To what Extent do Some Fundamental Concepts of New Institutional Economics Help Explain the Governance Phenomenon?

• Autorzy: Michał Możdżeń

Warianty tytułu

Na ile nowa ekonomia instytucjonalna pozwala wyjaśnić fenomen współzarządzania?

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The paper is an attempt to describe synthetically the relationship between the New Institutional Economics theory and the problem of governance research. The undertaking requires, without doubt, an in-depth research and extensive analysis, taking into account the various concepts developed by New Institutional Economics, and above all used to analyze the phenomenon of governance. Of necessity, the present paper is a far incomplete analysis of the problem, but allows one to present the basic commonalities and differences between the logic of economic analysis and its subject - which in this case is governance. For the purpose of this text, we define governance in accordance with the model of network governance as put forward by Leach et al. (2007) (original abstract)

Tekst stanowi próbę syntetycznego opisu relacji między nurtem nowej ekonomii instytucjonalnej a problemem badawczym współzarządzania. Przedsięwzięcie takie wymaga bez wątpienia dogłębnych badań i rozbudowanego ujęcia, uwzględniającego poszczególne koncepcje wypracowane zarówno po stronie nowej ekonomii instytucjonalnej, jak i przede wszystkim w analizie fenomenu współzarządzania. Z konieczności więc niniejszy tekst ma charakter dalece niekompletnej analizy problemu, jednak pozwala na przedstawienie zasadniczych elementów wspólnych, jak i rozbieżności między logiką analizy ekonomicznej a jej przedmiotem - który w tym wypadku stanowi współzarządzanie. Rozumienie współzarządzania na potrzeby tego tekstu ograniczone jest do modelu współzarządzania sieciowego w ujęciu Leach i in. (2007). (abstrakt oryginalny)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Institutional economics; Transaction cost; State institutions

PL

Ekonomia instytucjonalna; Koszty transakcyjne; Instytucje państwa

• Czasopismo: Zarządzanie Publiczne / Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie
• Rocznik: 2015
• Numer: nr 1 (31)
• Strony: 22--36

