Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2015 | 23 | nr 2 | 61--91
Tytuł artykułu

Towards Behaviorally Informed Public Interventions

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Purpose: This article informs readers about the theoretical and practical origins of the behaviorally informed interventions (BIPI), analyzes examples of the BIPI from different policy sectors and strategies they offer for policy and regulatory design, and discusses applications and implications of BIPI for public interventions.

Methodology: This paper is based on a review of literature, as well as an inspection of administrative practices in OECD countries. It encompasses a systematic analysis of scientific papers from the SCOPUS database and a query carried out at the library of George Washington University.

Findings: The traditional approach to public policy research is based on rational choice theory. It offers limited support, because by assuming perfect rationality of policy decisions, it overlooks existence of systematic errors and biases of human decision-making. The authors argue that behaviorally informed public interventions (BIPI) might contribute to improving the effectiveness of a number of public measures - regulation, projects, programs, and even entire policies.

Practical implications: The behavioral approach allows decision-makers to better understand the decisions and behaviors of citizens, as well as to design more effective interventions with minimum effort by adapting the existing solutions to real decision mechanisms of citizens.

Originality: By combining the concepts of traditional approach with the growing behavioral approach, the authors aim to propose a new theoretical framework (BIPI) to be used as a tool for policy design, delivery and evaluation. (original abstract)
Opis fizyczny
  • University of Warsaw, Poland
  • University of Warsaw, Poland
  • Amir, O., Ariely, D., Cooke, A., Dunning, D., Epley, N., Gneezy, U. and Silva, J. (2005). Psychology, behavioral economics, and public policy. Marketing Letters, 16(3-4): 443-454.
  • Ariely, D. (2010). Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions. London: Harper Perennial.
  • Astbury, B. and Leeuw, F.L. (2010). Unpacking black boxes: Mechanisms and theory-building in evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 31(3): 363-381.
  • Barr, M., Mullainathan, S. and Shafir, E. (2013). Behaviorally Informed Regulations. In: E. Shafir (ed.), The Behavioral Foundations of Public Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Baumeister, R.F., and Vohs, K.D. (2007). Encyclopedia of Social Psychology (1 edition.). Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE Publications, Inc.
  • Beggs, J. (2013). Homer economicus or Homer sapiens? Behavioral economics in The Simpsons.
  • Behavioral Insights Team (2012). Annual update 2011-2012. London: Cabinet Office, United Kingdom.
  • Bemelmans-Videc, M.-L. (2007). Introduction. Policy Instruments Choice and Evaluation. In: M.L. Bemelmans-Videc, R. Rist, E. Vedung (eds.), Carrots, Sticks & Sermons. Policy Instruments and Their Evaluation. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
  • Bendor, J. (2010). Bounded Rationality and Politics. Berkeley, London, New York: University of California Press.
  • Cappelli, P. (2014). Les nudges", force de Persuasion. Liberation.
  • Chrabąszcz, R. and Zawicki, M. (2014). Nauki o polityce publicznej. In: M. Zawicki (ed.), Wprowadzenie do nauk o polityce publicznej. Warszawa: Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne.
  • Cialdini, R.B. (2008). Influence: Science and Practice (5th Edition). Allyn and Bacon.
  • Coryn, C., Noakes, L., Westine, C. and Schroter, D. (2011). A systematic review of theory-driven evaluation practice from 1990 to 2009. American Journal of Evaluation, 32(2): 199-226.
  • Cyert, R. and March, J. (1963). Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
  • Datta, S. and Mullainathan, S. (2012). Behavioral design: A new approach to development policy. CGD Policy Paper, 16(November): 1-33.
  • Davies, H., Nutley, S. and Smith, P. (red.) (2009). What works? Evidence-based policy and practice in public services. Bristol: The Policy Press.
  • de Vaus, D. (2006). Overview. In: D. de Vaus (ed.), Research Design. London: Sage Publications.
  • DEA (2010). Nudge, think or shove? Shifting values and attitudes towards sustainability: A briefing for sustainable development practitioners. London.
