Kontrowersje wokół relacji ryzyka strategicznego i wyników w zarządzaniu strategicznym

• Autorzy: Justyna Światowiec-Szczepańska

Warianty tytułu

The Controversy Around the Strategic Risk-performance Relationship in Strategic Management

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

W artykule wskazano główne problemy badawcze w zakresie naukowego ustalenia charakteru związku ryzyka strategicznego i wyników przedsiębiorstwa na podstawie analizy dotychczasowego dorobku teoretycznego i wybranych wyników badań empirycznych. W pierwszej części omówiono wyniki wybranych badań w omawianym obszarze oraz przedstawiono ich interpretację. W drugiej części przedstawiono podejścia do pomiaru ryzyka strategicznego i wyników w badaniach empirycznych opartych na różnym sposobie ujmowania lub definiowania ryzyka strategicznego. W podsumowaniu sformułowano kierunki przyszłych badań niezbędnych dla dalszej efektywnej eksploracji związku ryzyka strategicznego i wyników osiąganych przez przedsiębiorstwo. (abstrakt oryginalny)

EN

The article underlines the key issues in the field of scientific research aiming to determine the nature of the relationship of strategic risk and business performance based on the analysis of theoretical achievements to date and empirical results of selected studies. The first part discusses the results of selected research studies in this field and presents their interpretation. The second section presents the approaches to the measurement of strategic risk and performance in empirical studies based on the different ways of recognizing or defining strategic risk. In conclusion, directions for future research, necessary for further effective exploration of the strategic risk - performance relationship, were formulated. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Zarządzanie strategiczne; Ryzyko; Teoria perspektywy

EN

Strategic management; Risk; Prospect theory

• Czasopismo: Marketing i Rynek
• Rocznik: 2015
• Numer: nr 9 (CD)
• Strony: 662--671

