PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2014 | 13 | nr 2 | 51--71
Tytuł artykułu

The Evolution of Russian Macro-Level Management - the Case of Energy Efficiency Policy

Autorzy
Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Ewolucja rosyjskiego makro-zarządzania - przypadek polityki wydajności energetycznej
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Background. The paper gives a critical overview of macro-level management efforts to increase energy efficiency in Russia in 1995-2013 with special focus on the shift in goals, methods and approaches. We compare the pace and the trend of evolution of Russian energy efficiency policy with world trends and discuss the effects of policy diffusion on international and regional levels.
Research aim. Using the conceptual framework of an extended energy-efficiency gap, this study investigates the existing barriers to energy efficiency and suggests the possible solutions for improvement of energy policy on regional level.
Method. We gathered the information for evaluation of effectiveness of current energy policy by empirical research in the form of a mix of medium-scale face-to-face inquiries and semi-structured interviews.
Key findings. The findings reveal that the most common barrier is the lack of expertise and competences to identify the inefficiencies, and opportunities to implement energy efficiency measures needs to be overcome first for further improvement of energy efficiency. The convergence of expertise can happen through horizontal interactions on regional level as well as specially organized training programs at the federal level with the participation of international experts. (original abstract)
Tło badań. W pracy przedstawiono krytyczny przegląd wykonywanych działań zarządzania na poziomie makroekonomicznym w celu zwiększenia efektywności energetycznej w Rosji w latach 1995-2013 ze szczególnym naciskiem na zmiany celów, metod oraz podejścia. Porównujemy tempo i tendencje ewolucji rosyjskiej polityki efektywności energetycznej ze światowymi trendami i omawiamy wpływ oddziaływania polityki poprzez jej dyfuzję na poziomie międzynarodowym i regionalnym.
Cele badań. Wykorzystując ramy koncepcyjne rozszerzonej luki efektywności energetycznej, niniejsza praca bada istniejące bariery w zakresie efektywności energetycznej i sugeruje możliwe rozwiązania dla poprawy polityki energetycznej na szczeblu regionalnym.
Metodyka. Zebraliśmy informacje celem oceny skuteczności obecnej polityki energetycznej poprzez badania empiryczne w postaci połączenia ankiety wykonanej twarzą w twarz na średnią skalę oraz częściowo strukturyzowanego wywiadu.
Kluczowe wnioski. Wyniki badań pokazują, że najczęstszą barierą jest brak wiedzy i kompetencji koniecznych do zidentyfikowania nieefektywności i możliwości, a także do wdrożenia srodków w zakresie efektywności energetycznej, co należy najpierw przezwyciężyć w celu dalszej poprawy efektywności energetycznej. Konwergencja doświadczenia i wiedzy może nastąpić poprzez poziomą interakcję na szczeblu regionalnym, jak również za pośrednictwem specjalnie zorganizowanych programów szkoleniowych na szczeblu federacyjnym z udziałem ekspertów międzynarodowych. (abstrakt oryginalny)
Rocznik
Tom
13
Numer
Strony
51--71
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • Russian Academy of Sciences
Bibliografia
  • Backlund, S., Thollander, P., Palm, J., & Ottosson, M. (2012). Extending the energy efficiency gap. Energy Policy, 51, 392-396.
  • Bashmakov, I., & Myshak, A. (2014). Russian energy efficiency accounting system. Energy Efficiency, 1-17.
  • Bernauer, T., Kalbhenn, A., Koubi, V., & Spilker, G. (2010). A comparison of international and domestic sources of global governance dynamics. British Journal of Political Science, 40(10), 509-538.
  • Blumstein, C., Krieg, B., Schipper, L., & York, C. (1980). Overcoming social and institutional barriers to energy conservation. Energy, 5(4), 355-371.
  • Brown, M. (1995). Market failures and barriers as a basis for clean energy policies. Contemporary economic policy, 29(14), 1197-1207.
  • Busch, P., & Jörgens, H. (2012). Europeanization through diffusion? Renewable energy policies and alternative sources for European convergence. In European Energy Policy: An Environmental Approach. (pp. 66-82). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • CEE. (1995). Russian Energy Picture: Statistical Bulletin. Moscow: Center for Energy Efficiency.
  • de Almeida, E. (1998). Energy efficiency and the limits of market forces: the example of the electric motor market in France. Energy Policy, (8), 643-653.
  • DeCanio, S. (1994). Agency and control problems in US corporations: the case of energy efficient investment projects. Journal of Economics of Business, (1), 105-124.
  • DeCanio, S., & Watkins, W. (1998). Investment in energy efficiency: do the characteristics of firm matter? Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(1), 95-107.
  • Energy Balance Forecasting Agency. (2006). Performance and Development of Russian Elecricity in 2006. Moscow.
  • Euroheat & Power. (2013). District Heating and Cooling: Country by Country Survey. Brussels: Euroheat&Power.
  • Eyre, N. (1997). Barriers to energy efficiency: more than just market failure. Energy and Environment, (8), 25-43.
  • Flyvberg, B. (2004). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. In Qualitative Research Practice (pp. 420-434). Sage-London: Thousand Oaks.
  • Fromme, J. (1996). Energy conservation in the Russian manufacturing industry: potentials and obstacles. Energy Policy, 24, 245-252.
  • Golove, W., & Eto, J. (1996). Market barriers to energy efficiency: a critical reappraisal of the rationale for public policies to promote energy efficiency. Berkeley: Energy & Environment Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
  • Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How Many Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82.