  • Dolan, P. (2013). Influencing the financial behaviour of individuals: The mindspace way. In: A. Oliver (ed.), Behavioral Public Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Donaldson, S.I. (2007). Program Theory-Driven Evaluation Science: Strategies and Applications. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Falkowski, A. and Zaleśkiewicz, T. (eds.) (2012). Psychologia poznawcza w praktyce. Ekonomia, biznes, polityka. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  • Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G. and O'donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2): 351-401.
  • Groome, D. (1999). An Introduction to Cognitive Psychology: Processes and Disorders (annotated edition edition). London; New York: Psychology Press.
  • Hallsworth, M., Dolan, P., Halpern, D.D., King, D. and Vlaev, I. (2010). MINDSPACE. London: Institute for Government.
  • Hausner, J. (2008). Zarządzanie publiczne. Podręcznik akademicki. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
  • Haynes, L., Service, O. and Goldacre, B. (2012). Test, Learn, Adapt: Developing Public Policy with Randomised Controlled Trials. London: UK Cabinet Office. Behavioral Insight Team.
  • Howlett, M. (2011). Designing Public Policies: Principles and instruments. London, New York: Routledge.
  • Hustwit, G. (2009). Objectified, British documentary movie directed by Hustwit: Plexi Production. Hustwit, G. (2011). Urbanized. [British documentary movie].
  • John, P., Cotterill, S., Richardson, L., Moseley, A., Smith, G., Stoker, G. and Wales, C. (2011). Nudge, Nudge, Think, Think: Using Experiments to Change Civic Behavior. London, New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Jolls, C., Sunstein, C.R. and Thaler, R.H. (2000). A behavioral Approach to law and economics. In: C.R. Sunstein (ed.), Behavioral Law and Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Jones, R., Pykett, J. and Whitehead, M. (2013). Changing Behaviours: On the Rise of the Psychological State. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Just, D. (2013). Introduction to Behavioral Economics. Danvers, MA: Wiley.
  • Kahneman, D. (2013a). Foreword. In: E. Shafir (ed.), The Behavioral Foundations of Public Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Kahneman, D. (2013b). Pułapki myślenia. O myśleniu szybkim i wolnym. Poznań: Media Rodzina.
  • Krawczyk, M. (ed.) (2012). Ekonomia eksperymentalna. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer Polska.
  • Leeuw, F.L. (2003). Reconstructing program theories: Methods available and problems to be solved. American Journal of Evaluation, 24(1): 5-20.
  • Leong, L.C. (2011). Foreword. In: D. Low (ed.), Behavioral Economics and Policy Design: Examples from Singapore. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company.
  • Levitt, B. and March, J. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14: 319-340.
  • Low, D. (2011). Cognition, Choice and Policy Design. In: D. Low (ed.), Behavioral Economics and Policy Design: Examples from Singapore. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company.
  • Lunn, P. (2014). Regulatory Policy and Behavioral Economics. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Ly, K., Mazar, N., Zhao, M. and Soman, D. (2013). A Practitioner's Guide To Nudging. Toronto: Rotman School of Management.
  • Martin, S.J. (2009). Yes!: 50 Scientifically Proven Ways to Be Persuasive (Reprint edition). New York: Free Press.
  • Mitchell Gregory (2005). Libertarian paternalism is an oxymoron. Northwestern University Law Review, 99(3): 1245-1277.
  • Mullainathan, S. and Allcott, H. (2010). Behavior and energy policy. Science, 327: 1204-1205.
  • Munro, A. (2009). Bounded Rationality and Public Policy. A Perspective from Behavioral Economics. Heidelberg. London: Springer.
  • Norman, D. (2013). The Design of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.
  • Nutley, S.M., Walter, I. and Davies, H.T.O. (2007). Using Evidence: How Research Can Inform Public Services. Bristol: Policy Press.
  • OECD (2007). Evidence and education: Linking Research with Policy. Paris: OECD.
  • Olejniczak, K. (2014). Modele logiczne. In: B. Ledzion, K. Olejniczak, and J. Rok (eds.), Jak wzmacniać organizacyjne uczenie się w administracji rządowej. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
  • Olszewski, P. and Xie, L. (2005). Modelling the effects of road pricing on traffic in Singapore. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39(7-9): 755-772.
  • Osman Magda (2015). Does our unconscious rule? The Psychologist. 2(28): 114-117.
  • Pawson, R. (2013). The Science of Evaluation: A Realist Manifesto. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  • Pedersen, A., Nielsen, H.Ø., Christensen, T. and Hasler, B. (2012). Optimising the effect of policy instruments: A study of farmers' decision rationales and how they match the incentives in Danish pesticide policy. Journal of Environmental Management and Planning, 55(8): 1094-1110.