Twórcy

autor

Michał Możdżeń

• Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie

Bibliografia

• Acemoglu, D., and Robinson, J. (2012). Why Nations Fail. The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. New York: Crown Publishers.
• Akerlof, G. A. (1970). "The market for 'lemons': Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism", The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3): 488-500.
• Aligica, P. D., and Boettke, P. J. (2010). The Social Philosophies of the Ostroms' Institutionalism, Mercatus Center George Mason University Working Paper.
• Amin, A., and Hausner, J., eds. (1997). Beyond Market and Hierarchy: Interactive Governance and Social Complexity. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
• Ansell, C. (1997). "Symbolic networks: The realignment of the French working class, 1887-1894", American Journal of Sociology, 103(2): 359-90.
• Arrow, K. J. (1951) Social Choice and Individual Values. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
• Arrow, K. J. (1970). Essays in the Theory of Riskbearing. Amsterdam: North-Holland Pub. Co.
• Arrow, K. J. (1987). "Reflections on the Essays", in: G. Feiwel, ed., Arrow and the Foundations of the Theory of Economic Policy. New York: New York University Press.
• Axelrod, R., and Hamilton, W. D. (1981). "The evolution of cooperation", Science, New Series, 211(4489): 1390-1396.
• Becker, G. (1993). "Economic imperialism", Religion & Liberty, 3(2) (interview can be accessed at: http:// www.acton.org/pub/religion-liberty/volume-3-number- 2/economic-imperialism).
• Buchanan, J., and Tullock, G. (1962). The Calculus of Consent. The Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund (edition 1999).
• Chmielewski, P. (2011). Homo Agens. Instytucjonalizm w naukach społecznych. Warszawa: Poltext.
• Coase, R. H. (1937). "The nature of the firm", Economica, 4 (16): 386-405.
• Coase, R. H. (1959). "The Federal Communications Commission", The Journal of Law and Economics, 2: 1-40.
• Coase, R. H. (1960). "The problem of social cost", Journal of Law and Economics, 3: 1-44.
• Coase, R. (2012). "Coase on externalities, the firm, and the state of economics", interview for econtalk. org, 21 May 2012 (http://www.econtalk.org/archives/ 2012/05/coase_on_extern.html).
• Commons, J. R. (1931). "Institutional economics", American Economic Review, 21: 648-657.
• Commons, J. (1968). Legal Foundations of Capitalism. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
• Dahlman, C. J. (1979). "The problem of externality", The Journal of Law and Economics, 22: 141-162.
• Gijsbers, G. (2001). Governance and Institutional Innovation, ISNAR Discussion Paper, No 01-09.
• Hall, P. (1986). Governing the Economy: The Politics of State Intervention in Britain and France. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Hardin, G. (1968). "The tragedy of the commons", Science, 162(3859): 1243-1248.
• Hardt, Ł. (2008). Rozwój ekonomii kosztów transakcyjnych. Od koncepcji do operacjonalizacji. Warszawa: Fundacja Promocji i Akredytacji Kierunków Ekonomicznych.
• Heclo, H. (1978). "Issue networks and the executive establishment", in: A. King, ed., The New American Political System. Washington: American Enterprise Institute.
• Hoffman, R., Ireland, D. (2013). Elinor Ostrom, Institutuions and Governance of the Global Commons, Working Paper, https://dubofromeagm2013.files. wordpress.com/2013/08/ostrom_institutions_commons_ draft_2013_july_22.docx.
• Homans, G. C. (1967). The Nature of Social Science. Boston: Houghton Miff lin Harcourt.
• Jensen, M. C., and Meckling, W. H. (1976). "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure", Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): 305-360.
• Jessop, B. (2007). "Promowanie dobrego rządzenia I ukrywanie jego słabości", Zarządzanie Publiczne, 2(2): 5-26.
• Jones, C., Hesterly, W. S., and Borgatti, S. P. (1997). "A general theory of network governance: Exchange conditions and social mechanisms", The Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 911-924.
• Leach, M., Bloom, G., Ely, A., Nightingale, P., Scoones, I., Shah, E., and Smith, A. (2007). Understanding Governance: Pathways to Sustainability, STEPS Working Paper 2, Brighton: STEPS Centre.
• Lund, C. (2001). Discussing Some Elements of Elinor Ostrom and Jean-Philippe Platteau's Ideas of the 'Commons Dilemma', presentation at the seminar: "Managing Common Resources - What is the Solution", Lund University, 10 September 2001.
• March, J. G., and Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: The Free Press.
• Ménard, C., and Shirley, M. M. (2008). Oxford Handbook of Institutional Economics. Berlin: Springer.
• Ménard, C., and Shirley, M. M. (2014). "The contribution of Douglass North to New Institutional Economics", in: S. Galiani, and I. Sened, eds., Economic Institutions, Rights, Growth, and Sustainability: The Legacy of Douglass North. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• North, D. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• North, D., Wallis, J. J., and Weingast B. R. (2006). A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History, NBER Working Paper No 12795. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
• Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons. The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Ostrom, E. (1997). A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action, Presidential Address, American Political Science Association.
• Ostrom, E. (1999). "Coping with tragedies of the commons", Annual Review of Political Science, 2: 493-535.
• Ostrom, E. (2000). "Collective action and the evolution of social norms", The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3): 137-158.
• Ostrom, E. (2003). "How types of goods and property rights jointly affect collective action", Journal of Theoretical Politics, 15(3): 239-270.
• Ostrom, E. (2010). "Analyzing collective action", Agricultural Economics, 41, Issue Supplement s1: 155-166.
• Ostrom, E., Ahn, T. K. (2007). "The meaning of social capital and its link to collective action", in: G. T. Svendsen, G. L. Svendsen, eds., Handbook on Social Capital. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
• Pierson, P. (2000). "Increasing returns, path dependence and the study of politics", American Political Science Review, 94(2): 251-267.
• Ruiter, D. W. P. (2005). "Is transaction cost economics applicable to public governance?", European Journal of Law and Economics, 20(3): 287-303.
• Shapiro, S. P. (2005). "Agency theory", Annual Review of Sociology, 31: 263-284.
• Simon, H. (1947). Administrative Behavior. New York: MacMillan.
• Tang, S. Y., Mazmanian, D. A., and Zhan, X. (2011). "Understanding collaborative governance from the rational choice perspective", Fudan Public Administrative Review.
• Veblen, T. (2008). Teoria klasy próżniaczej. Warszawa: Muza.
• Williamson, O. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. A Study in the Economics of Internal Organization, New York: Free Press.
• Williamson, O. E. (1979). "Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations", Journal of Law and Economics, 22(2): 233-261.
• Williamson, O. E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press.
• Williamson, O. E. (1991). "Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives", Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2): 219-244.
• Williamson, O. E. (1996). The Mechanisms of Governance. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Williamson, O. E. (1999). "Strategy research: Governance and competence perspectives", Strategic Management Journal, 20(12): 1087-1108.
• Williamson, O. E. (2010). "Transaction cost economics: The natural progression", American Economic Review, 100(3): 673-690.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15678/ZP.2015.31.1.03