EU Citizenship and EU Entities: New Perspectives for Citizens and Companies

• Autorzy: Agnieszka Guzewicz
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The contemporary European Union needs a stronger sense of identity to overcome its existing crises and divisions. Implementation of common European standards requires that the competing interests of Member States be reconciled in order to find a point of balance between the autonomy of legal systems and the idea of the internal market. EU law is constantly changing, which is reflected in the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union constituting the acquis communautaire. In analysing judgments in the area of the EU citizenship and company law, one might discern a clear tendency of the Court of Justice to accentuate an EU identity, which is a source of rights for citizens or companies, independent of particular Member States' legal orders. EU identity manifests itself most strongly in the institution of EU citizenship, but in recent times the Court of Justice has emphasized the importance of identity also in connection with the operation of companies falling under Article 54(1)of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), which will be the subject of further consideration. (fragment of text)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Citizenship of the European Union; Maastricht Treaty; Company law; Establishment of a company

PL

Obywatelstwo UE; Traktat z Maastricht; Prawo spółek; Zakładanie przedsiębiorstwa

• Czasopismo: Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: 3
• Numer: nr 1
• Strony: 48--58

Twórcy

autor

Agnieszka Guzewicz

• University of Wroclaw

Bibliografia

• Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union [2012] OJ C326/47.
• Łazowski A., Obywatelstwo Unii Europejskiej - uwagi teoretyczne i praktyczne w dziesięć lat po wejściu w życie Traktatu z Maastricht in Piontek E., Zawidzka A. (eds), Szkice z prawa Unii Europejskiej, t. I (Wolters Kluwer 2003), s. 135-136.
• Kowalik-Bańczyk K. in Wróbel A.,(ed), Traktat o funkcjonowaniu Unii Europejskiej. Komentarz do art. 1-89 (Warsaw 2012) 437.
• Schrauwen A., The Future of EU Citizenship: Corrosion of National Citizenship?, (Amsterdam 2009), s. 2, available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1375413
• Jacobs F. G., Citizenship of the European Union-A Legal Analysis, (2007) 13, "European Law Journal", s. 591-610.
• Kochenov D., Ius Tractum of Many Faces: European Citizenship and the Difficult Relationship between Status and Rights,(2009) 15, "Columbia Journal of European Law", s. 172.
• Kostakopoulou D., European Union Citizenship: Writing the Future,(2007) 13, "European Law Journal", s. 623-628.
• Besson S., Utzinger A., Introduction: Future Challenges of European Citizenship-Facing a Wide-Open Pandora's Box, (2007) 13, s. "European Law Journal", s. 574.
• Kostakopoulou D., Ideas, Norms and European Citizenship: Explaining Institutional Change, (2005) 68, "The Modern Law Review", s. 234.
• Cases C-224/98 Marie-Nathalie D'Hoop v Office national de l'emploi [2002] ECR I-06191.
• C-148/02 Carlos Garcia Avello v Belgian State [2003] ECR I-11613.
• Joined Cases C-502/01 and C-31/02 Silke Gaumain-Cerri v Kaufmännische Krankenkasse -Pflegekasse and Maria Barth v Landesversicherungsanstalt Rheinprovinz [2004] ECR I-06483.
• C-499/06 Halina Nerkowska v Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych Oddział w Koszalinie [2008] ECR I-03993.
• C-135/08 Janko Rottman v Freistaat Bayern [2010] ECR I-01449.
• C-34/09 Gerardo Ruiz Zambrano v Office national de l'emploi (ONEm) [2011] ECR I-01177.
• Treaty on European Union [2012] OJ C326/13.
• Article 17 of Treaty establishing the European Community [1997] OJ C340/173.
• Safjan M., Between Mangold and Omega: Fundamental Rights versus Constitutional Identity (2012) 3 Il diritto dell Unione europea, s. 442-449.
• Schrauwen A., European Union Citizenship in the Treaty of Lisbon: Any Change at All?, (2008) 1, "Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law", s. 55-64.
• C-76/05 Herbert Schwarz and Marga Gootjes-Schwarz v Finanzamt Bergisch Gladbach [2007] ECR I-06849 para 87.
• C-209/03 The Queen, on the application of Dany Bidar v London Borough of Ealing and Secretary of State for Education and Skills [2005] ECR I-2119, para 33.
• C-403/03 Egon Schempp v Finanzamt München V [2005] ECR I-06421 paras 17 and 18.
• Kochenov D., A Real European Citizenship; A New Jurisdiction Test; A Novel Chapter in the Development of the Union in Europe, (2011) 18, "Columbia Journal of European Law" s. 75-80.