  • Peng, J., Li, H., Miao, D., Feng, X. and Xiao, W. (2013). Five different types of framing effects in medical situations: A preliminary exploration. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal, 15(2): 161-165.
  • Plickert, P. (2014). Regierungsberater Kanzlerin sucht Verhaltensforscher. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung.
  • Rabin, M. (1998). Psychology and economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(1): 11-46.
  • Rutter, T. (2014). What next for the nudge unit? The Guardian. accessed from
  • Saussois, J.M. (2003). Knowledge management in government: An idea whose time has come. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 3(3): 105-136.
  • Schneider, A. and Ingram, H. (1990). Behavioral assumptions of policy tools. The Journal of Politics, 52(2): 510-529.
  • Schwartz, N. (2004). Metacognitive Experiences in Consumer Judgment and Decision Making.
  • Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(4): 332-348.
  • Shafir, E. (2013a). Introduction. In: E. Shafir (ed.), The Behavioral Foundations of Public Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Shafir, E. (ed.) (2013b). The Behavioral Foundations of Public Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Shillabeer, A., Buss, T.F. and Rousseau, D.M. (eds.) (2011). Evidence-Based Public Management: Practices, Issues, and Prospects. Armonk, New York, London: M.E. Sharpe
  • Siadkowski, J. (ed.) (2014) Grywalizacja. Zrób to sam!, Fundacja Orange,
  • Simon, H.A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63(2): 129-138.
  • Simon, H.A. (1997). Administrative Behavior, 4th Edition. New York: The Free Press.
  • Sunstein, C.R. (2014). Why Nudge?: The Politics of Libertarian Paternalism. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
  • Sunstein, C.R. (ed.) (2000). Behavioral Law and Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sześciło, D. (2012). O pomostach między prawem a współczesnymi nurtami zarządzania publicznego. Zarządzanie Publiczne, 4(22): 5-16.
  • Szyszka, A. (2009). Finanse behawioralne. Nowe podejście do inwestowania na rynku kapitałowym. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu.
  • Tatarkiewicz, W. (1998). Historia Filozofii. Filozofia starożytna i średniowieczna. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  • Thaler, R.H. (2009). Opting in vs. opting out. The New York Times.
  • Thaler, R.H. and Benartzi, S. (2004). Save more tomorrow: Using behavioral economics to increase employee saving. Journal of Political Economy, 112(1): 164-187.
  • Thaler, R.H., Sunstein, C.R. and Balz, J.P. (2010). Choice Architecture (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 1583509). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.
  • Thaler, R.H. and Sunstein, C.R. (2009). Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. London: Penguin Books.
  • Thaler, R.H., Sunstein, C.R. and Balz, J. (2013). Choice architecture. In: E. Shafir (ed.), The Behavioral Foundations of Public Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Tucker, J. (2005). Intervention. In: S. Mathison (ed.), Encyclopedia of Evaluation, p. 210. Thousand Oaks, Calif.; London: Sage.
  • Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157): 1124-1131.
  • Tyszka, T. (2010). Decyzje. Perspektywa psychologiczna i ekonomiczna. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
  • Ulen, T. (2012). The lessons of 30 years of law and economics - and the prospects for its future. Polish Yearbook of Law & Economics, 3: 7-19.
  • van der Linden, S. (2013). A response to Dolan. In: A. Oliver (ed.), Behavioral Public Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wai, Y.L. and Yii, D.L. (2011). A behavioral perspective to managing traffic congestion in Singapore. In: Behavioral Economics and Policy Design. Co-published with Civil Service College Singapore.
  • Wendel, S. (2013). Designing for Behavior Change: Applying Psychology and Behavioral Economics. Sebastopol CA, Beijing, Cambridge: O'Reilly Media.
  • Yap, J. (2005) Implementing road and congestion pricing: Lessons from Singapore [Workshop notes]. Implementing sustainable urban travel policies in Japan & other Asia-Pacific countries. Tokyo, 2-3 March.
  • Zaleśkiewicz, T. (2011). Psychologia ekonomiczna. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  • Zielonka, P. (2008). Behawioralne aspekty inwestowania na rynku papierów wartościowych (2nd ed.). Warszawa: CeDeWu.
Typ dokumentu
Identyfikator YADDA

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.