Kwalifikacje właścicieli oraz sposób finansowania małych firm rodzinnych i nierodzinnych w Wielkopolsce. Podobieństwa i różnice

• Autorzy: Hanna Mizgajska

Warianty tytułu

Owners' Qualifications and Financing Methods of Small Family and Non-family Firms in the Wielkopolska Region. Similarities and Differences

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

W literaturze polskiej dotyczącej firm rodzinnych z sektora małych i średnich przedsiębiorstw niewiele miejsca poświęca się badaniom podobieństw i różnic w sposobie prowadzenia firm rodzinnych i nierodzinnych. Uważa się, że główne różnice dotyczą sfery wartości i kultury organizacyjnej i są związane z problemami sukcesji. Intencją autorki artykułu jest sprawdzenie czy teza wysunięta przez autorów projektu Pentora (2009) o braku istotnych różnic w zarządzaniu małymi przedsiębiorstwami rodzinnymi i nierodzinnymi jest prawdziwa. Celem artykułu jest odpowiedź na pytanie czy kwalifikacje właścicieli firm oraz źródła finansowania małych firmach rodzinnych i nierodzinnych są podobne czy różne. (fragment tekstu)

EN

The aim of the article is to answer the question whether qualifications and financing methods of owners of small family and non-family firms are similar or different. The owner's or manager's qualificarions are understood as the level of formal education, training and professional experience. Professional experience refers to a period prior to establishing one's own business, holding a managerial position, having a job in line with formal education as well as experience in running one's own firm. Financing methods refer to making use of bank credits and EU funds. The study used empirical material collected through questionnairies among twenty-six family and fifty-six non-family firms employing up to fifty people each in the Wielkopolska region. The study showed that small family firms differ substantially from non-family ones in respect to the level of formal education of the owners and how long the company has been on the market. Formal education of owners of small family firms is lower than those of non-family ones. Family-run businesses, however, are able to operate on the market longer than the non-family firms. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Przedsiębiorstwo rodzinne; Przedsiębiorstwo; Kwalifikacje menedżera; Źródła finansowania; Wykształcenie; Małe i średnie przedsiębiorstwa

EN

Family-owned business; Enterprises; Managerial qualifications; Source of financing; People's education; Small business

• Czasopismo: Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie
• Rocznik: 2014
• Numer: t. 15, z. 7, cz. 2 Firmy Rodzinne - współczesne nurty badań i praktyki zarządzania
• Strony: 31--41

Twórcy

autor

Hanna Mizgajska

• Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu

Bibliografia

• Badanie firm rodzinnych. Raport końcowy PARP, 2009 [online] http://firmyrodzinne.pl/download/pentor/Raport_koncowy_Badanie_firm_rodzinnych, dostęp : 20 .01. 2014.
• Birley S. (1997), The family and the business. London: Grant Thornton.
• Chrisman J.J., Chua J., Sharma P ( 2003), Current trends and future directions in family business management studies: toward a theory of the family firm, Colemen White Papers Series , Coleman Foundation.
• Chua J., Chrisman J.J., Sharma P. (1999), Defining the family business by behavior, "Entrepreneurship Theory and Practise", 23 (4).
• Cooper M., Upton N., Seaman S. (2005), Customer relationship management: a comparative analysis of family and nonfamily business practices, "Journal of Small Business Management", vol.43, no 3.
• Cromie S., Stephenson B., Monteith D. (1995), The management of family firms: An empirical investigation, "International Small Business Journal", 13 (4).
• Fernandez Z., Nieto M. (2005), Internationalization strategy of small and medium-sized family businesses: some influential factors, "Family Business Review" vol. 18, no 1.
• Gallo M.A. (1995), The role of family business and its distinctive characteristic behavior in industrial activity, "Family Business Review", 12 (1).
• Gersick K.E., Davis J., Hampton M., Lansberg I. (1997), Generation to generation: Life cycles of the family Business, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
• Guldbrandsen T. ( 2005), Flexibity in Norwegian family - owned enterprises, "Family Business Review", vol.18, no. 1.
• Jorissen A., Laveren E., Martens R., Reheul A. (2005), Real versus sample -based differences in comparative family business research, "Family Business Review", vol. 18 (3).
• Litz R.A. (1995), The family business: toward definitional clarity, "Family Business Review", 8 (2).
• Murphy D. (2005), Understanding the complexities of private family firms: an empirical investigation, "Family Business Review", vol. 18, no,2.
• Reid R.S., Adams J.S. (2001), Human Resource Management - a survey of practices within family and non-family firms, "Journal of European Industrial Training", 25 (6).
• Reid R., Morrow T., Kelly B., Adams J., McCartan P.(2000), Human resource management practices in SMEs: A comparative analysis of family and non-family businesses, "Journal of the Irish Academy of Management", 21 (2).
• Sharma P. (2004 ), An overview of the fields of family business studies: Current Status and Directions for the Future, "Family Business Review", 17 (1).
• Smith M. (2006), An empirical comparison of the managerial development of family and non-family SMEs from Australia's manufacturing sector, "Journal of Enterprising Culture", vol. 14, no. 2.
• Smith M. (2007), "Real" managerial differences between family and non-family firms, "International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research", vol. 13, no.5.
• Westhead P., Cowling, M. (1998), Performance contracts between family and non-family unquoted companies in the UK, "International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research" 3 (1).
• Zahra S. (2005), Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms, Family Business Review, vol. 18, no. 1.