O etycznych, strategicznych i instytucjonalnych uwarunkowaniach społecznie odpowiedzialnych zachowań przedsiębiorstw

• Autorzy: Robert Kudłak

Warianty tytułu

On Ethical, Strategic and Institutional Conditions Determining Socially Responsible Corporate Behavior

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

Chociaż zainteresowanie badaczy ideą Społecznej Odpowiedzialności Biznesu sięga lat 40. poprzedniego wieku, to wciąż brak jest między nimi zgody odnośnie czynników determinujących społecznie odpowiedzialne zachowania przedsiębiorstw. Naukowcy sięgają po argumenty o charakterze etycznym, strategicznym oraz instytucjonalnym, które w ich mniemaniu wyjaśniają tego typu zachowania podmiotów gospodarczych. Niniejszy artykuł oferuje przegląd oraz dyskusję prac, które odnoszą się do trzech wymienionych grup czynników. (abstrakt oryginalny)

EN

Despite the fact that the academic interests concerning Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) reach as far as the 40s. of the previous century, the drivers of corporate responsible behavior remain ambiguous and disputable. Scholars employed ethical, strategic and institutional arguments in order to explain socially and environmentally conscious conduct. The present article reviews and discusses the existing studies attempting to apply above mentioned types of arguments standing behind CSR. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Etyka; Społeczna odpowiedzialność biznesu; Zachowania przedsiębiorstw

EN

Ethics; Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR); Enterprise behaviour

• Czasopismo: Marketing i Rynek
• Rocznik: 2015
• Numer: nr 5 (CD)
• Strony: 652--664

