Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2015 | 8 | nr 1 | 7--18
Tytuł artykułu

How do Inter-institutional Teams Succeed? A Case of National Project

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Considering phenomenon of inter-institutional collaboration, the paper aims to investigate the issues of inter-institutional collaboration in Lithuanian public organizations. The paper is based on the study of collaboration aspects relevant to the project implemented by the Lithuanian Republic Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Based on theoretical discussion related to the success of project implementation and team work, two studies were conducted. Firstly, a sample comprised of seven project managers expressed the assumptions about decision-making process, obstacles of project implementation and measures for efficiency. Secondly, 65 responses were collected from project participants representing different public institutions. The results revealed that inter-institutional projects in public organizations are still characterized as following traditional and strictly hierarchic structure. The project leaders underestimate the potential of project group members and do not involve them into the decision-making process. The findings let us develop recommendations for managers and policy makers involved into inter-institutional projects. (original abstract)
Opis fizyczny
  • Mykolas Romeris University, Vilnius, Lithuania
  • Vilnius Gediminas Technical University Vilnius, Lithuania
  • Riga Technical University, Riga, Latvia
  • Ahola, T., Laitinen, E., Kujala, J.,Wikstrom, K. (2008), Purchasing strategies and value creation in industrial turnkey projects. International Journal of Project Management, 26 (1) pp. 87-94
  • Ambrus, A.; Greiner, B., Pathak, P. (2009), Group versus individual decision-making: is there a shift? Economic Working Papers, No. 0091, p.37.
  • Andersen, E.S., Jessen, S.A. (2000), Project evaluation scheme: a tool for evaluating project status and predicting project results. Project Management Journal 6(1), 61-69.
  • Bechky, B.A. (2006), Gaffers, gofers, and grips: role-based coordination in temporary organizations. Organization Science, 17 (1) (2006), pp. 3-21.
  • Cooke-Davies, T. (2002), The "real" success factors on projects. International Journal of Project Management 20, 185-190.
  • Davis, K. (2014), Different stakeholder groups and their perceptions of project success. International Journal of Project Management 32, 189-201.
  • De Dreu, C.K.W., Weingart, L.R. (2003), Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 88(4), 741-749.
  • Diallo, A., Thuillier, D. (2005), The success of international projects, trust and communication: an African perspective. International Journal of Project Management 23(3), 237-252.
  • Drach-Zahavy, A. (2011), Interorganizational teams as boundary spanners: The role of team diversity, boundedness, and extrateam links. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 20(1), 89-118.
  • Goulding, A. Walton G., Stephens D. (2012), The Importance of Political and Strategic Skills for UK Library Leaders, Australian Library Journal, 61(2), 105-118.
  • Harvey, S., Peterson, R.S., Anand, N. (2014), The Process of Team Boundary Spanning in Multi-Organizational Contexts. Small Group Research 1-33.
  • Jinadasa D.K., Perera H. S. C., Samarasinghe G. D. (2011), Succsess Factors Leading to Business Growth of Micro Level Apparel Manufactures in Gampaha District, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Business Management, Vol 8.
  • Jones, N.; Thomas, P.; Rudd, L. (2004), Collaborating for mental health services in Wales: a process evaluation. Public Administration 82, 109-121.
  • Judgev, K.; Muller, R. (2005), A retrospective look at our evolving understanding of project success. Project Management Journal 36(4), 19-31.
  • Kerzner, H. (1987), In search of excellence in project management. Journal of Systems Management 38(2), 30-40.
  • Khang D. B., Moe T. L. (2008), Success Criteria and factors for International Development Projects: A Life Cycle-based Framework. Project Management Journal 39 (1), 72-84.
  • Korsakiene, R. (2009), The innovative approach to relationships with customers. Journal of Business Economics and Management 10(1), pp. 53-60.
  • Koskinen, K.U., Pihlanto, P., Vanharanta, H. (2003), Tacit knowledge acquisition and sharing in a project work context. International Journal of Project Management 21, 281-290.
  • Kotlarsky, J., Oshri, I. (2005), Social ties, knowledge sharing and successful collaboration in globally distributed system development projects. European Journal of Information Systems 14(1), 3748.
  • Levering, R., Ligthart, R., Noorderhaven , N., Oerlemans, L. (2013), Continuity and change in interorganizational project practices: The Dutch shipbuilding industry, 1950-2010. International Journal of Project Management 31(5), pp. 735-747.
  • Lunenburg F.C. (2010), Group Decision-making. National Forum of Teacher Education Journal Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 1-9.
  • Palinkas, L.A., Fuentes, D., Finno, M., Garcia, A.R., Holloway, I.W., Chamberlain, P. (2014), Inter-Organizational Collaboration in the Implementation of Evidence-based Practices Among Public Agencies Serving Abused and Neglected Youth. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 41(1), pp. 74-85.
  • Phelan, T.M. (2005), The impact of effectiveness and efficiency on project success. Technology Management: A Unifying Discipline for Melting the Boundaries, pp. 381-391 D0I:10.1109/PIC-MET.2005.1509715.
  • Piercy, N., Phillips, W.; Lewis, M. (2013), Change management in the public sector: the use of cross-functional teams. Production Planning & Control: The Management of Operations 24 (10-11), pp. 976-987.
  • Pinto, J.K., Slevin, D.P. (2014), Critical success factors across the project life cycle. Project Management Journal 67-75.
  • Raisiené A.G. (2011,) Advantages and limitations of integrated management system: the theoretical viewpoint. Socialinès technologijos : mokslo darbai = Social technologies: research papers, 1(1), pp. 25-36.
  • Tadaki, M., Tremewan, C. (2013), Reimagining internationalization in higher education: international consortia as a transformative space? Studies in Higher Education 38(3), pp. 367-387.
  • Thamhain, H.J. (2004), Linkages of project environment to performance: lessons for team leadership.
  • International Journal of Project Management 22(7), pp. 533-544.
  • Turner, R., Zolin, R. (2012), Forecasting Success on Large Projects: Developing Reliable Scales to Predict Multiple Perspectives by Multiple Stakeholders over Multiple Time Frames. Project Management Journal 43(5), pp. 87-99.
  • Wang, E.; Chou, H.W., Jiang, J. (2005), The impacts of charismatic leadership style on team cohe-siveness and overall performance during ERP implementation. International Journal of Project Management 23(3), pp. 173-180.
  • Wijepala U.S., Wijesundara T. (2011), The Entrepreneurial Management Leadership And Organizational Success - A Socio-Management Study: The Case Of Lakshmi Apparel Garment Factory, Maharagama, Sri Lanka, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Business Management, Vol 8.
  • Yang I. (2014), What makes an effective team? The role of trust (dis)confirmation in team development. European Management Journal 32(6), pp. 858-869.
  • Yang L.R., Huang C.F., Wu K.S. (2011), The association among project manager's leadership style, teamwork and project success. International Journal of Project Management 29(3), pp. 258267.
Typ dokumentu
Identyfikator YADDA

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.