Management - Science in Statu Nascendi? Cognitive Challenges in Management and Marketing

• Autorzy: Łukasz Sułkowski
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This paper is the first publication from the series of four articles about cognitive challenges in management science. It is the result of the further discussions and reflections concerning the cognitive problems of management after publication of the books about epistemology of management. The question of identity of management perceived like a social science is important mainly to researchers, but also to reflective managers. The paper is a diagnosis of a current cognitive state with main thesis that management is still science in statu nascendi. Management belongs to the family of the social sciences and it is still in the primal stage of his evolution. First of all, there is a lack of agreement on the one paradigm or even one way of understanding and classifying the paradigms among scholars. Moreover, in consequence of multi-paradigmatic and multi-disciplinary approach, the polymethodological perspective must be applied to management sciences. That means, type of the methodological eclectism that is the third characteristic point of management epistemology. At the end of the chapter the case of the multiparadigmatic, poly-methodological and eclectic is shown in the marketing contemporary discourse.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Management; Organisation and management methodology; Management paradigms

PL

Zarządzanie; Metodologia organizacji i zarządzania; Paradygmaty zarządzania

• Czasopismo: Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie
• Rocznik: 2014
• Numer: t. 15, z. 4, cz.2 Współczesne wyzwania zarządzania marketingowego
• Strony: 9--19

Twórcy

autor

Łukasz Sułkowski

• Społeczna Akademia Nauk

Bibliografia

• Alvesson M., Willmott H.C. (2003), Studying Management Critically, Sage, London.
• Baudrillard J. (1994), Symulacra and Simulation, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
• Bolman L.G., Deal T.E. (2003), Reframing Organisations. Artistry, Choice and Leadrship, Jossey- Bass, San Francisco.
• Bourdieu P. (1987), Espace social et pouvoir symbolique, w: « Choses dites», Minuit, Paris.
• Burrell G., Morgan G. (1979), Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis, Heinemann, London.
• Dalton M., Chrobot-Mason D. (2007), A theoretical exploration of manager and employee social identity, cultural values and identity conflict management, "International Journal of Cross Cultural Management", 7.2, pp. 169-183.
• Denzin N. (1970), The Research Act: Theorethical Introduction to Sociological Methods, Aldine Publishing Co, Chicago.
• Denzin N. (2006), Sociological Methods: A Sourcebook, Aldine Transaction.
• Engholm P. (2001), The Controversy Between Modernist and Postmodernist Views of Management Science: Is a Synergy Possible?, Internet, Monash University.
• Feyerabend P. (1996), Przeciw metodzie, Siedmiorog, Wroclaw.
• Foucault M. (2000), Power Knowledge Selected Interviews & Other Writings, Random House, New York.
• Geertz C. (1973), The Interpretation of Cultures, Basic Books.
• Hatch M.J., Schultz M. (1996), Living with Multiple Paradigms. The Case of Paradigm Interplay in Organizational Culture Studies, "Academy of Management Review", Vol. 21, No 2.
• Howcroft D., Trauth E. (2005), Handbook of Critical Information Systems Research, Edward Elger, London.
• Johnson P., Duberley J. (2005), Understanding Management Research, Sage, London.
• Koontz H., O'Donnel C. (1972), Principles of management: an analysis of managerial functions, McGraw-Hill, pp. 25-26.
• Krzyzanowski L.J. (1999), O podstawach kierowania organizacjami inaczej: paradygmaty, metafory, modele, filozofia, metodologia, dylematy i trendy, PWN, Warsaw, p. 280.
• Parker M. (2002), Against Management, Cambridge.
• Peppers D., Rogers M. (1993), The One-To-One Future, Judy Piatkus Publishers.
• Remenyi D., Williams B., Money A., Swartz E. (2005), Doing Research in Business and Management. AnIntroduction to Process and Method, Sage, London.
• Sudoł S. (2014), Podstawowe problemy metodologiczne nauk o zarządzaniu, "Organizacja i kierowanie", nr 1.
• Sułkowski Ł. (2012), Epistemologia i metodologia zarządzania, PWE, Warszawa, pp. 106-112.
• Sułkowski Ł. (2004), Neopozytywistyczna mitologia w nauce o zarządzaniu, "Organizacja i kierowanie", nr 1 (115).
• Sułkowski Ł. (2006), Nurt krytyczny w naukach o zarządzaniu, "Współczesne zarządzanie", nr 1.
• Sułkowski Ł. (2009), Paradygmat neoewolucjonizmu w naukach o zarządzaniu, "Przegląd organizacji", nr 3.
• Sułkowski Ł. (2007), Problem demarkacji nauk o zarządzaniu, "Przegląd Organizacji", nr 1.
• Venkatesh A. (1999), Postmodernism Perspectives for Macromarketing: An Inquiry into the Global Information and Sign Economy, "Journal of Macromarketing", vol. 19, nr 12.