PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2015 | 6 | nr 2 | 32--39
Tytuł artykułu

A Simulation-Based Fuzzy Analytic Network Process Approach in Developing Sustainable Manufacturing Strategy

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
This paper adopts a probabilistic fuzzy analytic network process (PROFUZANP) approach in developing a sustainable manufacturing strategy. In this hybrid method, analytic network process handles the complexity of the problem structure under consideration, fuzzy set theory is used to describe vagueness in individual decision-making and probability theory is used to handle randomness in group decision-making. This holistic methodological approach addresses complexity and uncertainty both in individual and group decision-making which is useful in modeling group decisions such as developing a sustainable manufacturing strategy. In this work, an inclusive approach of integrating traditional manufacturing strategy concepts and sustainable manufacturing principles is proposed as a unifying decision model. The proposed decision structure adopts the hierarchical structure of manufacturing strategy and explores the presence of strategic responses and stakeholders' interests as significant components of sustainability. Using PROFUZANP, the decision model identifies the content policies of sustainable manufacturing strategy. This content strategy is expected to address both competitiveness and sustainability of manufacturing firms. Results are reported in this paper along with insights and future work. The contribution of this work is the integration of manufacturing strategy and sustainability into a coherent decision framework that requires the use of PROFUZANP in dealing with complex and uncertain group decision-making problem. (original abstract)
Rocznik
Tom
6
Numer
Strony
32--39
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • University of San Carlos, Philippines
autor
  • De La Salle University, Philippines
Bibliografia
  • [1] Skinner W., Manufacturing-missing link in corporate strategy, Harvard Business Review, 47,136-145, 1969.
  • [2] Wheelwright S.C., Reflecting corporate strategy in manufacturing decisions, Business Horizons, 21, 1, 57- 66, 1978.
  • [3] Wheelwright S.C., Manufacturing strategy: defining the missing link, Strategic Management Journal, 5, 1, 77-91, 1984.
  • [4] Fine C.H., Hax A.C., Manufacturing strategy: a methodology and an illustration, Interfaces, 15, 6, 28-46, 1985.
  • [5] Ward P.T., Bickford D.J., Leong G.K., Configurations of manufacturing strategy, business strategy, environment and structure, Journal of Management, 22, 4, 597-626, 1996.
  • [6] Hallgren M., Olhager J., Quantification in manufacturing strategy: a methodology and illustration, International Journal of Production Economics, 104, 1, 113-124, 2006.
  • [7] Hayes R.H., Pisano G.P., Beyond world-class: The new manufacturing strategy, Harvard Business Review, 72, 1, 77-86, 1994.
  • [8] Johansson G., Winroth M., Introducing environmental concern in manufacturing strategies: implications for the decision criteria, Management Research Review, 33, 9, 877-899, 2010.
  • [9] Joung C.B., Carrell J., Sarkar P., Feng S.C., Categorization of indicators for sustainable manufacturing, Ecological Indicators, 24, 148-157, 2013.
  • [10] Despeisse M., Mbaye F., Ball P.D., Levers A., The emergence of sustainable manufacturing practices, Production Planning and Control, 23, 5, 354-376, 2012.
  • [11] Smith L., Ball P., Steps towards sustainable manufacturing through modeling material, energy and waste flows, International Journal of Production Economics, 140, 1, 227-238, 2012.
  • [12] Pham D.T., Thomas A.J., Fit manufacturing: a framework for sustainability, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 23, 1, 103-123, 2012.
  • [13] Theyel G., Hofmann K., Stakeholder relations and sustainability practices of US small and medium-sized manufacturers, Management Research Review, 35, 12, 1110-1133, 2012.
  • [14] Wheelwright S.C., Strategy, management, and strategic planning approaches, Interfaces, 14, 1, 1933, 1984.
  • [15] Griffiths A., Petrick J.A., Corporate architectures for sustainability, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 21, 12, 15731585, 2001.
  • [16] Hallgren M., Olhager J., Quantification in manufacturing strategy: a methodology and illustration, International Journal of Production Economics, 104, 1, 113-124, 2006.
