Cross-cultural Differences in Metacognitive Self
The main aim of this study is to investigate the differences between levels of metacognitive self among cultural groups. Metacognitive self is a new concept meaning the level of insight into own biases. We focus on individual versus collective societies as well as the core characteristics of the metacognitive self. Our results indicate better self - insight among collectivistic nations such as Vietnam, Japan, China and India in comparison to individualistic countries (USA, England, Spain). We also studied the level of meta- cognitive self among participants from Poland, the country undergoing socio - economic transition from collectivistic to individualistic society. Future studies should expand the investigation to include more collectivistic and individualistic nations, and countries undergoing transitions. (original abstract)
- Bar-Tal, Y., Raviv, A., Spitzer, A. (1999), The need and ability to achieve cognitivestructuring. Individual differences that moderate the effect of stress on information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1, 33-51.
- Baumeister, R.F., Vohs, K.D. (2004), Handbook of self-regulation. Research, theory and applications. New York: Guilford Press.
- Brinol P., DeMarree (ed.) (2012), Social Metacognition. Psychology Press, Francis & Taylor Group: New York.
- Bilan Y. (2015), Is the consumer always right? International Journal of Management Cases. 17 I( 2), p 36-39.
- Brycz, H. (2004), Accuracy of Self versus Other perception. Cracow: Impuls.
- Brycz H. Karasiewicz K. (2011), Metacognition and self-regulation: the Metacognitive Self Scale. Acta Neuropsychologica, vol.9, nr. 3, pp. 263-498.
- Hanna Brycz, Maglaelena Wyszomiska - Góra, Yoram Bar - Tal, Piotr Wisniewski (2014), The effect of metacognitive self on confirmation bias revealed in relation to community and competence. Polish Psychological Bulletin, vol 45 (3), 306-311.
- Carver, C.S., Scheier, M.F. (1981), Attention and self-regulation: A control theory approach to human behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.
- Carver, C.S., Scheier, M.F. (1982), Control theory: A useful conceptual framework for personality-social, clinical, and health psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 1, 111-135.
- Carver, C.S., Scheier, M.F. (1998), Is Behavior Controlled or Does It Emerge? On the self regulation of behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 149-177.
- Cohen, D., Gunz, A. (2002), As seen by the other...:The self from the "outside in" and the "inside out" in the memories and emotional perceptions of Easterners and Westerners. Unpublished manuscript, University of Illinois.
- Epstein, S. (1980), Th e self-concept - A review and the proposal of an integrated theory of personality. [In:] E. Staub (ed.). Personality - Basic issues and current research. New York: Prentice Hall.
- Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R. (1997), The cultural construction of self-enhancement. An examination of group-serving biases. Journal ofpersonality and social psychology. 72, 1268-1283.
- Hull, J.G., Van Treuren, R.R., Ashford, S.J., Propsom, P., Andrus, B.W. (1988), Self--consciousness and the processing of self-relevant information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 3,452-465.
- Jones, E.E., Pittman, T.S. (1982), Toward a general theory of strategic self-presentation. [In:] J. Suls (ed.). Psychological perspectives on the self. New York: Hillsdale.
- Kahneman, D., Tverski A. (1973), On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80, 237-251.
- Karasiewicz, K. (2009), Metacognitive Self & the Directions of Self- control.(unpublished Ph.D dissertation, supervisor Hanna Brycz).
- Kitayama, S., Markus, H.R., Matsumoto, H, & Norasakkunit, V. (1997), Individual and collective processes in the construction of the self: Self enhancement in the United States and self-criticism in Japan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 72. 1245-67.
- Lee, F., Hallahan, M., Herzog, T. (1996), Explaining real life events: How culture and domain shape attributions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 732-741.
- Markus, H.R., Kitayama, S. (1991), Culture and the Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 2, 224-253.
- Moore, D.A., Small, D.A. (2007), Error and bias in comparative judgment: On being both better and worse than we think we are. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92,6, 972-989.
- Morris, M. W., Peng, K. (1994), Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 949-971.
- Metcalfe, J., Greene, M. (2007), Metacognition of Agency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 2, 184-199.
- Nisbett, R.E., Caputo, C., Legant, P., Maracek, J. (1973), Behavior as seen by the actor and as seen by the observer. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 154-164.
- Nisbett, R., Ross, L. (1980), Human inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. Prentice Hall, INC, Englewood Cliffs, N.Y. 07632.
- Norenzayan, A., Smith, E. E., Kim, B.J., Nisbett, R.E. (2002), Cultural preferences for formal versus intuitive reasoning. Cognitive Science, 26, 653-684.
- Norenzayan, A., Choi, I., Nisbett, R.E. (2002), Cultural similarities and differences in social inference: Evidence from behavioral predictions and lay theories of behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 109-120.
- Sedikides, C., Gragg, A.P. (2008), Self-enhancement: Food for thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 102-116.
- Suh, E., Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Triandis, H. (1998), The shifting basis of life satisfaction judgments across cultures: Emotions versus norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 2, 482-493.
- Ross, L. (1977), The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings. [In:] L. Berkovitz (eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 173-220. New York: Academic Press.
- Weiner, B. (2014), An anecdotical history of motivation. The Review of Psychology, 57, 311-335.
- Wojciszke B., Brycz H., Borkenau P. (1993), Effects of information content and evaluative extermity on positivity and negativity biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64,3, 327-335.