Leadership Styles and Employee Satisfaction: A Correlation Study

• Autorzy: Saeid Afshinpour
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The purpose of this quantitative correlation study was to determine the extent to which leadership style preferences correlate with employee satisfaction with supervision among employees and leaders of some companies. This study measured preferences for each of five common leadership styles and examined correlations with measures of employee satisfaction. The styles studied were transactional leadership, transformational leadership, autocratic leadership, charismatic leadership, and situational leadership. Results indicated that each of the five leadership styles has a positive correlation with employee satisfaction, suggesting that the situational leadership style may be the most appropriate style for leaders in some companies. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Leadership; Dismissal; Correlation analysis

PL

Przywództwo; Zwolnienie pracownika; Analiza korelacji

• Czasopismo: International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences (ILSHS)
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: 16 (2)
• Strony: 156--169

Twórcy

autor

Saeid Afshinpour

Bibliografia

• [1] Glaser J. E., Business Book Review 23(29) (2012) 2-10.
• [2] Moore G. A. (2013). Dealing with Darwin: How great companies innovate at every phase of their evolution. New York: The Penguin Group.
• [3] Houghton J. D., Yoho S. K., Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies 11(4) (2012) 65.
• [4] Hasgall A., Shoham S., Journal of Knowledge Management 12(1) (2008) 51.
• [5] Bass B. M. (1990). Handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications (3rd ed.). New York: The Free Press.
• [6] Kouzes J. M., Posner B. Z., Journal of Management Inquiry 14(4) (2013) 357-365.
• [7] Avolio B. J. (2007). Leadership development in balance: Made/born. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• [8] Northouse P. G. (2004). Leadership: Theory and practice (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• [9] Kerfoot K., Medsurg Nursing 17(2) (2013) 133-135.
• [10] Choi J., Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 12(1) (2011) 24-43.
• [11] Farmer L. A., Journal of Nursing Management 13 (2012) 483-489.
• [12] Long S., Spurlock D. G., Engineering Management Journal 20(2) (2013) 30-37.
• [13] Kao P., Kao H., Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge 10(2) (2010) 71-80.
• [14] Yukl G. (2011). Leadership in organizations (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
• [15] Creswell J. W. (2013). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
• [16] Ross S. C., The Journal of Applied Business and Economics 8(1) (2008) 46-56.
• [17] Agezo C. K., Ife Psychologia 16(2) (2010) 260-279.
• [18] Ghosh D., Journal of Managerial Issues 20(1) (2008) 68-90.
• [19] Smith L. A., Bergey P., Cantwell A. R., Doran M., Research Technology Management 49(4) (2012) 15-23.
• [20] Katz R. (2011). The human side of managing technological innovation (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University.
• [21] Akehurst G., Comenche J. M., Galindo M., Small Business Economics 32(3) (2013) 277-290.
• [22] Gall M. D., Gall J. P., Borg W. R. (2010). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). Boston: Pearson A & B.