Actants of Manipulative Communication

• Autorzy: Ştefan Vlăduţescu
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The study starts from assumption that together with disinfomation, intoxication, and propaganda, the manipulation is a form of persuasion, a form of persuasive communication. The manipulation is a communicative action. By the way of meta-analytical method, we emphasize some ideas. The royal way of promoting the decisive interests is manipulation-, often accompanied by constraints and violence. The world is divided into amateur manipulators and professional manipulators. Professionals are those whose job is exactly to get something from the others. The action of manipulation is not an activity performed on inspiration, randomly and by ear. Manipulation is a structured, organised and planned persuasive intervention. As actants of manipulative communication are retained journalists, priests, businessmen, sellers, scholars, teachers, artists, writers, notabilities. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

People manipulation; Communication; Interpersonal communication; Communicate psychology

PL

Manipulowanie ludźmi; Komunikowanie; Komunikowanie interpersonalne; Psychologia komunikowania

• Czasopismo: International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences (ILSHS)
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: 29
• Strony: 41--47

Twórcy

autor

Ştefan Vlăduţescu

• University of Craiova, Romania

Bibliografia

• R. V. Joule, J. L. Beauvois (1997). Tratat de manipulare. Bucureşti, Editura Antet.
• Andrzej Borowski, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 14 (2014) 7-17.
• Johnson A. J., Hample D., Cionea I. A. (2014). 5 Understanding Argumentation in Interpersonal Communication. Communication Yearbook 38.
• Sebastian Kot, Janusz Grabara, Michal Kolcun, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 15 (2014) 1-6.
• Veronica Ion (2012). The religiuos changes of the post communist Balkan societies. Revista de Stiinţe Politice.
• W. H. Riker (1986). The art of political manipulation (Vol. 587). Yale University Press.
• N. Lupaşcu (2012). Propaganda si manipulare, seductie sau convingere?.Logos, Universality, Mentality, Education, Novelty Section: Political Sciences and European Studies, (1), 103-119.
• B. Teodorescu (2007). Cinci milenii de manipulare. Ed. Tritonic.
• P. Bajdor, I. Grabara, Journal of Studies in Social Sciences 7(2) (2014).
• Gabriela Ilie Journal of Community Positive Practices 13(3) (2013) 100-112.
• Andrzej Borowski, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 14 (2014) 33-41.
• M. Colhon (2013). Automatic Lexical Alignment between Syntactically Weak Related Languages. Application for English and Romanian. In Computational Collective Intelligence. Technologies and Applications (pp. 266-275). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
• D. Dunca (2013). Persuasiunea şi manipularea-coordonate etice şi pragmatice. Buletin Stiintific, seria A, Fascicula Filologie.
• Max G. Craig, Journal of Studies in Social Sciences 8(1) (2014).
• J. D. Peters (2012). Speaking into the Air: A History of the Idea of Communication. University of Chicago Press.
• Andrzej Borowski, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 4 (2013) 70-74.
• G. Rajović, J. Bulatović, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 6 (2013) 24-35.
• Coman I., Gross P. (2012). Uncommonly Common or Truly Exceptional? An Alternative to the Political System - Based Explanation of the Romanian Mass Media. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 1940161212450562.
• A. Borowski, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 11 (2014) 1-168.
• Cristiana Nicola Teodorescu (2006). Comunicarea, dificultăţile unei definiţii. Omagiu Gheorghe Bolocan (pp. 527-537). Craiova: Editura Universitaria
• N. M. Sperdea, M. G. Mangra, M. Stanciu (2010). Trends Regarding The Level Of The Processing, Assortment Structure And The Quality Of The Food Products. Annals of the University of Petrosani, Economics.
• B. McNair (2011). An introduction to political communication. Taylor & Francis.
• I. A. Coman (2011). US Mediated Public Diplomacy in a Crisis: Romanian Case Analysis of Romanian Media Versus US Embassy Framing.
• Andrzej Borowski, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 2 (2014) 110-121.
• M. Priku, J. Bushati, A. Sula, L. Kashahu, European Scientific Journal 10(14) (2014).
• S. Cojocaru, D. Cojocaru, O. Bunea (2010). Family strengthening program. Evaluation report (English version). Social Research Reports.
• O. M. Cuichi, A. Sandu (2010). Affirmative dimensions of applied ethics. Appreciative therapies. Revista de cercetare şi intervenţie social.
• A. Erich, E. Tîrziman (2007). Informaţie şi document în societatea cunoaşterii. Ed. Bibliotheca.
• S. Cojocaru (2012). Appreciative Approach in Social Work. Exceeding the Limits Constructed by Deficiency Paradigm. Logos, Universality, Mentality, Education, Novelty Section: Philosophy and Humanistic Sciences.
• D. Cojocaru (2012). Parenting education programs. What do we know about this domain in Romania?. Logos, Universality, Mentality, Education, Novelty Section: Philosophy and Humanistic Sciences.
• Ştefan Vlăduţescu, American International Journal of Contemporary Research 3(10) (2013).
• C. E. Ciovica, F. Cristian, V.-A. Enăchescu (2011). Communication and conflict-an intercultural approach. Euromentor Journal-Studies about education.
• Vîlceanu, T. (2009). Cultural diversity management and linguistic security. Analele Universităţii din Craiova. Seria Ştiinţe Filologice. Lingvistică.
• Băluţă O., Dragolea A., Iancu A. (2007). Gen şi interese politice. Teorii şi practici, (Gender and political interests. Theories and practices), Polirom, Iaşi.
• D. Rovenţa-Frumuşani (1999). Semiotică, societate, cultură. Iaşi, Institutul.
• M. Coman (2005). Media anthropology: An overview. Media Anthropology Network Working Paper Series, 17-24 May. Available at: www. philbu. net/mediaanthropology/ workingpapers. htm.
• Nicolae Panea (2012). Antropologie Culturală Americană. Craiova: Editura Univesitaria.
• D. Gîfu (2007). Utilization of technology for linguistic processing in an electoral context: Method LIWC-2007. Proceedings of the Communication, Context, Interdisciplinary Congress, Vol. 1, 87-98.
• Janusz Grabara, Michal Kolcun, Sebastian Kot, International Journal of Education and Research 2(2) (2014).
• P. Anghel (2003). Stiluri şi metode de comunicare. Editura Aramis, Bucureşti.
• Nicolae Panea (2013). Orașul subtil. București: Editura Etnologică.
• Aurelia Traistaru (2013). Consolidation of the green marketing profile in current austerity period. Jokull.
• J. H. Gasderell, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Science 22 (2014) 85-91.
• F. Smarandache (1991). Only problems, not solutions!. Infinite Study.
• M. Iovanescu, A. Radulescu (2000). La terminologie de la mode-entre l'emprunt au français et la création autochtone. Revue roumaine de linguistique.
• Cătălin Ghiță (2012). William Blake's aesthetic vision: Milton1. Memory, Identity and Intercultural Communication.
• Vlad Roşca Theoretical and Applied Economics 1(1) (2012) 127.
• Andrzej Borowski, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 3 (2013) 69-74.
• M. Spiridon (2004). Les dilemmes de l'identité aux confins de l'Europe: le cas roumain. l'Harmattan.
• Andrzej Borowski, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 27 (2014) 100-110.
• Jason L. Powell, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 16(2) (2014) 177-183.