Twórcy

autor

Justyna Światowiec-Szczepańska

• Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu

Bibliografia

• Andersen, T.J., Denrell, J. i Bettis, R.A. (2007). Strategic responsiveness and Bowman's risk-return paradox. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 28, 407-429.
• Baird, I.S. i Thomas, H. (1990). What is risk anyway?: Using and measuring risk in strategic management. W: Bettis, R.A. i Thomas, H. (red.), Risk, Strategy, and Management, Greenwich, Ct: JAI Press.
• Bartram, S.M. (2000). Corporate Risk Management as a Lever for Shareholder Value Creation, Financial Markets. Institutions and Instruments, Vol. 9, 279-324.
• Becerra, M. i Markarian, G. (2013). The Bowman Paradox and Industry Competition: Dynamics of the Risk-Performance Relationship, Paper submitted for presentation at XXXVIII Jornadas de Economia Industrial, https://editorialexpress.com/cgi-bin/conference/download.cgi?db_name=JEI2013&paper_id=41 (11.01.2015).
• Bettis, R.A. (1982). Risk considerations in modeling corporate strategy. W: K.H. Chung (red.) Academy of Management Proceedings'82, New York, 22-25.
• Bettis, R.A. i Mahajan, V. (1985). Risk/return performance of diversified firms. Management Science, Vol. 31, 785-799.
• Bowman, E. (1980). A risk/return paradox for strategic management. Sloan Management Journal, Vol. 21, 17-31.
• Bowman, E. (1982). Risk seeking by troubled firms. Sloan Management Review, Vol. 23, 33-42.
• Bowman, E. (1984). Content analysis of annual reports for corporate strategy and risk. Interfaces, Vol. 14, 61-71.
• Bromiley, Ph. (1991). Testing a Causal Model of Corporate Risk Taking and Performance. The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 34, 37-59.
• Bromiley, Ph., Miller, K.D. i Rau D. (2001). Risk in Strategic Management Research. W: Hitt, M.A., Freeman, R.E. i Harrison, J.S. (red.), The Blackwell Handbook of Strategic Management, Blackwell Business. Oxford, 259-288.
• Collins, J.M. i Ruefli, T.W. (1992). Strategic risk: An ordinal approach. Management Science, Vol. 38, 1707-1731.
• Cornell, B. i Shapiro, A.C. (1987). Corporate Stakeholders and Corporate Finance. Financial Management, Vol. 16, 5-14.
• Cyert, R.M. i March, J.G. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. NJ: Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
• Denrell, D.J. (2004). Risk taking and aspiration levels: two alternative null models. New Orleans, LA: Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings.
• Duncan, R.B. (1972). Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 17, 313-327.
• Fiegenbaum, A. i Thomas, H. (1988). Attitudes toward risk and the risk-return paradox: Prospect theory explanations. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 31, 85-106.
• Fiegenbaum, A. i Thomas, H. (2004). Strategic risk and competitive advantage: an integrative perspective. European Management Review, Vol. 1, 84-95.
• Gooding, R.Z., Goel, S. i Wiesman, R.M. (1996). Fixed versus variable reference points in the risk-return relationship. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 29, 331-350.
• Henkel, J. (2008). The Risk-Return Paradox for Strategic Management: Disentangling True and Spurious Effects. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1014325 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1014325 (11.01.2015).
• Jegers, M. (1991). Prospect theory and the risk-return relation: Some Belgian evidence. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 34, 215-225.
• Kahneman, D. i Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk. Econometrica, Vol. 47, 263-292.
• Mao, J. (1970). Survey of Capital Budgeting: Theory & Practice. The Journal of Finance, Vol. 25, 349-360.
• March, J. i Shapira, Z. (1987). Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Science, Vol. 33, 1404-1417.
• March, J. i Shapira, Z. (1992). Variable risk preferences and the focus of attention. Psychological Review, Vol. 99, 172-183.
• Marsh, T.A. i Swanson, D.S. (1984). Risk-return trade-offs for strategic management. Sloan Management Review, Vol. 25, 35-51.
• Maurer, F. (2008). Risk and return: new insights for theory, measurement and management. Journal of Applied Business Research, Vol. 24, 51-63.
• Miller, K.D. (1998). Economic exposure and integrated risk management. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 19, 497-514.
• Miller, K.D. i Bromiley, P. (1990). Strategic risk and corporate performance: an analysis of alternative risk measures. Academy for Management Journal, Vol. 33, 756-779.
• Miller, K.D. i Chen, W. (2003). Risk and Firms' Costs. Strategic Organization, Vol. 1, 355-382.
• Miller, K.D. i Chen, W. (2004). Variable Organizational Risk Preferences: Tests of the March-Shapira Model. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 47, 105-115.
• Miller, K.D. i Leiblein, M.J. (1996). Corporate risk-return relations: Returns variability versus downside risk. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39, 91-122.
• Nahotko, S. (2001). Ryzyko ekonomiczne w działalności gospodarczej. wyd. 2, Bydgoszcz: Biblioteka Menedżera i Służby Pracowniczej, Zeszyt 201.
• Oviatt, B.M. i Bauerschmidt, A.D. (1991). Business risk and return: A test of simultaneous relationships. Management Science, Vol. 37, 1405-1423.
• Ruefli, T.W. (1990). Mean-variance approaches to risk-return relationships in strategy: Paradox lost. Management Science, Vol. 36, 368-380.
• Ruefli, T.W. i Wiggins, R.R. (1994). When mean square error becomes variance: A comment on "Business risk and return: a test of simultaneous relationships". Management Science, Vol. 40, 750-759.
• Ruefli, T.W., Collins, J.M. i Lacugna, J.R. (1999). Risk measures in strategic management research: auld lang syne? Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 20, 167-194.
• Shapiro, A.C. i Titman, S. (1986). An integrated approach to corporate risk management. W: J.M. Stern i D.H. Chew Jr, (red.), The revolution in corporate finance. Oxford: Backwell.
• Sneier, R. i Miccolis, J. (1998). Enterprise risk management. Strategy and Leadership, Vol. 26, 11-16.
• Wang, H., Barney, J.B. i Reuer, J. (2003). Stimulating firm-specific investment through risk management. Long Range Planning, Vol. 36, 49-59.
• Whetten, D.A. (1987). Organizational effects of decline and turbulence. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 32, 222-240.