PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2015 | nr 380 Unia Europejska w 10 lat po największym rozszerzeniu | 60--81
Tytuł artykułu

Ten Years After the Accession of Central and Eastern Europe Countries in the EU: Evaluation in Comparison to the Transition in Former Soviet Republic

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Dziesięć lat po przystąpieniu krajów centralnej i wschodniej Europy do Unii Europejskiej: porównanie z przemianami w byłym Związku Radzieckim
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
This paper deals with the process which happened in ten countries, former communist economies of Central and Eastern Europe (CEEC), which joined the European Union (EU) between 2004 and 2007. Recession was severe both in CEEC and in the former Soviet Republics (FSR) after the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 and the dissolution of USSR in 1991. The transformation was very deep both from an economic and political perspective. However, I argue, during the transformation and the economic recovery CEEC were favored by EU conditionality and membership, while FSR were not involved this process. EU membership might have been the crucial factor which influenced the transition in CEEC and which determined better performance. Moreover, political transition (concerning civil rights, political liberties, and traditional liberal values) was more successful in CEEC than in FSR. In this respect, the role played by the EU, was crucial for New Member States.(original abstract)
Artykuł dotyczy procesu przystąpienia do Unii Europejskiej w latach 2004 i 2007 dziesięciu krajów Europy Środkowej i Wschodniej (CEEC), byłych gospodarek komunistycznych. Recesja, jaka dotknęła w wyniku transformacji zarówno gospodarki krajów Europy Środkowej i Wschodniej po upadku muru berlińskiego w 1989 r., jak i byłych republik radzieckich (FSR) po rozpadzie ZSRR w 1991 r., była bardzo głęboka z punktu widzenia gospodarczego i politycznego. Autor opracowania twierdzi, że kraje Europy Środkowej i Wschodniej były faworyzowane w okresie transformacji i ożywienia gospodarczego przez warunki ich członkostwa w UE, natomiast FSR nie były zainteresowane uczestnictwem w tym procesie. Bardzo prawdopodobne jest, że członkostwo w UE było istotnym czynnikiem, który wpłynął na proces transformacji w Europie Środkowej i Wschodniej oraz przyczynił się do wzrostu wydajności. Co więcej, zmiany polityczne (w zakresie praw obywatelskich, swobód politycznych i tradycyjnych wartości liberalnych) odniosły w CEEC większy sukces niż w FSR. W związku z tym rola, jaką odegrała UE, była kluczowa dla nowych państw członkowskich.(abstrakt oryginalny)
Twórcy
  • Roma Tre University
Bibliografia
  • Andreff W., (1998), "Nominal and Real Convergence - At what speed?" in J. van Braband (ed.) The European Union, the transition economies and the remaking Europe, Rowman and Littlefield, Bourdler.
  • Apolte T., (2010), Democracy and Prosperity in Two Decades of Transition, Munster University Working Papers, Discussion Paper No. 26.
  • Åslund A., (2001), The myth of Output Collapse after Communism. Carnegie Endowment, Working Paper No. 18, Washington D.C.
  • Balcerowicz L., (1993), Common Fallacies in the Debate on the Economic Transition in Central and Eastern Europe, EBRD Working Paper No.11.
  • Berend I, (2006), An Economic History of Twentieth-Century Europe, Cambridge University Press.
  • Boggio L., Serravalli G., (2003), Lo sviluppo economico. Fatti, teorie, politiche. Bologna, Il Mulino.
  • Carlucci F., Cavone F., (2004), La Grande Europa, Franco Angeli, Milano.
  • Dabrowski M., (2001), Ten Years of Polish Economic Transition, 1989-1999, [in:] Transition: The First Decade, eds. M. Blejer, M., MIT Press, pp. 121-152.
  • De Filippis F., (2002), Le vie della globalizzazione: la questione agricola nel WTO, FrancoAngeli, Rome.
  • De Vincenti C., (2002), La Grande Trasformazione: una chiosa a Nuti, Dipartimento di Economia Pubblica, Università La Sapienza, Mimeo, Roma.
  • EBRD, Statistics database available at www.ebrd.com.
  • Economist Intelligent Unit, Country Reports: Czech Republic, Poland and Hungary, London 1989, 2001.
  • Eurostat, statistics database, available at http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu.
  • European Commission (online database) Enlargement Research Bulletin, Press corner.
  • Falcetti E., Raiser M., Sanfey P., (2000), Defying the odds: initial conditions, reforms and growth in the first decade of transition, EBRD Working Paper No. 55.
  • Freedom in the World 2009: The Annual Survey of Political Rights and Civil Liberties, (2009), Freedom House, New York.
