Art and Being in Neutrosophic Communication

• Autorzy: Elena Rodica Opran , Dan Valeriu Voinea , Mirela Teodorescu
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

What seems to suggest various avant-garde and artistic experimentalism movements from futurism to cubism, from expressionism to surrealism, from Picasso to the great masters of informal art is a Beauty of challenge. The avant-garde art does not arise the issue of Beauty. It is understood without saying that the new images are "beautiful" in terms of art and that should produce the same pleasure that feel the contemporaries of Rafael and Giotto in front of their works" asserts Umberto Eco (Eco, 2005). The phenomenon is due to the fact that the challenge of avant-garde tear down all aesthetic canons, observed at the moment. Art no longer aims to offer images of natural beauty, no longer occasion for calm pleasure of contemplation the harmonious forms. Instead, it wants to lead to an interpretation of the world from a different optic, wants to return to archaic or exotic models: the universe of dreams or ill mentally fantasies, visions experienced under the drugs influence, rediscovering matter, chaotic household objects current location in contexts unlikely (new object, Dadaist movement etc.), unconscious impulses, of uncertainties, of confusion, of neutrality. The study aims to explore Beauty and ugly in terms of neutrosophic concept. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Art

PL

Sztuka

• Czasopismo: International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences (ILSHS)
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: 6 (1)
• Strony: 16--27