• Kochenov D, Case C-135/08, Janko Rottmann v. Freistaat Bayern, Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 March 2010, (2010) 47, "Common Market Law Review", s. 1846.
• Cases C-184/99 Rudy Grzelczyk v Centre public d'aide sociale d'Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve [2001] ECR I-6193 para 31.
• Case C-200/02 Kunqian Catherine Zhu and Man Lavette Chen v Secretary of State or the Home Department [2004] ECR I-09925 para 25.
• Murat Dereci and Others v Bundesministerium für Inneres [2011], not yet published, para 62.
• Magnette P., How can one be European? Reflections on the Pillars of European Civic Identity (2007) 13, "European Law Journal", s. 664-679.
• Napierała J., Europejskie prawo spółek (Warsaw 2006), s. 12-13.
• Skibińska E., Swoboda zakładania przedsiębiorstw przez osoby prawne (art. 43-48 TWE) (Warsaw 2008), s. 83-97.
• Cieśliński A., Wspólnotowe prawo gospodarcze (Warsaw 2003), s. 197-198.
• Cases C-378/10 VALE Építési kft [2012], not yet published, para 27.
• C-210/06 CARTESIO Oktató és Szolgáltató bt [2008] ECR I-9641 para 104.
• 81/87 The Queen v H. M. Treasury and Commissioners of Inland Revenue, ex parte Daily Mail and General Trust plc [1988] ECR 5483 para 19.
• Schapira J., Le Tallec G., Blaise J-B., Idot L., Droit européen des affaires, t. II (PUF 1999), s. 568.
• Mustaki G., Engammare V., Droit européen des sociétés (Helbing Lichtenhahn 2009), s. 10.
• Opalski A., Europejskie prawo spółek (Warsaw 2010), s. 90.
• Cozian M., Viandier A., Deboissy F., Droit des sociétés (Litec 2007), s. 106.
• Korom V., Metzinger P., Freedom of Establishment for Companies: The European Court of Justice Confirms and Refines its Daily Mail Decision in the Cartesio Case C-210/06, (2009) 6, "European Company and Financial Law Review", s. 150.
• Dubovizkaja E., Uberseering-Rechtsprechung: Gerichtliche Klarstellung zur Niederlassungsfreiheit von Gesellschaften (2003) 12, "GmbH-Rundschau", s. 698.
• Szydło M., The right of Companies to Cross-Border Conversion under the TFEU Rules on Freedom of Establishment (2010) 3, "European Company and Financial Law Review", s. 429.
• Guzewicz A., Transgraniczne połączenia oraz przekształcenia spółek w świetle acquis communautaire in Frąckowiak J. (ed), Kodeks spółek handlowych po dziesięciu latach (Wrocław 2013), s. 638-641.
• Schouten J., Continuation of the Legal Entity that has been Dissolved in a European Perspective (2008) 5, "European Company Law", s. 13-19.
• Menjucq M., La mobilité des sociétés dans l'espace européen (LGDJ 1997).
• Decocq A., Decocq G., Droit européen des affaires (L.G.D.J. 2003).
• Tafani S., Caruso R., Il nuovo diritto europeo delle società di capitali (Istituto Poligrafico dello Stato 2005).
• Grundmann S., European Company Law. Organization, Finance and Capital Markets (Intersentia 2007).
• Andenas M., Wooldridge F., European Comparative Company Law (Cambridge University Press 2009).
• Vossestein G-J., Modernization of European Company Law and Corporate Governance. Some Considerations on its Legal Limits (Kluwer Law International 2010).
• Bernitz U., Ringe W-G. (eds), Company Law and Economic Protectionism. New Challenges to European Integration (Oxford University Press 2010).
• Pederzini E., Percorsi di diritto societario europeo (Giappichelli 2011).
• C-208/00 Überseering BV v Nordic Construction Company Baumanagement GmbH (NCC) [2002] ECR I-09919.
• C-411/03 SEVIC Systems AG [2005] ECR I-10805.
• Conac P.-H., La CJUE reconnaît le transfert international de siège et ouvre la voie à une directive (2012) 44, "Recueil Le Dalloz" s. 3009-3013.
• Mastrullo T., La consécration du droit à la transformation transfrontalière des sociétés dans l'Union européenne (2012) 38, "La Semaine Juridique - entreprise et affaires", s. 23-26.
• Mpindi I. D., Mobilité des sociétés dans l'espace européen (2012) 74, "Revue Lamy droit desaffaires", s. 15.
• Vermeylen J., Arrêt «VALE Építési »: la mobilité transfrontalière du siège statutaire est-elle un droit? (2012) 9, "Journal de droit européen" s. 276-278.
• Frąckowiak J., Adresaci norm prawa prywatnego - podmioty stosunków cywilnoprawnych in Gudowski J., Weitz K. (eds), Aurea praxis, aurea theoria. Księga pamiątkowa ku czci Porfesora Tadeusza Erecińskiego, t. II (Warsaw 2011), s. 2263-2278.
• Błaszczyk P., Glosa do wyroku TS z dnia 12 lipca 2012 r., C-378/10 (2012) 11, "Europejski Przegląd Sądowy", s. 43.
• Vossestein G-J., Transfer of the Registered Office: The European Commission's Decision Not to Submit a Proposal for a Directive (2008) 4, "Utrecht Law Review", s. 58-61.
• http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/consultations/2013/seat-transfer/index_en.htm
• http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/company/modern/index_en.htm