering", Vol. 59.
  • 12. Mahmood S., Lai R. (2008), A Complexity Measure for UML Component-Based System Specification, "Journal of Software: Practice and Experience", Vol. 38.
  • 13. Mokarat, C., Vatanawood, W. (2013), UML Component Diagram to Acme Compiler, in: Information Science and Applications (ICISA), IEEE.
  • 14. Object Management Group (2012), Unified Modeling Language (UML). Version 2.4.1. Part 2: Superstructure, http://www.omg.org/spec/UML, accessed 22.09.2014.
  • 15. Object Management Group (2013), Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN). Version 2.0.1, http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN, accessed 22.09.2014.
  • 16. Shoval P., Kabeli J. (2005), Special Theme of Research in Information Systems Analysis and Design - II. Data Modeling or Functional Modeling -Which Comes First? An Experimental Comparison, "Communications of the Association for Information Systems", No. 16.
  • 17. Wrycza S., Marcinkowski B. (2005), UML 2 Teaching at Postgraduate Studies - Prerequisites and Practice, in: Colton D., Janicki T. (eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference for Information Systems Educators, AITP Foundation for Information Technology Education.
  • 18. Wrycza S., Marcinkowski B. (2007), Towards a Light Version of UML 2.x: Appraisal and Model, "Organizacija", No 4.
  • 19. Wrycza S., Marcinkowski B., Wyrzykowski K. (2006), UML 2.0 in Information Systems Modeling (in Polish), Helion.
  • 20. Zou J., Pavlovski C. (2008), Control Case Approach to Record and Model Non-functional Requirements, "Information Systems & e-Business Management", Vol. 6.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171334443

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.