Twórcy

autor

Elena Rodica Opran

• University of Craiova, Romania

autor

Dan Valeriu Voinea

• University of Craiova, Romania

autor

Mirela Teodorescu

Bibliografia

• Arthur C. Danto (2003). The Abuse of Beauty. Chicago and La Salle: Open Court.
• George Dickie (1974). Art and the Aesthetic: An Institutional Analysis. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
• W. A. Quffa, D. V. Voinea, Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice (2) (2013) 261- 266.
• Spinoza (1993). Etica, Bucuresti: Editura Antet.
• Nelson Goodman (1976). Languages of Art. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.
• Paolo Di Sia, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 3 (2015) 21-28.
• J. A. Passmore (1954). The Dreariness of Aesthetics. In W. Elton, ed. Aesthetics and Language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
• Florentin Smarandache (2005). A Unifying Field in Logics: Neutrosophic Logic. Neutrosophy, Neutrosophic Set, Neutrosophic Probability: Neutrsophic Logic. Neutrosophy, Neutrosophic Set, Neutrosophic Probability. Infinite Study.
• Ludwig Wittgenstein (1970) Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology & Religious Belief. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
• Umberto Eco (2005). Istoria Frumosului. Bucuresti: Editura RAO.
• Ştefan Vlăduţescu, American International Journal of Contemporary Research 3(10) (2013).
• Umberto Eco (2007). Istoria Uratului. Bucuresti: Editura RAO.
• Hegel, 1966, Prelegeri de estetica, vol. I, Bucuresti, Editura Academiei.
• Florentin Smarandache, Stefan Vladutescu, Revista de Cercetare şi Intervenţie Socială, (46) (2014) 243-254.
• Ștefan Cojocaru (2005). Metode apreciative în asistența socială: ancheta, supervizarea, studiul de caz. Polirom.
• Antonio Sandu (2014). Elemente de sociologie. București: Editura Tritonic.
• Oprea-Valentin Buşu, Mirela Teodorescu, Daniela Gîfu, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 27 (2014) 82-93.
• Răzvan Alexandru Călin (2014). Psychology of the Archetype Symbol in Orthodox Church Picture and Architecture. Neutrosophy, Paradoxism and Communication, 178.
• Arthur C. Danto (1997). After the End of Art: Contemporary Art and the Pale of History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• G. W. F. Hegel (1975). Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Art. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• F. Smarandache (1998). A Unifying Field in Logics, Neutrosophic Logic/Neutrosophy, Neutrosophic Set, Neutrosophic Probability, Am. Res. Press.
• F. Smarandache (2000). Linguistic Paradoxes and Tautologies. Collected Papers, Vol. III, 3, 122.
• Andrzej Borowski, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 14 (2014) 7-17.
• Ștefan Vlăduțescu, Xenia Negrea, Dan Valeriu Voinea (2014). Interpersonal Communicational Manipulations. Postmodern Openings.
• D. Cojocaru, A. Sandu, S. Cojocaru, Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies (28) (2011) 65-83.
• Maria Nowicka-Skowron, Sorin Mihai Radu (2014). Innovation process modelling. Current Communication Difficulties, 104.
• Max G. Craig, Journal of Studies in Social Sciences 8(1) (2014).
• Ștefan Vlăduţescu (2014). Actants of manipulative communication. International.
• Smarandache, F. (2002). 2002b), Neutrosophy, A New Branch of Philosophy, in Multiple- Valued Logic. In An international journal.
• A. Borowski, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences (27) (2014) 100-110.
• Smarandache, F. (2010). Neutrosophic Logic as a Theory of Everything in Logistics. Multispace and Multistructure. Neutrosophic Transdisciplinariry (100 Collected Papers of Sciences), 525-527.
• Mihaela Mocanu, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 4 (2015) 46-55.
• Florentin Smarandache & Ștefan Vlăduțescu (2014). Communicative Universal Convertibility Matter- Energy-Information. Social Sciences and Education Research Review.
• Smarandache, F. (2010). Neutrosophic Logic-A Generalization of the Intuitionistic Fuzzy Logic. Multispace & Multistructure. Neutrosophic Transdisciplinarity (100 Collected Papers of Science), 4, 396.
• F. Smarandache, Ș. Vlăduţescu (2014). Neutrosophic Emergences and Incidences in Communication and Information. Saarbrucken: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.
• L. Mao (2003). Proceedings of the First International Conference On Smarandache Multispace & Multistructures (28-30 June 2003, Beijing, China), Edited by Linfan Mao.
• D. Hume (1975). A Treatise of Human Nature. edited by L. A. Selby-Bigge, 2nd ed. revised by P. H. Nidditch, Oxford: Clarendon Press,
• Ștefan Vlăduțescu, Dan Valeriu Voinea & Elena Rodica Opran (2014). Theory and practical of the paradoxist aesthetics. In Neutrosophy, Paradoxism and Communiction. Craiova: Sitech.
• Aili Kurtis, Essay - Art for art's sake - http://www.ailikurtis.com/ArtForArtsSake.html
• Ștefan Vlăduțescu, Claudiu Marian Bunăiașu, Alexandru Constantin Strungă, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 3 (2015) 53-60.
• Harold Rosenberg (1959). The Tradition of the New. Ayer Co Pub.
• Christofer Witcomb (1995). Art History Resources- The End of Art. London
• I. C. Dima, J. Grabara, S. Vlăduțescu (2014). Comparative study on online education in Romania and Poland in terms of current globalization. Polish Journal of Management Studies.
• Stephen Hicks (2004). Why Art Became Ugly, issue of Navigator magazine, The Atlas Society precursor to The New Individualist.
• Ruth Lorand (2007). In Defense of Beauty, www.aestetics-online.org
• D. Gifu, V., Modrak, M. Teodorescu, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences (24) (2014) 56-65.
• Ștefan Vlăduțescu, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 15(2) (2014) 164- 170.
• Dan Ionescu, Mirela Teodorescu, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 27 (2014) 94-99.
• Mihaela Gabriela Păun, Mirela Teodorescu (2014). Hermeneutics can make beauty and ugly as neutral (as neutrosophic). Social Sciences and Education Research Review.
• Janusz Grabara, Michal Kolcun, Sebastian Kot, International Journal of Education and Research 2(2) (2014).
• Ştefan Vlăduţescu, European Scientific Journal 9(32) (2013).
• A. Sandu (2009). Tehnici afirmativ-apreciative. O sociopedagogie a succesului. Lumen.
• A. Sandu, Postmodern Openings (3) (2014) 49-66.
• B. Ślusarczyk, R. Golnik, R. The recruitment process in transnational corporations. Polish Journal of Management Studies.
• Ștefan Vlăduțescu & Florentin Smarandache (2014). Five Computational Actions in Information Processing. Social Sciences and Education Research Review.
• M. G. Mangra, E. A. Cotoc, A. Traistaru, Journal of Studies in Social Sciences 6(1) (2013).
• J. H. Gasderell, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Science 22 (2014) 85-91.
• C. M. Bunăiașu, Ș. Vlăduțescu, A. C. Strungă, Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala 6(2) (2014) 17-27.
• Adrian Nicolescu, Mirela Teodorescu, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 2(1) (2015) 48-59.
• D. Gifu, J. Novak-Marcincin, M. Teodorescu, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences (27) (2014) 22-33.
• Jozef Novak-Marcincin, Adrian Nicolescu, Mirela Teodorescu, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 1(2) (2015) 140-145.
• Paolo Di Sia, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 1(2) (2015) 146-153.
• Jacek Tittenbrun, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 3 (2015) 29-44.