Reward Administration System Enhancing Organizational Commitment: An Islamic Viewpoint

• Autorzy: Noriszura Ismail , Ansar Asnawi Ahmad Anuar , Mohamad Sabri Haron Haron , Razaleigh Muhamat Kawangit
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This aim of this study is to examine the relationship between reward administration system and organizational commitment. A survey method was employed to gather self-report questionnaires from employees in Malaysian private institutions of higher learning. The outcomes of SmartPLS path model analysis showed two important findings: first, communication was positively and significantly correlated with organizational commitment. Second, participation was positively and significantly correlated with organizational commitment. This result demonstrates that the reward administration system does act as an important predictor of organizational commitment in the studied organizations. Further, this study provides discussion, implications and conclusion(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Communication; Research results; Organisation diagnosis

PL

Komunikowanie; Wyniki badań; Diagnozowanie organizacji

• Czasopismo: International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences (ILSHS)
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: 49
• Strony: 155--167

Twórcy

autor

Noriszura Ismail

• Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Faculty of Economics & Management

autor

Ansar Asnawi Ahmad Anuar

• Universiti Kebangsaan, Malaysia

autor

Mohamad Sabri Haron Haron

• Centre for General Studies, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

autor

Razaleigh Muhamat Kawangit

• Faculty of Islamic Studies, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

Bibliografia

• Appelbaum, S.H., & Mackenzie, L. (2000). Compensation in the year 2000: Performance based reward Health Manpower Management, 22 (3): 31-39.
• Belfield, R., & Marsden, D. (2003). Performance pay, monitoring environments, and establishment performance. International Journal of Manpower, 24 (4): 452-471.
• Bergmann, T.J., & Scarpello, V.G. (2002). Compensation decision making. United States: South-Western Thomson Learning.
• Bies, R.J., Sharpiro, D.L., & Cummings, L.L. (1988). Causal accounts and managing organizational conflict: is it enough to say it's not my fault? Communication Research, 15: 381-399.
• Chang, E., & Hahn, J. (2006). Does pay-for-performance enhance perceived distributive justice for collectivistics employees? Personnel Review, 35 (4): 397-412.
• Cook, T.D. and Campbell, D.T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis for Field Settings. Rand McNally, Chicago, Illinois.
• Coyle-Shapiro, J.A-M., Morrow, P.C., Richardson, R., & Dunn, S.R. (2002). Using profit sharing to enhance employee attitudes: A longitudinal examination of the effects on trust and commitment. Human Resource Management, 41 (4): 423-439.
• Cresswell, J.W. (2014). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. London: SAGE publications.
• Cropanzano, R., Byrne, Z. S., Bobocel, D. R., & Rupp, D. R. (2001). Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58: 164-209.
• Folger, R., Konovsky, M.A., & Cropanzano, R. (1992). A due process metaphor for performance appraisal. Research in Organizational Behavior, 3: 129-177.
• Foster, D.P., Stine, B., & Waterman, R. (1998). Business analysis using regression: A casebook.US: Springer-Verlag.
• Gomez-Mejia, L.R. & Balkin, D.B. (1992a). Compensation, organizational strategy, and firm performance. Cincinnati, OH: South Western Publishing Co.
• Gomez-Mejia, L.R. & Balkin, D.B. (1992b). The determinants of faculty pay: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 35 (5): 921-955.
• Greenberg, J. (2003). Creating unfairness by mandating fair procedures: The hidden words of a pay-for-performance plan. Human Resource Management Review, 13: 41-57.
• Henderson, R.I. (2009). Compensation management in a knowledge based-world. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
• Ismail, I., Hock, W.K., & Sulaiman, S. (2007). Relationship between Performance based reward Features and Job Satisfaction: Does Interactional Justice Act as a Mediating Role? The seventh AAM International Conference, 2,495-503, May 22-24, 2007, Science University of Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia.
• Ismail, A., Guatleng, O., Cheeking, T., Ibrahim, Z., Ajis, M.N., & Dollah, N.F. (2009).The indirect effect of distributive justice in the relationship between pay structure and work attitudes and behavior. European Journal of Social Sciences, 11 (2): 234-248.
• John C. Hafer & Thomas N. Martin (2006). Job involvement or affective commitment: A sensitivity analysis study of apathetic employee mobility. Institute of Behavirol and Applied Management.
• Kamus Dewan. (2005). 4th ed. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
• Lawler, E.D. (2000). Rewarding Excellence: Pay Strategies for the New Economy. California: Jossey-Bass.
• Lawler, E.E. (1995). Choosing an involvement strategy. Academy of Management Executive, 2: 197-203.
• Lawler, E.E., Ledford, G., & Chang, L. (1993). Who uses skill-based pay, and why. Compensation and Benefits Review, March-April: 22-26.
• Lee, C., Law, K.S., & Bobko, P. (1999). The importance of justice perceptions on pay effectiveness: A two-year study of a skill-based pay plan. Journal of Management, 25 (6): 851-873.
• McCausland, W.D., Pouliakas, K. & Theodossiou, I. (2005). Some are punished and some are rewarded. A study of the impact of performance pays on job satisfaction. International Journal of Manpower, 26 (7/8): 636-659.
• McShane, S.L. & Von Glinow, M.A. (2005).Organizational Behavior. Irwin: McGraw- Hill.
• Milkovich, G.T. & Newman J.M. (2014). Compensation. New York: McGraw Hill.
• Money, R.B., & Graham, J.L. (1999). Salesperson performance, pay and job satisfaction: Test of a model using data collected in the United States and Japan. Journal of International Business Studies, 30: 149-172.
• Nunally, J.C., & Bernstein, I.H. (1994).Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw- Hill.
• O'Malley, M. (2000). Creating commitment. John Wiley & Sons. Chichester.
• Oxford Dictionary of Islam, (2004).
• Pettijohn, C.E., Pettijohn, L.S., & d'Amico, M. (2001). Charateristics of performance appraisals and their impact on sales force satisfaction. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12 (2): 127-146.
• Sekaran, U. (2000). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
• Shaw, J.D., Duffy, M.K., Jenkins, G.D., & Gupta,, N. (1999). Positive and negative affect, signal sensitivity, and pay satisfaction. Journal of Management, 25 (2): 189-206.
• Sharon Kaur & Garib Singh (2009). A study on employee participation in decision making. Unitar e-journal, 5(1)
• Skarlicki, D. P., & Folger, R. (1997). Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82: 434-443.
• The Quran. (1997). Arabic Text with Corresponding English Meanings, Riyadh, Abulqasim Publishing House.
• Vroom, V.H. (1964). Work and Motivation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
• Warr, P.B., Cook, J. & Wall, T.D. (1979). Scales for the Measurement of Some Work Attitudes and Aspects of Psychological Well-Being. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 52: 129-148.
• Wetzels, M., Oderkerken-Schroder, G. & Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS Path Modelling for Assesssing Hierchical Construct Models: Guidance and Empirical Illustration. Management Information System (MIS) Quarterly, 33(1): 177-195.
• Zeeshan Khan, Hina Ali, Nadeem Ehsan & Ebtisam Mirza (2010). Impact of goal clarity on organizational commitment in telecommunication organizations of Pakistan.