Twórcy

autor

Robert Kudłak

• Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu

Bibliografia

• Aguilera, R.V., Jackson, G. (2003). The cross-national diversity of corporate governance. Dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review, 28, 447-465.
• Albinger, H. S., Freeman, S. J. (2000). Corporate social performance and attractiveness as an employer to different job seeking populations. Journal of Business Ethics, 28(3), 243-253.
• Andrews, K.R. (1971). The concepts of corporate strategy. New York: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
• Barnard, C.I. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Baron, D. (2001). Theories of strategic nonmarket participation: Majority-rule and executive institutions. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 10, 7-45.
• Becchetti, L., Ciciretti, R. (2009). Corporate social responsibility and stock market performance. Applied Financial Economics, 19(16), 1283-1293.
• Campbell, J. T., Eden, L., Miller, S. R. (2012). Multinationals and corporate social responsibility in host countries: Does distance matter? Journal of International Business Studies, 43(1), 84-106.
• Campbell, L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946-967.
• Clemens B. (2006). Economic Incentives and Small Firms: Does It Pay to Be Green? Journal of Business Research 59(4), 492-500.
• Dahan, N.M., Doh, J.P., Oetzel, J., Yaziji, M. (2010). Corporate-NGO collaboration: co-creating new business models for developing markets. Long Range Planning, 43(2), 326-342.
• den Hond, F., de Bakker, F.G.A. (2007). Ideologically motivated activism: how activist groups influence corporate social change activities. Academy of Management Review, 32, 901-924.
• Doh, J.P., Guay, T.R. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, public policy and NGO activism in Europe and the United States: An institutional-stakeholder perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 47-73.
• Drucker Peter, F. (1954). The practice of management. New York: Harper and Row Publishers.
• El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C.C., Mishra, D.R. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(9), 2388-2406.
• Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Marshfield, MA: Pitman Publishing Inc.
• Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, September 13, 33.
• García-Sánchez, I. M., Rodríguez-Ariza, L., Frías-Aceituno, J. V. (2013). The cultural system and integrated reporting. International Business Review, 22(5), 828-838.
• Gifford, B., Kestler, A., Anand, S. (2010). Building local legitimacy into corporate social responsibility: Gold mining firms in developing nations. Journal of World Business, 45(3), 304-311.
• Greening, D. W., Turban, D. B. (2000). Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business & Society, 39(3), 254-280.
• Henri, J.F., Journeault, M. (2010). Eco-control: The influence of management control systems on environmental and economic performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1), 63-80.
• Husted, B. W., Allen, D. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in the multinational enterprise: Strategic and institutional approaches. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 838-849.
• Ioannou, I., Serafeim, G. (2012). What drives corporate social performance; The role of nation-level institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(9), 834-864.
• Iraldo, F., Testa, F., Frey, M. (2009). Is an environmental management system able to influence environmental and competitive performance? The case of the eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS) in the European Union. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(16), 1444-1452.
• Jacobs, B.W., Singhal, V.R., Subramanian, R. (2010). An empirical investigation of environmental performance and the market value of the firm. Journal of Operations Management, 28(5), 430-441.
• King A., Lenox M. (2002). Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction. Management Science, 48(2), 289-299.
• King A., Lenox M. (2000). Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry's responsible care program. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 698-717.
• Klassen R.D., McLaughlin C.P. (1996). Impact of environmental management on firm performance. Management Science, 42(8), 1199-1214.
• Kolk, A. (2010). Trajectories of sustainability reporting by MNCs. Journal of World Business, 45(4), 367-374.
• Konar S., Cohen M.A. (2001). Does the market value environmental performance? Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(2), 281-289.
• Kudłak, R. (2008). Realizacja koncepcji zrównoważonego rozwoju poprzez systemy zarządzania środowiskowego w przedsiębiorstwach w Polsce. Poznań: Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
• Kudłak, R. (2014). Critical insights from the corporate environmentalism-competitiveness investigations. Management of Environmental Quality, 25(2), 111-131.
• Lai, C. S., Chiu, C. J., Yang, C. F., Pai, D. C. (2010). The effects of corporate social responsibility on brand performance: the mediating effect of industrial brand equity and corporate reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(3), 457-469.
• Margolis, J. D., Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268-305.
• Matten, D., Moon, J. (2008). "Implicit" and "explicit" CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33 (2), 404-424.
• Melo, T., Galan, J. I. (2011). Effects of corporate social responsibility on brand value. Journal of Brand Management, 18(6), 423-437.
• Orlitzky M., Schmidt F., Rymes S. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 402-411.
• Peloza, J. (2009). The challenge of measuring financial impacts from investments in corporate social performance. Journal of Management, 35, 1518-1541.
• Reimann, F., Ehrgott, M., Kaufmann, L., Carter, C.R. (2012). Local stakeholders and local legitimacy: MNEs' social strategies in emerging economies. Journal of International Management, 18(1), 1-17.
• Reinhardt, F.L. (1999). Down to Earth. Applying Business Principles to Environmental Management. Bostom, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
• Sarkis, J., Cordeiro, J.J. (2001). An empirical evaluation of environmental efficiencies and firm performance: Pollution prevention versus end-of-pipe practice. European Journal of Operational Research, 135(1), 102-113.
• Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in organizations. New York: Harper and Row Publishers.
• Simon, H. A. (1965). Administrative behavior. New York: Free Press.
• Stites, J. P., Michael, J. H. (2011). Organizational commitment in manufacturing employees: Relationships with corporate social performance. Business & Society, 50(1), 50-70.
• Surroca, J., Tribo, J., Zahra, S. (2012). Stakeholder pressure on MNEs and the transfer of socially irresponsible practices to subsidiaries. Academy of Management Journal, 56(2), 549-572.
• Teegen, H., Doh J. P., Vachani S. (2004). The importance of nongovernmental organizations in global governance and value creation: an international business research agendas. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(6), 463-483.
• Wagner M., Van Phu N., Azamahou T., Wehrmeyer W. (2002). The relationship between the environmental and economic performance of firms: An empirical analysis of the European paper industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 9(3), 133-146.
• Waldman, D. A., de Luque, M. S., Washburn, N., House, R. J., Adetoun, B., Barrasa, A., Wilderom, C. P. (2006). Cultural and leadership predictors of corporate social responsibility values of top management: a GLOBE study of 15 countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 823-837.
• Whitley, R. (1999). Divergent capitalisms: The social structuring and change of business systems. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.