Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2012 | R. 10, z. 5 | 45--62
Tytuł artykułu

The Global Financial Crisis, the Eurozone Crisis and Their Consequences for the Polish Economy

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
The Polish economy responded to the global fi nancial crisis diff erently than the remaining economies of Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). Although it lost some growth impetus, the positive growth rates were maintained during the crisis, thus rendering Poland, next to Australia, a rare case among the OECD countries. Why? By means of addressing this question, the specifi cities of four economies, i.e. the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and the Slovak Republic are examined and the roots behind the variability of their responses to the crisis are identifi ed. It is argued that the variability of responses to the crisis can be explained by reference to the diff erences in the transformation strategies employed in each of these countries, which resulted in diff erent levels of development, openness, and competitiveness. This infl uences respective economies' responses to shocks such as the .eurozone crisis and helps to explain the reasons behind Poland's sustained growth (original abstract)
Opis fizyczny
  • Warsaw School of Economics, Poland
  • A. Buckley, Financial Crisis. Causes, Context and Consequences, Prentice Hall-Pearson, London-New York 2011, pp. 2-8.
  • J. Tobin, Monetary policies and the economy: the transmission mechanism, Cowles Foundation on Contemporary Macroeconomic Theory, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1980.
  • K. Schwab, The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013, World Economic Forum, Geneva 2012, p. 14.
  • P. van den Noord, I. P. Székely (eds.), Economic Crisis in Europe. Causes, Consequences and Responses, EU Information Series, Routledge, London-New York 2012.
  • K. Żukrowska (ed.), Transformacja systemowa w Polsce, SGH, Warszawa 2010, pp. 789-799.
  • K. Żukrowska (ed.) Transformation in Poland and in the Southern Mediterranean. Sharing Experiences, Poltext, Warsaw 2010, pp. 69-90.
  • P.-P. Kuczynski, J. Williamson (eds.), After the Washington Consensus: Restarting Growth and Reform in Latin America, Peterson Institute for International Economics, Washington 2003.
  • J. Williamson, A Short History of the Washington Consensus, [in:] N. Serra, J. Stiglitz (eds.), The Washington Consensus Reconsidered. Towards a New Global Governance, Oxford University Press 2008, pp. 14-40.
  • European Commission, Lisbon Strategy Evaluation Document, Commission Staff Working Document, Brussels, 2.2.2010, SEC (2010), 114 final.
  • European Commission, Europe 2020. A Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth, Communication from the Commission, Brussels, 2.3.2010, COM (2010) 2020 final.
  • J. Elmeskov, D. Sutherland, Post-crisis debt overhang: growth implications cross countries, Monetary Policy Sovereign Debt and Financial Stability, The New Trilemma, OECD Economics Department, 12.02.2012.
  • J. S. Eminescu, Structure of Government debt in Europe in 2011 upward trend in the EU government debt level continued in 2011, Economy and Finance, Statistic focus 34/2012, Eurostat, 2012.
Typ dokumentu
Identyfikator YADDA

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.