Communicative Action, Deliberative and Restorative Justice - A Review

• Autorzy: Ştefan Vlăduţescu , Mirela Teodorescu
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Communicative Action, Deliberative and Restorative Justice - Socio-juridical perspective on mediational averment" by Antonio Sandu and Elena Unguru, published by TRITONIC in 2014, is a high level transdisciplinary lesson about transactional justice, restorative justice and deliberative alternative to classical (retributive and distributive). Antonio Sandu is Professor at the University "Ştefan cel Mare" from Suceava, and researcher at the Centre for Socio-Human Research Lumen in Iasi (Romania). The main interest of the author include ethics, bioethics, social assistance, social philosophy. He is the author of five books in Social Philosophy and Applied Ethics, more than 8 articles in scientific journals indexed by Thomson Reuters and over 20 other scientific articles. Elena Unguru is researcher in the fields of law, social work, sociology, communication, appreciative inquiry in Socio-Human Research Center Lumen from Iasi- Romania. We are led, naturally and professionally, on the sinuously road from conflict to communication also denoted by the establishment of the public sphere as social reality born of meeting and acceptance of the otherness, of individuality asserting in public space, postulating the universality of human nature as human rights. Starting from the Habermas' idea of communication power as a form of expression in contemporary society, the author believes that communicative action codes a power strategy based on consensus. Power is soft, seductive, and inter-mediate linguistic and cultural relations. The chosen theme by the authors analyze the communication mediation model based on the values of social justice, equity and charity, assuming an exercise of the integration of the otherness, of perceiving the other as partner. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Review; Social justice; Mediation; Communication; Restorative justice; Social philosophy

PL

Recenzja; Sprawiedliwość społeczna; Mediacje; Komunikowanie; Sprawiedliwość naprawcza; Filozofia społeczna

• Czasopismo: International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences (ILSHS)
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: 2 (1)
• Strony: 167--173

Twórcy

autor

Ştefan Vlăduţescu

autor

Mirela Teodorescu

Bibliografia

• Antonio Sandu, Elena Unguru (2014). Acțiune comunicativă, justiție deliberativă și restaurativă. București: Editura Tritonic.
• Andrzej Borowski, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 14 (2014) 33-41.
• Antonio Sandu (2014). Elemente de sociologie. Sociologie generală, sociologie juridică, metodologia cercetării sociale. București: Editura Tritonic.
• D. Balahur (2001). Fundamente socio-juridice ale probațiunii. Iași: Editura Bit.
• Sebastian Kot, Beata Ślusarczyk (2014). IT Role in Supply Chain Collaboration. Current Communication Difficulties, 165.
• Mihai Coman (1999). Introducere în sistemul mass-media. Polirom.
• Andrzej Borowski, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 6 (2013) 86-90.
• Elena Unguru, Antonio Sandu (2014). A Socio-Legal Approach of Probation in Light of the New Penal Code. Restorative Justice Versus Retributive Justice. European.
• J. H. Gasderell, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Science 22 (2014) 85-91.
• Antonio Sandu (2014). Social Construction of Reality. Epistemic, Ethical and Pragmatic Dimensions. Habilitation Thesis, Stefan cel Mare University, in progress.
• D. Cooperrider, D. Whitney, J. Stavros (2005). Appreciative Inquiry Handbook. The First in a Series in a AI Books for Leaders of Change. Brunswick: Crown Custom Publishing Inc.
• Joanna Tabor, Journal of Management Studies 9(1) (2014) 233-243.
• Ștefan Cojocaru (2005). Metode apreciative în asistența socială: ancheta, supervizarea, studiul de caz. Polirom.
• J. Habermas (1987). Theory of Communicative Action. Volume 2, Boston: Beacon Press.
• Andrzej Borowski, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 14 (2014) 7-17.
• D. Cojocaru, A. Sandu, S. Cojocaru, Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 28 (2011) 65-83.
• Maria Nowicka-Skowron, Sorin Mihai Radu (2014). Innovation process modelling. Current Communication Difficulties, 104.
• O. M. Cuichi, A. Sandu, Revista de cercetare şi intervenţie socială 30 (2010) 53-62.
• S. Cojocaru, Revista de Cercetare şi Intervenţie Socială 26 (2009) 76-86.
• Max G. Craig, Journal of Studies in Social Sciences 8(1) (2014).
• Marin Drămnescu (2014). Communication. Political speech. Populist speech. Topical Communication Uncertainties, 242.
• Vladimir Aurelian Enăchescu (2014). Teaching-communication barriers. Analysis and solutions. Current Communication Difficulties, 277.
• Ștefan Vlăduţescu (2014). Actants of manipulative communication. International.
• S. Cojocaru, A. Sandu, S. Ponea, Social Research Reports 8 (2010).
• A. Borowski, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 27 (2014) 100-110.
• A. Sandu, E. Unguru, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 82 (2013) 386-391.
• A. Borowski, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 4 (2013) 70-74.
• J. Habermas (1998). Sfera publică şi transformarea ei structurală. Studiul unei categorii a societăţii burgheze. Bucureşti: Editura Univers.
• J. Habermas (2000). Conştiinţă morală şi acţiune comunicativă. Bucureşti: Editura All Educaţional.