  • Hatch, M. (2006). Organisation theory: modern, symbolic, and postmodern perspectives. Second edition. Oxford, USA: Oxford University Press.
  • Hewett, M. (1998). Achieving energy efficiency in a restructured electric utility industry prepared for Minnesotans for and energy efficiency economy. Mineapolis, MN, USA.
  • Hirst, E., & Brown, M. (1990). Closing the efficiency gap: barriers to the efficient use of energy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, (3).
  • Holzinger, K., Knill, C., & Sommerer, T. (2008). Environmental Policy Convergence: The Impact of International Harmonization, Transnational Communication, and Regulatory Competition. International Organization, 62(4), 553-587.
  • IEA. (2002). Russia Energy Survey. Paris: OECD/IEA.
  • IEA. (2002). Russia Energy Survey. Paris: IEA.
  • IEA. (2005). Russian Electricity Reform. Paris: OECD/IEA.
  • IEA. (2006). Russian Electricity Reform. Paris: IEA.
  • Jaffe, A., & Stavins, R. (1994). The energy-efficiency gap: what does it mean? Energy Policy.
  • Korovkin, A. (2011). The problems of labor supply and labor demand adjustment on the Russian labor market. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 22(2), 177-190.
  • Korovkin, A., & Korolev, I. (2005). Macroeconomic analysis of correlation dynamics industry labour market and education system. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 4.
  • Korovkin, A., Dolgova, I., & Korolev, I. (2011). Consequences of the inertial development of the labor potential in the Russian Federation. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 22(6), 637-649.
  • Korovkin, A., Dolgova, I., Korolev, I., Podorvanova, Y., & Polezhaev, A. (2005). Employment and labor market in Russia: problems and restrictions. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 5, [in Russian].
  • Korppoo, A. (2005). Russian energy efficiency projects: lessons learnt from Activities Implemented Jointly pilot phase. Energy Policy, 33, 113-126.
  • Kruckov, V., Silkin, V., & Shmat, V. (2012). Test Eastern Siberia. Expert Siberia, 34.
  • Levy, J. (2007). Federalism, liberalism and the separation of loyalties. American Political Science Review, 101(3), 459-477.
  • Martinot, E. (1997). Investments to Improve the Energy Efficiency of Existing Residential Buildings in Countries of the Former Soviet Union. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • Martinot, E. (1998). Energy efficiency and renewable energy. Energy Policy, 26(11), 905-915.
  • Morgan, G. (1997). Images of organisation. 2nd edition. London, UK: Sage.
  • Nekrasov, A., Voronina, S., & Semikashev, V. (2012). Problems of residential heat supply in Russia. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 23(2), 128-134.
  • Nichols, A. (1994). Demand-side management overcoming market barriers or obscuring real costs? Energy Policy, 22(10), 840-847.
  • Painuly, J., & Reddy, B. (1996). Electricity conservation programs: barriers to their implementation. Energy Sources, 18(3).
  • Perrin, S., & Bernauer, T. (2010). International regime formation revisited: explaining ratification behaviour with respect to long-range transboundary air pollution agreements in Europe. European Union Politics, 11, 405-426.
  • Ratner, S. (2014). Factors of energy-intensity reduction. National Interests: Priorities and Security [in Russian], 25, 2-10.
  • Schaffer, L. M., & Bernauer, T. (2014). Explaining government choices for promoting renewable energy. Energy Policy, 68, 15-27.
  • Scruggs, L. (2003). Sustaining Abundance: Environmental Performance in Industrial Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Seligman, C., Becker, L., & Darley, L. (1981). Encouraging residential energy conservation through feedback, in advances in environmental psychology. London, UK: Psychology Press.
  • Shipley, A., & Elliot, R. (2001). Proceedings of the 2001 ACEEE summer study on energy efficiency in industry. Energy efficiency programs for small and medium sized industry.
  • Sorrell, S., Mallett, A., & Nye, S. (2010). Barriers to industrial energy efficiency: a literature review, background study for the UNIDO industrial development report (IDR) 'industrial energy efficiency pays, why is it not happening? Brighton: SPRU, University of Sussex.
  • Sorrell, S., Schleich, J., Scott, S., O'Malley, E., Trace, F., Boede, U., & Radgen, P. (2000). Reducing barriers to energy efficiency in public and private organizations. Brighton: Energy research centre - science and technology policy research (SPRU), University of Sussex.
  • Stern, P. (1984). Energy use: the human dimension. New York: W.H. Freeman.
  • Tanaka, K. (2011). Review of policies and measures for energy efficiency in industry sector. Energy Policy, (39), 6532-6550.
  • Thollander, P., Danestig, M., & Rohdin, P. (2007). Energy policies for increased industrial energy efficiency evaluation of a local energy programme for manufacturing SMEs. Energy Policy, (35), 5774-5783.
  • Vine, E., Harmin, J., Eyre, N., Crosley, D., Maloney, M., & Watt, G. (2003). Public policy analysis of energy efficiency and load management in changing electricity businesses. Energy Policy, (31), 405-430.
  • Volkova, E., Zakharov, A., Podkoval'nikov, S., Savel'ev, V., Semenov, K., & Chudinova, L. (2012). System and management problems of the electric power industry's development in Russia. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 23(4), 363-370.
  • Ward, H., & Cao, X. (2012). Domestic and International Influences on Green Taxation. Comparative Political Studies, 45, 1075-1103.
  • World Bank Group. (2008). Energy Efficiency in Russia: Untapped Reserves. Washington D.C.: IFC-World Bank.
  • World Bank Group. (2012). The State and Trends of the Carbon Market. Washington D.C.: World Bank.
  • Yin, R. (2002). A case study research: Design and Methods. CA: Sage: Thousand Oaks.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171356831

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.