Reforming the International Financial Architecture : What Globalization Critics Demand and What Policymakers Have (Not) Achieved

• Autorzy: Peter Nunnenkamp
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In order to tame speculation and protect emerging markets from the vagaries of global financial markets, globalization critics demand radical changes in the international financial order. Policymakers, notably those in major industrial countries, are criticized for remaining committed to liberalized financial markets. However, a fundamental reconstruction of the financial architecture does not only lack political support. As argued below, some radical reform proposals are also flawed from an economic point of view. (fragment of text)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Finance; Globalization

PL

Finanse; Globalizacja

• Czasopismo: Prace Naukowe Akademii Ekonomicznej we Wrocławiu
• Rocznik: 2003
• Numer: nr 976, t. 2 Regionalizacja i globalizacja w gospodarce światowej
• Strony: 91--101

Twórcy

autor

Peter Nunnenkamp

Bibliografia

• Bundesministerium der Finanzen (2001). Stärkung der internationalen Finanzarchitektur: Überlegungen zur Reform des IWF und der Finanzmärkte. Berlin, mimeo.
• Deutsche Bundesbank (2000). The Role of the International Monetary Fund in a Changing Global Economic Environment. Monthly Report, September. Frankfurt.
• Eichengreen Barry J.: (1999). Toward a New International Financial Architecture: A Practical Post-Asia Agenda. Institute for International Economics, Washington, D.C.
• Fischer S.: (2000). Globalization: Valid Concerns? International Monetary Fund, Washington ton. D.C. http://www.imf.org/extemal/np/speeches/2000/082600.htm.
• Fischer S.: (2001). Exchange Rate Regimes: Is the Bipolar View Correct? Finance & Development 38 (2): 18-21.
• Flassbeck H.: (2000). Plädoyer für ein neues Weltwährungssystem. Internationale Politik 55 (6): 1-8.
• Griffith-Jones S.: (2000). Proposals for a Better International Financial System. World Economics 1 (2): 111-133.
• Krueger A.O.: (2001). International Financial Architecture for 2002: A New Approach to Sovereign Debt Restructuring. International Monetary Fund. Washington, D.C.
• Meltzer Report (2000). Report of the International Financial Institution Advisory Commission. Washington, D.C. http://phantom-x.gsia.cmu.edu/IFIAC/Report.html.
• Nunnenkamp P.: (1999). The Moral Hazard of IMF Lending: Making a Fuss about a Minor Problem? Institute for World Economics, Kiel Discussion Papers 332. Kiel.
• Nunnenkamp P.: (2001). Umbaupläne und Reparaturarbeiten an der internationalen Finanzarchitektur: Eine Zwischenbilanz aus deutscher Perspektive. Institute for World Economics, Kiel Working Papers 1078. Kiel.
• Nunnenkamp P.: (2002a). Internationales Insolvenzverfahren: Enttäuschte Hoffnung. Handelsblatt, August 8.
• Nunnenkamp P.: (2002b). IWF und Weltbank: Trotz aller Mangel weiterhin gebraucht? Institute for World Economics, Kiel Discussion Papers 388. Kiel.
• Raffer K.: (1998). The Tobin Tax: Reviving a Discussion. World Development 26 (3): 529-538.
• Reisen H.: (2001). Will Basel II Contribute to Convergence in International Capital Flows? Bankarchiv 49 (August).
• The Economist (2002). IMF/World Bank Meetings: Battling over the Bankrupt. October 5.
• Tobin J.: (1974). The New Economics One Decade Older. Princeton. N.J.: Princeton University Press.
• Williamson J.: (2000). The Role of the IMF: A Guide to the Reports. Institute for International Economics, International Economics Policy Briefs 00-5. Washington. D.C.
• Williamson J., Mahar M.: (1998). A Survey of Financial Liberalization. Princeton University, Essays in International Finance 211. Princeton.