  • [17] Johansson G., Winroth M., Introducing environmental concern in manufacturing strategies: implications for the decision criteria, Management Research Review, 33, 9, 877-899, 2010.
  • [18] Barad M., Gien D., Linking improvement models to manufacturing strategies - a methodology for SMEs and other enterprises, International Journal of Production Research, 39, 12, 2675-2695, 2001.
  • [19] Tsai W.H., Chou W.C., Selecting management systems for sustainable development in SMEs: A novel hybrid model based on DEMATEL, ANP, and ZOGP, Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 2, 1444-1458, 2009.
  • [20] Vinodh S., Girubha R., PROMETHEE based sustainable concept selection, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 36, 11, 5301-5308, 2012.
  • [21] Ocampo L.A., Clark E.E., A sustainable manufacturing strategy decision framework in the context of multi-criteria decision-making, Jordan Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, in press.
  • [22] Saaty T.L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980.
  • [23] Saaty T.L., Decision making with dependence and feedback: The Analytic Network Process (2nd ed.) Pittsburg: RWS Publications, 2001.
  • [24] Saaty T.L., The analytic hierarchy and analytic network measurement processes: applications to decisions under risk, European Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 1, 1, 122-196, 2008.
  • [25] Saaty T.L., Relative measurement and its generalization in decision making: why pairwise comparisons are central in mathematics for the measurement of intangible factors, Journal Serie A Matematicas, 102, 2, 251-318, 2008.
  • [26] Buyukyazici M., Sucu M., The analytic hierarchy and analytic network processes, Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, 32, 65-73, 2003.
  • [27] Promentilla M.A.B., Furuichi T., Ishii K., Tanikawa N., Evaluation of remedial countermeasures using the analytic network process, Waste Management, 26, 12, 1410-1421, 2006.
  • [28] Hsu P.F., Kuo M.H., Applying the ANP model for selecting the optimal full-service advertising agency, International Journal of Operations Research, 8, 4, 48-58, 2011.
  • [29] Promentilla M.A.B., Furuichi T., Ishii K., Tanikawa N., A fuzzy analytic network process for multi-criteria evaluation of contaminated site remedial countermeasures, Journal of Environmental Management, 88, 3, 479-495, 2008.
  • [30] Zadeh L.A., Fuzzy set, Information and Control, 18, 3, 338-353, 1965.
  • [31] Tseng M.L., A causal and effect decision-making model of service quality expectation using grey-fuzzy DEMATEL approach, Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 4, 7738-7748, 2009.
  • [32] Kaufmann A., Gupta M.M., Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic: theory and applications, New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1985.
  • [33] Wang R.C., Chuu S.J., Group decision-making using a fuzzy linguistic approach for evaluating the flexibility in a manufacturing system, European Journal of Operational Research, 154, 3, 563-572, 2004.
  • [34] Von Altrock C., Practical fuzzy- logic design, The Computer Applications Journal, 75, 1-5, 1996.
  • [35] Tseng M.L., Modeling sustainable production indicators with linguistic preferences, Journal of Cleaner Production, 40, 46-56, 2013.
  • [36] Ocampo L.A., Clark E.E., A framework for capturing uncertainty of group decision-making in the context of the AHP/ANP, Advances in Industrial Engineering and Management, 3, 3, 7-16, 2014.
  • [37] Tseng M.L., Wang R., Chiu A.S.F., Geng Y., Lin Y.H., Improving performance of green innovation practices under uncertainty, Journal of Cleaner Production, 40, 71 -82, 2013.
  • [38] Opricovic S., Tzeng G.H., Defuzzification within a multi-criteria decision model, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 11, 5, 635-652, 2003.
  • [39] Tseng M.L., Lin Y.H., Chiu A.S.F., Liao J.C.H., Using FANP approach on selection of competitive priorities based on cleaner production implementation: a case study in PCB manufacturer, Taiwan, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 10, 1, 17-29, 2008.
  • [40] Paulson D., Zahir S., Consequences of uncertainty in the analytic hierarchy process: A simulation approach, European Journal of Operational Research, 87, 1, 45-56, 1995.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171398225

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.