  • Gomulka S., (1995), The IMF-Supported Programs of Poland and Russia: Principles, Errors and Results, "Journal of Comparative Economics" No. 20 (3), pp. 316-345.
  • Holscher J., Gabrisch H., (2006), The Failures and Successes of Economic Transition - The European Experience, Palgrave, London, New York.
  • Huntington, S.P., (1991). Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century, Norman, University of Oklahoma Press.
  • Kolodko G., Nuti M., (1997), The Polish Alternative, Working Paper, UNU/WIDER.
  • Kornai J., (2006), The Great Transformation of Central Eastern Europe. Success and Disappointment, "Economics of Transition", Volume 14 (2), pp. 207-244.
  • Lin J.Y., (2005), Viability, Economic Transition and Reflection on Neoclassical Economics, "Kyklos", No. 58(2), pp. 239-264.
  • Lipset S.M., (1959), Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy'.
  • Litwack, J., Qian Y., (1998), Balanced or Unbalanced Development: Special Economic Zones As Catalysts for Transition, "Journal of Comparative Economics", No. 26(1): 1-25.
  • Manzocchi S., Beatrice P., (2001a), Allargamento a est dell'Ue: gli effetti sul mercato dei beni, Working Paper, University of Perugia and Centro Studio Confindustria, Perugia-Rome.
  • Manzocchi S., Beatrice P., (2001b), L'allargamento a est dell'Ue, l'impatto sugli IDE, Working Paper, University of Perugia and Centro Studio Confindustria, Perugia-Rome.
  • Markowski S., Jackson S. (1993), The Attractiveness of Poland to Foreign Direct Investors, Polish Policy Research Group, Warsaw University, Working Paper No. 24.
  • Møller, J., Skaaning S.E., (2009), The Three Worlds of Post Communism: Revisiting Deep and Proximate Explanations, "Democratization", No. 16:2, p. 298-322.
  • Montalbano, P. (2002) "Analisi dei Flussi Potenziali di Interscambio Commerciale nel Mercato Comune Paneuropeo", CIDEM Working Paper n. 1, University of La Sapienza, Rome.
  • Myant M., Drahokoupil J., (2010), Transition economies: Political Economy in Russia, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia, Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken.
  • Nuti D.M., (2001), I Sistemi Economici Post-Comunisti, ovvero, 2001, Odissea nella Transizione, paper presented at the 2001 Annual Conference SIE, Roma.
  • Prausello F., (2003), The Economics of EU Enlargement, Franco Angeli, Milano.
  • Przeworski A., Alvarez M., Cheibub J.A., Limongi F., (2008), Democracy and Development. Political Institutions and Wee-Being in the World, 1950-1990, Cambridge University Press, New York.
  • Rodrik D., (1999), Making Openness Work, Washington, DC: John Hopkins University Press.
  • Rodrik D., (2004), Rethinking Growth Policies in Developing World, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Rodrik D., (2008), One Economics, Many Recipes: Globalization, Institutions, and Economic Growth, Norton, New York, London.
  • Sala-i-Martin X., (1996), The classical approach to convergence analysis "Economic Journal", 106(437): 1019-1036.
  • Sachs J., (1991), Accelerating Privatisation in Eastern Europe: the Case of Poland, The World Bank Economic Review, No. 6, pp. 15-31.
  • Sarajevs V., Pankki S., Tutkimuslaitos S., (2001) Convergence of European transition economies and the EU : what do the data show Helsinki : Bank of Finland, Intstitute for Economies in Transition, BOFIT, 2001.
  • Schimmelfennig F., Scholtz H., (2008), EU Democracy Promotion in the European Neighbourhood. Political Conditionality, Economic Development and Transnational Exchange. "European Union Politics" Vol. 9 (2), pp. 187-215.
  • Svejnar J., (2002). Assistance to the Transition Economies. Were there alternatives? The William Davidson Institute WP, University of Michigan.
  • Trade and Transition, (2000), ed. A. MacBean, Frank Cass, London.
  • Transition Report (2001, 2004, 2009, 2013), EBRD, London.
  • Tridico P., (2007), Institutions, Human Development and Economic Growth in transition Economies, "European Journal of Development Research" Vol. 19, No. 4.
  • Tridico P., (2011), Institutions, Human Development and Economic Growth in Transition Economies, Palgrave Macmillan, London.
  • Way L., (2008), The Real Causes of the Color Revolutions, "Journal of Democracy" Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 55-69.
  • Weresa M., (1999), Foreign Direct Investments and Trade Patterns: Theory and Evidence from Poland, paper presented to the workshop: Poland and the Transformation in Europe: The role of FDI, School of Slavonic and East European Studies, University of London.
  • World Bank, (1996), World Development Report: From Plan to Market., Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171375553

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.